Difference between revisions of "INM Closed Action Items"
Smrobertson (talk | contribs) |
Smrobertson (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 253: | Line 253: | ||
*20060914: Still open with Guilt – need a single ITS development project (including XML structures) | *20060914: Still open with Guilt – need a single ITS development project (including XML structures) | ||
*20070108: WGM: close this, have the ITS SIG deal with this. | *20070108: WGM: close this, have the ITS SIG deal with this. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Item: 1091 == | ||
+ | '''reference to WS-Addressing in the profile needs to updated.''' | ||
+ | Opened 20060511 | ||
+ | Closed 20070726 | ||
+ | |||
+ | *20060511: San Antonio WGM: From joint InM/XML minutes Thursday Q1. | ||
+ | **WS-Addressing is not [sic] a W3C specification (done). The Web services profile can now point to a full specification not a draft. | ||
+ | **The reference to WS-Addressing in the profile needs to updated. (Roberto, and to review that we are conformant with the final version). | ||
+ | *20060911: Larson: This is not on the Wiki. Has this been done? Is it still active? | ||
+ | *20060913: Larson: Late entry to Wiki based on InM minutes from San Antonio WGM; Roberto R; W3C | ||
+ | *20060913: Charlie will speak to Roberto | ||
+ | *20070326: Charlie sent email to Roberto | ||
+ | *20070326: Charlie - moved to [[ITS SIG action items]] as ITS SIG responsible for specification | ||
+ | *20070726: Scott moved to InM close action items | ||
== Item: 1092 == | == Item: 1092 == |
Revision as of 02:00, 27 July 2007
This page contains action items closed between January and May 2007.
- Back to Infrastructure and Messaging TC
- Also see
Contents
- 1 ITEM: 33
- 2 ITEM: 71
- 3 ITEM: 958
- 4 ITEM: 967
- 5 ITEM: 978
- 6 ITEM: 1008
- 7 ITEM: 1009
- 8 ITEM: 1014
- 9 ITEM: 1018
- 10 ITEM: 1030
- 11 ITEM: 1064
- 12 ITEM: 1068
- 13 ITEM: 1069
- 14 ITEM: 1082
- 15 Item: 1090
- 16 Item: 1091
- 17 Item: 1092
- 18 Item: 1096
- 19 Item: 1101
- 20 Item: 1104
- 21 Item: 1105
- 22 Item: 1106
- 23 ITEM 1117
- 24 ITEM 1118
- 25 ITEM 1119
- 26 ITEM 1120
- 27 ITEM 1123
- 28 ITEM 1124
- 29 ITEM 1131
- 30 ITEM 1132
- 31 ITEM 1138
- 32 ITEM 1139
- 33 ITEM 1142
- 34 ITEM 1144
- 35 ITEM 1145
- 36 ITEM: 2010
- 37 ITEM: 2016
- 38 ITEM: 2017
- 39 ITEM: 2018
- 40 ITEM: 2034
ITEM: 33
The detectedIssue CMET should be moved to the CMET domain, and not be defined locally in MCAI
Opened: 28-Jan-05 Old Item: 221 Closed: 20070726 Assigned to: Scott
- 20050128, INM Chairs, Open
- INM WGM Orlando: Added. When creating the next version of MCAI, the detectedIssue CMET should be moved to the CMET domain, and not be defined locally in MCAI Pharmacy has a use-case for a message that shows all controlActs(+detectedIssue) related to a single order. This can be implemented today as a shared message. If implemented as a wrapper this would require that the tools support stubs with exit points.
- 20051105, INM Chairs, Open
- Rene: will remain open until such time where the controlAct domains will be up for a new release.
- 20051128, INM Chairs, Reviewed
- No Update
- 20060915 WGM: Michael vC: Also take relationship with ManagedIssue CMET and ReportedIssue CMET, Consent.
- 20070110: WGM: Michael: Pharmacy has created a new Pharmacy CMET topic. Issue is about harmonizing those in some fashion with the MCAI CMET. Michael to harmonize the various CMET, and bring forward a proposal on how it should be included in the wrappers.
