This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "20131022 FGB concall"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{subst::FGB Template}}")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
 
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"  
 
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"  
 
| width="0%" colspan="2" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''HL7 TSC FGB Meeting Minutes''' <br/>
 
| width="0%" colspan="2" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''HL7 TSC FGB Meeting Minutes''' <br/>
Line 31: Line 30:
 
*Roll call -  
 
*Roll call -  
 
*Agenda Review
 
*Agenda Review
*Approve minutes of [[2013MMDD FGB concall]]
+
*Approve minutes of [[20131015 FGB concall]], [[20130922 FGB WGM]], [[20130927_FMG_WGM_meeting]], notes of [[20131008 FGB concall]]
 
*Action Item review:  
 
*Action Item review:  
 +
**Grahame will address with Electronic Services on FHIR information on the HL7 website. e.g. banner scrolling at the top.
 +
**Ron to develop a narrative to set the explicit expectations for FHIR specifically based on the TSC's expectations for DSTU level of rigor
 +
**FMG & FGB to each discuss term staggering
 +
**Ron will schedule Woody, Grahame, Ron, and Austin/John to be on a call to evaluate policy assertions with conformity to ISO Datatypes
 +
**Ron develop precepts from the risks (conformity assessments, appeal processes, composition of FMG)
 
*FMG update -  
 
*FMG update -  
 +
**T3SD are asking FMG to consider an offer from publishing to assist in managing/publishing the FHIR standard for hl7, and how publishing might relieve FMG of some of this burden...What are FGB's and MnM's roles with respect to this effort as well?
 
*Methodology update-
 
*Methodology update-
<!--*Review precepts, associated governance points and risks
 
*HL7/IHE/DICOM coordination (John)
 
-->
 
 
*Next steps: Define and Resource other Governance processes.
 
*Next steps: Define and Resource other Governance processes.
<!--*#Education-->
+
**FGB composition to support DSTU adoption customer base
*#Conformity Assessment
+
**Extract policy assertions and decision criteria from management decisions related to connectathon registration
*#Appeal Process / Escalation
+
**criteria for seeking policy assertions,
*#*What is the appeal process for resources not chosen for inclusion in the ballot?
+
**escalation points on risk items triggering governance action
*#*What is the appeal / escalation process for Management decisions?
 
*#*What is the appeal / escalation process for Governance decisions? Responsibilities for resources (education, conformity process, appeal process)
 
 
 
  
 
==Minutes==
 
==Minutes==

Revision as of 18:20, 15 October 2013

HL7 TSC FGB Meeting Minutes

Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371#
GoToMeeting ID: 334-756-981

Date: 2013-mm-dd
Time: 8:00 AM U.S. Eastern
Facilitator: Ron Parker Note taker(s): Lynn Laakso
Quorum = Chair plus 2 yes/no
Chair/CTO Members Members
Ron Parker George (Woody) Beeler Ewout Kramer
John Quinn Grahame Grieve
observers/guests Austin Kreisler
Lynn Laakso, scribe

Agenda

  • Roll call -
  • Agenda Review
  • Approve minutes of 20131015 FGB concall, 20130922 FGB WGM, 20130927_FMG_WGM_meeting, notes of 20131008 FGB concall
  • Action Item review:
    • Grahame will address with Electronic Services on FHIR information on the HL7 website. e.g. banner scrolling at the top.
    • Ron to develop a narrative to set the explicit expectations for FHIR specifically based on the TSC's expectations for DSTU level of rigor
    • FMG & FGB to each discuss term staggering
    • Ron will schedule Woody, Grahame, Ron, and Austin/John to be on a call to evaluate policy assertions with conformity to ISO Datatypes
    • Ron develop precepts from the risks (conformity assessments, appeal processes, composition of FMG)
  • FMG update -
    • T3SD are asking FMG to consider an offer from publishing to assist in managing/publishing the FHIR standard for hl7, and how publishing might relieve FMG of some of this burden...What are FGB's and MnM's roles with respect to this effort as well?
  • Methodology update-
  • Next steps: Define and Resource other Governance processes.
    • FGB composition to support DSTU adoption customer base
    • Extract policy assertions and decision criteria from management decisions related to connectathon registration
    • criteria for seeking policy assertions,
    • escalation points on risk items triggering governance action

Minutes

Convened at

Next Steps

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items


Back to FHIR_Governance_Board

© 2013 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.