This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
2016 ARB Baltimore WGM
Contents
Agenda Sunday Q4 Joint with SGB
- Call to order
- Roll Call
- Approval of Agenda
- Governance
- separation of concerns joint ARB/SGB
- Ref: August 22, 2016 TSC minutes
- Other business and planning
- Adjournment
Minutes Sunday Q4
While discussion was held the group did not have quorum until 4:55. It was agreed that ARB should go back to TSC to get clarification on the assignment.
Agenda Thursday Q3
- Call to order
- Roll Call
- Approval of Agenda and September 13, 2016 Minutes
- Methodology (60 minutes)
- Management
- Decision review
- Decision Making Procedures review
- Goals and Priorities
- wiki mission
- HL7 Page Mission and Charter review - depends on Goals and Priorities
- SWOT
- Wrap-up from WGM
- Governance
- Other business and planning
- Adjournment
Meeting Information Thursday Q3
HL7 ArB Work Group Meeting Minutes Location: Baltimore WGM |
Date: 20160922 Q3 - Time: 1:45pm U.S. Eastern | |||
Facilitator | Julian, Tony | Note taker(s) | Julian, Tony | |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | ||
R | Bond,Andy | NEHTA | ||
X | Constable, Lorraine | Constable Consulting Inc. | ||
. | Hyland, Mario | AEGIS | ||
X | Julian, Tony | Mayo Clinic | ||
X | Knapp, Paul | Pknapp Consulting | ||
X | Kubick, Wayne | HL7 CTO | ||
X | Loyd, Patrick | ICode Solutions | ||
R | Lynch, Cecil | Accenture | ||
R | Milosevic, Zoran | Deontik Pty Ltd | ||
X | Stechishin,Andy | CANA Software and Service Ltd. | ||
Guests | ||||
X | Mc Daniel, Mary Kay | Cognosante, LLC | ||
X | Luensman, Genny | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/CDC | ||
X | Reed-fourquet,Lori | e-HealthSign, LLC | ||
. | ||||
Legend | ||||
X | Present | |||
. | Absent | |||
R | Regrets | |||
Quorum Requirements (Co-chair + 3) Met: Yes |
Minutes Q3
- Management
- Motion to approve September 13, 2016 Minutes (Patrick/Lorraine)
- Vote (4-0-0)
- Methodology
- [ODH]
- Motion to approve Lorraine/Patrick
- Vote 4-0-0
- Second vote on DMP: Motion to approve (Patrick/Lorraine)
- Vote 4-0-0
- Motion to approve the following Mission:(Patrick/Lorraine)
- The HL7 ARB seeks to define a coherent architecture for HL7 work that defines the relationships among HL7 work products, other standards and components of local implementations.
- This architecture includes the Business Architecture by which these work products are produced and managed through their life cycle, the governance that will be enacted on these work products, and the scope of the standardization effort itself.
- The ARB also provides review and guidance on the use, implementation and conformance of work products.
- Motion to call the question.(Patrick/Lorraine)
- Vote on motion to call the question 4-0-1
- Vote on the mission statement 5-0-0
- Motion to send for next GOM change to para 09.03(Patrick/Lorraine)
- Vote 5-0-0
- Motion to approve Charter below(Patrick/Andy s)
- Charter
- Work Products and Contributions to HL7 Processes
- 1. The Architecture Board (ARB) defines and maintains the principles, language, and grammar of the Services Aware Interoperability Framework (SAIF) Canonical Definition (CD).
- 2. As an extension of the SAIF CD, the ARB also defines the mechanisms to ensure consistency of and traceability across and between HL7 standards artifacts from conceptual, logical, and implementable viewpoints.
- 3. The ARB provides guidance and support to working groups submitting artifacts or methodology using the SAIF IG to ensure they are compliant with the principles and language of the SAIF CD.
- 4. The ARB reviews, or evaluates other reviews of, work products using the SAIF CD review methodology. It provides a report that outlines any deviations from the SAIF CD methodology or measures of quality. Where such a work product is sent to full membership ballot, the ARB report shall be included in the ballot package.