- 20070502: WGM: Moving the CMET is part of Wrappers R2. Harmonization of the Pharmacy models with the existing one is still open. Michael vC: Approach will be to replace the current A_DetectedIssueEvent CMET class with a choice between domain specific deteceted issue CMETs and the current A_DetectedIssueEvent CMET. Pharmacy to send ID of CMET to INM for inclusion in the model.
- 20070726 Scott: Forwarded this item to ITS. Closed for InM.
ITEM: 71
Opened: 29-Sep-04 Old Item: 318 Draft procedure for agreeing to updates to 396. Will bring draft to CQ.
- 12-Jan-05 , Stan Huff , New , vocab
- Larson: The procedure should incorporate the decision made at the Atlanta WGM as follows: “All changes to sections for which Vocab is the steward, must be submitted to the v2 change proposal database.”
- 04-May-05 , Stan Huff , Open , vocab
- INM Noordwijkerhout: Stan will wridte procedure. It will include 1) submit to database ; 2) vocab reviews and makes decision taking in to account such things as redundancy, version and other policy requirements; 3) once approved is immediately valid; 4) notify INM editor Policy needs good definitions but also need to focus on operational factors.
- 01-Jun-05 , Stan Huff , Open , vocab
- Vocab Telcon: Discussion – Table 396 issue:-HL7 v2.x table 396 is the table of tables. One of the changes in 2.6 was to make content extensible without requiring a re-ballot. Need to document the process of how we put new entries, or update entries to table 396. Current process is to submit a V2.x proposal through the HL7 website.-Proposed solution is that every time a terminology is registered in the OID it would automatically go into Table 396 I V2.x. Vote taken and passed.-The content of tables is only available through the ballot, the document can be updated but there is no place online that you can look it up. Same problem of how to
- 15-Sep-05 , Tony Julian , Reviewed , vocab
- 20050914: Approved. Tony will check to see if in the substantivity guide.
- 28-Nov-05 , Tony Julian , Reviewed , vocab
- 20051128 Telcon - Open with Guilt!.
- 20060510 WGM: Substantivity guide has not been updated.
- 26-Jun-06 , Tony Julian , Reviewed , vocab
- 20060626 Telcon - Shift guilt to ARB - ask to approve with email ballot!.
- 20061120 Email sent to ARB, offering to update the substantivity guide to reflect above.
- 20070110 WGM: ARB in meeting is re-writing the substantivity guide. This suggestion will be taken into account. - Recommend closure: Tony
- 20070110 CLOSED
ITEM: 958
Opened: 26-Jul-05 Old Item: 0
MCCI - Check preface (MCCI)
- 26-Jul-05 , Tony Julian , New , MCCI
- 20050726: INM Telcon: Joann reported that HQ needs for us to include the previously balloted name in the preface. This document was originally balloted as a component of the Infrastructure Management document
- 13-Sep-05 , Tony Julian , Reviewed , MCCI
- 20050913: INM WGM San Diego: no update.
- 28-Nov-05 , Tony Julian , Reviewed , MCCI
- 20051128 INM Telcon: will be applied on next ballot.
- 20050110: WGM: item will remain open as a reminder to the editor of the next release of MCCI.
- 20060605: open until next release of MCCI
- 20070128, CLOSED, issue moved to MCCI R2 page.
ITEM: 967
Opened: 13-Sep-05 Old Item: 0 Security TC is requested to read WS security specification and provide guidance and suggestions related thereto.
- 13-Sep-05 , Glenn Marshall , New , Security
- 20050913 WGM: New
- 28-Nov-05 , Glenn Marshall , New , Security
- 20051128 INM Telcon: Doug e-mailed Glenn - We need the info Before phoenix
- 20060110, Glenn Marshall , open , Security
- 20060110 InM WGM Phoenix: Has been read, guidance has not yet been provided.
- 20060110, Glenn Marshall , open , Security
- 20060626 Telecon - Tony to send reminder.
- 20060912 WGM – John Moehrke not present, no information available. Glenn to touch base with John on status. Continue OPEN.
- 2007-05-01 InM WGM Köln – closed with exhaustion. No response from Security TC after multiple requests
ITEM: 978
Opened: 15-Sep-05 Old Item: 0
Work to add a new batch group class to the batch transmission wrapper. (MCCI)
- 15-Sep-05 , Penny Aitchson , Open , IM
- 2005-09-15 SAN WGM: New action item. The new class will contain attributes such as batch ID. A new sequence number needs to be added to the current batch class as well. New dynamic models, interactions, etc. need to be documented.
- 20060509, Penny Aitchson , Open , MCCI
- 20060507 INM out of cycle. Batch Transmission wrapper will be tranbsformed into a minimal transmission grouper. This action items should be discussed as part of the discussion of the NHS application syncing use-case of proposal 969.
- 20060509 INM WGM: Pending reasessment of underlying issues by NHS/BT.
- 20060605: still in progress and being worked on
- 20070109: close, rendered a non-issue because of decisions on the nature of the MCCI batch wrapper during the ooc meeting May 2006.
ITEM: 1008
Opened: 03-Oct-05 Old Item: 0 20051003: Post UML reconciliation package for May 2005 ballot.
- 03-Oct-05 , Grahame Grieve , New , UML
- Post UML reconcillation Package for May 2005 ballot
- 20060112 PHX WGM: No change
- 20060511 WGM: Open with extreme guilt.
- 20060913 WGM: continued (no discussion)
- 20070108: WGM: overwhelming guilt.
- 2007-05-01 InM WGM Köln – continued. Make sure all of the I’s are dotted and t’s are crossed so this can be closed
- 20070504: WGM: DONE! and closed
ITEM: 1009
Opened: 03-Oct-05 Old Item: 0 20051003: Request withdrawal of negative votes against UML May 2005 ballot.
- 03-Oct-05 , Grahame Grieve , New , UML
- 20051003: INM Telcon: After Reconciliation Package is posted, need to officially request voters to withdraw negative votes by November 14.
- 20060112 PHX WGM: No change
- 20060511 WGM: Open with extreme guilt.
- 20060913 WGM: continued (no discussion)
- 20070108: WGM: overwhelming guilt.
- 2007-05-01 InM WGM Köln – continued. Make sure all of the I’s are dotted and t’s are crossed so this can be closed
- 20070504: WGM: Now need to send out a note explaining what happened with the ballot and talk to Karen Van Henteryck about it.
- 20070511: Sent the email. This item is now closed
ITEM: 1014
Opened: 03-Oct-05 Old Item: 0
Get MLLP negatives withdrawn (May2005 cycle) (MLLP)
- 03-Oct-05 , Tony Julian , New , MLLP
- Post Reconcillation Package
- 20051114: still open
- 20060501: Changed from "Post reconciliation package" to "get negatives withdrawn". There are 5 open negative votes.
- 20060605: Open with guilt
- 20060915: Tony to check the ballot website and get votes withdrawn
- 20070108: WGM: Tony did this - but will check on open nagetives.
- 20070109: WGM: All negatives have been withdrawn - Recommend closure (Tony)
- 20070109: WGM: Closed
ITEM: 1018
Seek harmonization of definitions in glossary for Sender and Receiver. [Webservices]
Opened: 10-Oct-05 Closed: 20070726 Assigned to: Miroslav
- 20051010: INM Telcon: Seek harmonization of definitions in glossary for Sender and Receiver. Specifically need to follow-up with Pubs. Roberto will send info to Joann.
- 20060110: Phoenix WGM: Still open as above. Roberto will harmonize the definition within Transports. Joann will submit to HQ glossary keeper.
- 20060605: Still open
- 20060913 WGM: Miroslav to talk with Roberto, make sure the usage of these terms is harmonized
- 20070501 WGM: Definitions have been on the Wiki for a while now, Roberto has been unable to review up to now. Remains open as a reminder to add it to the Wrappers R2 glossary.