- 5. The ARB may review the Mission and Charter and Project Scope statements of HL7 Working Groups prior to their consideration by the Technical Steering Committee(TSC). The ARB will consider whether projects undertaken are appropriately defined within HL7s mission.
- 6. The ARB will advise the TSC and HL7 Chief Technology Officer on matters relating to architectural aspects of standards artifacts as they are produced by HL7 Working Groups.
- 7. The ARB may review work products when requested to by HL7 Working Groups or the TSC.
- Formal Relationships With Other HL7 Groups
- TSC : The ARB reports to the TSC.
- Standards Governance Board(SGB): The ARB provides guidance and support to the SGB.
- Vote 4-0-0
- Motion to adjourn at 3:00pm Eastern
Report of Decisions made last cycle
- May 31, 2016
- CIMI Proof of concept
- Motion ARB be co-sponsor of the project, with periodic reports on progress what they are doing and where they are going.
- Zoran: On this PSS only? Need to clarify "• Demonstrate relationship between information models and logically computable expressions"
- Motion to table (Paul/Lorraine)
- Vote' 7-0-0
- CIMI Proof of concept
- June 7, 2016
- CIMI Proof of concept
- Motion ARB be co-sponsor of the project, with periodic reports on progress what they are doing and where they are going. To develop a better understanding how the CIMI artifacts integrate with the current products and families. (Lorraine/Paul)
- Andy B: Need to look at how we integrate new work groups - need to discuss with TSC, PLA, and PIC.
- Vote (4-0-0)
- CIMI Proof of concept
- June 14, 2016,June 21, 2016, June 28, 2016,July 5, 2016
- Discussed the ISM
- Prepared ISM PPT
- July 12, 2016
- Project Approval Request by the OO WG of the SSD-SD of Newborn Screening Lab Result Implementation Guide at Project Insight 1267 and TSC Tracker 10255
- Motion to approve(Lorraine/Wayne).
- Vote (4-0-0)
- ISM Review
- Developed ISM presentation.
- Project Approval Request by the OO WG of the SSD-SD of Newborn Screening Lab Result Implementation Guide at Project Insight 1267 and TSC Tracker 10255
- July 19,2016
- Refined ISM
- July 26, 2016
- EHR Immunization Functional Profile
- Motion To approve on behalf of the ARB (Lorraine/Patrick)
- Vote 6-0-0
- EHR Immunization Functional Profile
- August 2, 2016
- DAF Pss external content
- DAF should belong to another committee.
- Motion Arb agrees that the external content is appropriate. (Wayne/Paul)
- Vote 3-0-0
- DAF Pss external content
- August 16, 2016
- Discussed Guidance
- August 23, 2016
- Mission and Charter Review
- Review Technical Architecture
- August 30, 2016
- Mission and Charter Review (continued)
- Tabled due to exhaustion
- September 6, 2016
- Guidance Document Definition:
- A Guidance document is a type of informative document that describes principles, best practices, and general advice but is not sufficient to achieve the conformant implementation of one or more standards.
- Motion to accept the above(Andy S/Lorraine)
- Vote (5-0-0)
- A Guidance document is a type of informative document that describes principles, best practices, and general advice but is not sufficient to achieve the conformant implementation of one or more standards.
- September 13, 2016
- Immunization PSS referred by USRSC
- MotionARB has reviewed the external content and are happy with the processes in place.(Lorraine/Wayne)
- Vote (8-0-0)
- Immunization PSS referred by USRSC
Works in progress
- Mission and Charter
- Review after discussing goals
- Decision Making practices
- Second vote as required by the DMP for revisions
- Substantivity
- (Frieda)Follow up for this agenda item: "Substantivity PSS - update?" We didn't know if ARB had completed definition of Substantivity.
- This is URL to the ARB project, which is still open: http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/arb/projects.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=1259
- (Frieda)Follow up for this agenda item: "Substantivity PSS - update?" We didn't know if ARB had completed definition of Substantivity.
- BAM
- Where do we go from here?
- We started sunset, were going to review with PIC, but circumstances overcame