- 20060702 Telcon: Scott will e-mail Miroslav
- 20070726 Scott understood this was to go to ITS. sent to ITS and closed
ITEM: 1030
Change cardinality of MSG Data Type in v2.XML specification, discovered item, from e-mail from Alberto Sáez Torres
Opened: 20051129 Closed: 20070726 Assigned: Scott Robertson
- 20051129, Tony Julian, New
- In the MSG data type description (message type, used in MSH-9) it is said that all the components (message code, message trigger, message sctructure) are required, but the schema marks all of them as optional.
So, the schema should be change from:
<xsd:complexType name="MSG"> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element ref="MSG.1" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/> <xsd:element ref="MSG.2" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/> <xsd:element ref="MSG.3" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/> </xsd:sequence> </xsd:complexType>
To :
<xsd:complexType name="MSG"> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element ref="MSG.1" /> <xsd:element ref="MSG.2" /> <xsd:element ref="MSG.3" /> </xsd:sequence> </xsd:complexType>
- 20051129, Tony Julian, V2
- pending further information
- 20051129, Alberto Sáez Torres
- Actually, the MSG-data type is described in section 2.A.44 of Chapter 2A, Page 2-175, but the error is located in the XSD and DTD files for Version 2.5. The XSD affected file is “datatypes.xsd” and the DTD file is “datatypes.dtd”. This is the reason why I’ve CC-ed this message to the XML list.
- (According to the MSG data type, the line from datatype.dtd): <!ENTITY % MSG "(MSG.1?,MSG.2?,MSG.3?)"> Should be changed (in my opinion) to <!ENTITY % MSG "(MSG.1,MSG.2,MSG.3)">
- 20060508 InM WGM San Antonio: Frank Oemig, open
- 20060508 InM San Antonio: Remains open
- 2006-09-12 No update – Frank not present.
- 2007-01-08 InM WGM San Diego, Mon Q4
- discussed and agreed to the changes to both the schema and dtd.
- question: who is the 'editor' of the schema? an XML SIG perl script against an extract of Frank's database. Frank will investigate where the correction needs to be made.
- We need an errata for v2.5 xml and verify the correction is in place in the v2.6 xml.
- 2007-05-01 InM WGM Köln – Scott to make sure is moved to ITS SIG
- 20070702: Telcon : Scott has been reminded.
- 2007-07-26: Scott (finally) sent this item to ITS for follow-up. Moved to Close Action Item list.
ITEM: 1064
Opened: 20060508 Closed: 20070110
formally document updatemode/auditing methodology in the abstract DT spec.
- 20060508, new, XML SIG, Abstract data types
- 20060914 Part of Datatypes R2. Grahame to create wiki entry
- 20070110 Now part of R2.
ITEM: 1068
Opened: 20060508
Document and specify values for the QueryRequestLimit vocabulary, QUQI
- 20060509, QUQI editor, new, QUQI
- QUQI_RM020000UV01, QueryRequestLimit: No vocab values are defined forn this unit of quantity -recommend this is reviewed. Evaluate use-case and code-set values.
- 20060822: added to THU Q2 agenda of the Sep2006 WGM
- 20060915: WGM discussion.
- Add: Record (=item of interest, mostly focal act).
- Bytes is tricky, because of ITS dependent sizes. Is this a contract issue, or a run time issue? Courtesy request? Strawvote: 1-15-3
- Add: Record (=item of interest, mostly focal act).
- Rephrase action: create harmonization proposal to add Records to the QueryRequestLimit vocabulary.
- 20061222, Rene, created wiki page.
- 20070110 WGM Closed, see proposal.
ITEM: 1069
Opened: 20060508
HL7StandardVersion and humanlanguage to be discussed with Pubs, Pubs
- 20060509, Joann, new, Pubs
- HL7StandardVersion: no V3 codes in Vocab-applies
- humanlanguage: no HL7 vocab or ISO recommendation – take up with Vocab. IETF x66 according to Rosetree, not a vocab issue, pubs issue.
- 20060915: No information about progress
- 20070108: Is on the agenda WED Q4, our joint with vocab.
- 20070110: humanlanguage - WGM Take up with PUBS to see if this is a tooling issue.
- 20070110: HL7StandardVersion - This has been fixed.
ITEM: 1082
Opened 20060619 Telcon
Is use of ID/IDRef model derived?
- 20060619, Joseph Waller, new, XML ITS?
- ask Lloyd to elaborate on how using ID/IDRef – model derived or not? and if so (or not) how does this end up in schema?.
- 20060828, Rene: open. XML SIG has studied the use of XML ID/IDREF for use by the ITS to minimize the size of messages on the wire. Based on the outcome of that they will move the motion during teh upcoming WGM that ID/IDREF can't bse used within the ITS (because of technical implementation reasons as will be stated in the motion). Joseph's question appears to be wider in scope however, he wants to know if the samentic concept of ID/IDREF exists within the RIM, much as the concept of a mixed content datatype also exists within the abstract datatype specification.
- See Use of ID/IDREF for details.
- 20070110, Make it a MnM Hot Topic then close this item.
- 20070112, Created Hot Topic.
Item: 1090
Opened 20060112
See if project scope document can be changed.
- 20060112 Phoenix WGM; item opened as follows: Did project scope document include all 4: Abstract data types, XML structures, UML data types and XML data types?
- 20060512 No. only includes Abstract data types, UML data types, XML data types. Grahame to see whether project proposal can be changed
- 20060911: Larson: This is not on the Wiki. Has this been done? Is it still active?
- 20060913: Larson: Late entry to Wiki based on InM minutes from Phoenix and San Antonio WGM.Description updated to reflect 5/12 note "See if project scope document can be changed".
- 20060914: Still open with Guilt – need a single ITS development project (including XML structures)
- 20070108: WGM: close this, have the ITS SIG deal with this.
Item: 1091
reference to WS-Addressing in the profile needs to updated.
Opened 20060511 Closed 20070726
- 20060511: San Antonio WGM: From joint InM/XML minutes Thursday Q1.
- WS-Addressing is not [sic] a W3C specification (done). The Web services profile can now point to a full specification not a draft.
- The reference to WS-Addressing in the profile needs to updated. (Roberto, and to review that we are conformant with the final version).
- 20060911: Larson: This is not on the Wiki. Has this been done? Is it still active?
- 20060913: Larson: Late entry to Wiki based on InM minutes from San Antonio WGM; Roberto R; W3C
- 20060913: Charlie will speak to Roberto
- 20070326: Charlie sent email to Roberto
- 20070326: Charlie - moved to ITS SIG action items as ITS SIG responsible for specification
- 20070726: Scott moved to InM close action items
Item: 1092
Opened 20060511
Need representative to the W3C WS Policy charter group
- 20060511: San Antonio WGM: From joint InM/XML minutes Thursday Q1.
- Paul has posted the W3C draft charter for WS-Policy. Paul thinks that HL7 should support the charter for this. HL7 should put a representative on this committee. A co-chair of the working group is Chris Ferris. Chris has some knowledge of what we are doing, but represents IBM, as chair. He thinks that HL7 should send additional people as HL7 and IBM’s needs are different. Paul talked to Chris and Kevin about finding someone.
- 20060911: Larson: This is not on the Wiki. Has this been done? Is it still active?
- 20060913: Larson: Late entry to Wiki based on InM minutes from San Antonio WGM; W3C
- 20060913: Grahame to talk to Kevin Kelly about this
- 20061002: Telcon - Tony e-mailed Grahame concerning this.
- 20070108: WGM: Question comes up why we would need a representative. Our work is downstream from them. Close with exhaustion and reconsideration.
Item: 1096
Opened 20060511, Grahame, XML
Update the project scope to include XML Structures R2 and submit to HQ.
- 20060511: San Antonio WGM: Added.
- Grahame to update the project scope to include XML Structures R2 and submit to HQ. (Galen Mulrooney) to help
- 20060912: Larson: This item is not on the Wiki. Is it still relevant?
- 20060913: Larson: Late entry to Wiki based on InM minutes from San Antonio WGM.
- See also item 1090. These should be merged.
- 20061002: Telcon still open
- 20070108: closed, ITS will deal with this.
Item: 1101
Opened 20060914, Doug Pratt, Version 2
Develop policy and procedure for reserving trigger event codes.
- 14-Sep-06 Opened. Consider such things as where to store pending numbers, how long to hold a reservation, etc.
- 20061002: Telcon still open
- 20061004: Draft posted to wiki, see V2.x InM Identifier Reservations
- 20070108: close this (with pride), done
Item: 1104
How to appoint additiona co-chairs in the new ITS SIG, procedural
- Charlie McCay to find out how to get new co-chairs for the ITS sig.
- 20060914: Opened
- 20061002: Telcon still open
- 2006-11-13 Open
- 20070108: closed, new co-chair postition ahs been created
Item: 1105
Document that UML ITS R2 fulfills ITS acceptance citeria, UML ITS
- Grahame Grieve & Charlie McCay to fill out a proposal with acceptance criteria and brought to a INM telecon for the new ITS work..
- 20060914: Opened
- 20061002: Telcon still open
- 2006-11-13 Open
- 20070110: Closed: This is now an action item on the ITS Sig agenda.
Item: 1106
Add project acceptance criteria to INM DMP, procedural
- Tony Julian to document the existence of ITS acceptance criteria in the INM DMP and relate this to a more general project acceptance process (and pass to HQ for completion?)
- 20060914: Opened
- Rene: suggest that this be done in a generic fashion from the start (a project acceptance process), and not be project specific.
- 20061002: Telcon still open
- 2006-11-13 Open
- 20070108: WGM: close, given that organziation as a whole is working on process & procedures in this area
ITEM 1117
Prioritize the action items, Administrative
- 2006-11-13 - New. Scott Robertson assigned.
- 20070108: closed, due to low priority of the action item
ITEM 1118
Document gap between XML Schema and ITS Capabilities, XML
- 2006-11-13 - New. Grahame to detail those requirements of the XML and UML ITS' that cannot be represented by XML Schemas. Related to Normative XML ITS Schema INM Workitem.
- 20070110 - still undergoing further development. To be transferred to ITS Sig
- 20070326 - Charlie: added item to ITS SIG list -- suggest closed here
- 20070618 Closed Telcon 20070618
ITEM 1119
Propose an official status for XML schemas
- 2006-11-13 - New. Grahame to contact HQ and see if there is an ANSI-defined status that conveys a level of correctness and support to implementers, but that stops short of "normative" and all of the burden that comes with it. If none exist, will propose a new status (e.g., "HL7 Sanctioned"). Related to Normative XML ITS Schema INM Workitem.
- 20070110 - Still waiting for response - To chase up and transfer this item to ITS Sig
- 20070326 - Charlie: action added to ITS SIG list - suggest closed here
- 20070618 Closed Telcon 20070618
ITEM 1120
Draft Charter for ITS SIG
- 2006-12-04 - New. Paul will work with Charlie to draft charter for ITS SIG to include XML and UML (and little, if any, emphasis on Transports). To be considered at 11 Dec 2006 InM Telcon.
- 20070108: WGM: closed, done
ITEM 1123
Post ITS SIG Mission Statement ,,, Organizational
- 2007-01-08 - Charlie McCay Charlie to post ITS SIG mission statement to WIKI, and direclty e-mail the content to Doug Pratt
- 2007-03-26 Charlie: done -- the HL7.org website has also been updated
- 20070618 Closed telcon 20070618
ITEM 1124
Harmonize the use of Transport in documents moved to INM Transmission and Transport Action Items Item 2028
ITEM 1131
Add documentation to the shared messages ballot that CACT is only used as a reference.
- Rene, new, 2007-01-11
- Related to line item 7 of the Jan2007 SharedMessages ballot.
- This interaction isn't that much about nullifying the controlAct, it's actually about nullfying any associated actions the receiver may have taken - related to that CACT. The CACT is used as a "reference" in this use case, its status doesn't change
- 20070502: Done, closed.
ITEM 1132
Bring existing CA material in the area of “consent in the controlActWrapper” forward to INM
- Michael vC/Kathleen, new, 20070111
- See Consent in Queries.
- 20070502: WGM: Subsumed by other activities/action item around consent in CACT wrapper. Closed.
ITEM 1138
find out in what datatype the "IIRef" functionality is covered'
- 20070402 INM Telcon: Doug, new
- Need word from Charlie McCay or Grahame to find out in what datatype “IIRef” is covered, i.e. the data type that holds the “URI/URL string”.
- Paul: We have previously spoken about an IIRef data type to be used to refer from one object to another object. This was done May 2006. The we had discussion in Jan about creation of additional references. Unknown if this is contained in ISO Datatypes DSTU ballot. Need to have a solution or we won’t be able to reference (in the Wrappers R2 project) the attachment class from the payload in a Transmission.
- 20080618 Closed see R2 proposal 94.
ITEM 1139
Orchestration of error responses in batch messages
opened: 2007-05-01 assigned: Rene closed: 2007-05-01
- 20070501 InM WGM Köln: Rene will be writing up this topic in the Dutch Implementation Guide. Will bring back to InM with a proposal as appropriate. Opened and Closed today, primarily to track the concept being considered.
- 20070604: CLOSED
ITEM 1142
create HQ paperwork for Shared Message ballot for September 2007 ballot cycle
opened: 2007-05-02 assigned: Rene
- 20070502 InM WGM Köln: Rene to create HQ paperwork for Shared Message ballot for September 2007 ballot cycle.
- 20070604: still need balot announcement form
- 20070618: Telcon closed
ITEM 1144
Remind JavaSIG to formally agree to the their new owner
Opened 2007-05-04 assigned: Grahame
- 20070511: Sent email to the JavaSIG
- 20070604: closed.
ITEM 1145
Complete paperwork for Datatypes abstract Draft For Comment
Opened 2007-05-04 assigned: Grahame
- 20070604: still need ballot announcement form
- 20070618: Closed see Minutes 20070618 Telcon
ITEM: 2010
Reconcile discrepancy between ATS and WSP regarding Reliable Messaging [ATS/Webservices]
Opened: 20060110 Assigned to: Roberto
- 20060110, Roberto Ruggeri, New, Webservices/ATS, Phoenix WGM: Item added to reconcile decision to make Reliable Messaging non-mandatory with the Abstract Transport Spec which requires “all” transports to be reliable.
- 20060605: Still open
- 20060510: SAT WGM: Lengthy discussion, outcome: In the overall HL7 implementation, there needs to be reliability at all levels, up to and including the application level. Transport can handle reliability only up to the point of delivery (DESTINATION). Motion approved to craft language for the ATS to address this item.
- 20070502: Closed
ITEM: 2016
Opened: 20060501
Fix grammar issue in MCCI R2 Preface of next ballot, related to MCCI R2 line-item 138
- 20060501, co-chairs, new, MMCI
- For the MCCI preface related to batches: to replace “HL7 Query” with “'HL7 queries' in general” at the earliest convenient time, if the existing wording is used in the preface of the next ballot.
- 20060821, will remain open, without updates, until such time MCCI is published again
- 20070128 CLOSED, moved to MCCI R2 issue list
ITEM: 2017
Opened: 20060508
Get hold of CCOW abstract specification related to HL7 Messaging Architecture [MCCI]
Assigned to: Doug, Miroslav
- 20060508, co-chairs, new, MCCI
- 20070109, Miroslav, has sent e-mail to CCOW co-chairs, no reply. Doug will put Miroslav in contact with Barry Royer.
- 20070502, Closed.
ITEM: 2018
Opened: 20060509
to add wording to MCCI Preface to explain rationale for fixing acceptAckCode to ER.
- 20060509, Rene, new, MCCI
- 20060509: INM WGM: added after discussing this requirement (again). Documentation should be clarified to ensure that future readers will not have the same questions.
- 20060821: will remain open, without updates, until such time as MCCI is published again.
- 20060912: WGM INM: assign to Miroslav, incoorporate in ATS if necessary.
- 20060912, Miroslav, open, ATS
- 20070128, CLOSED, added as an action item on the MCCI R2 page.
ITEM: 2034
Create/update Wrapper Issues document [MCCI]
Opened: 20070110 Assigned to: Rene