20130807 BAM Modeling

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

TSC representatives and ArB to jointly develop content for the BAM for the Product Line Architecture Program

HL7 BAM Modeling Call Minutes

Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371#
GTM 111-567-781

Date: 2013-08-07
Time: 2 pm Eastern Time
Facilitator Austin Kreisler Note taker(s) Lynn
Attendee Name


x Calvin Beebe
Woody Beeler
Jane Curry
Bo Dagnall
regrets Jean Duteau,
Tony Julian
x Austin Kreisler,
x Lynn Laakso
Cecil Lynch
regrets Ron Parker
x Brian Pech
regrets Melva Peters
no quorum definition

Agenda

Agenda

Minutes

  • Review minutes of 20130731_BAM Modeling, notes of 20130612 BAM Modeling (no call 6/19), and 20130626 BAM Modeling
  • Review notes of 20130710 BAM Modeling
  • Review minutes of 20130717_BAM Modeling (20130731 cancelled)
  • Continued discussion on the model diagram
    • Last discussion was Calvin and Cecil suggestion for one governance group instead of one over each product. The narrowest division would be by things that create ITSs for granularity of a product family - sharing common production methodology, development methodology, etc. at the producer's perspective.
    • New Tutorial creation? If Education is its own product family then yes it falls under the Governance Board. Looking at the activities of governance they don't go through the ballot process, it doesn't share a modeling topic. If this is also constrained to products that are standards then Education is excluded.
    • Domain models? Are they upstream of standards? Need to be built such that they are consistent across implementations.
    • Product director would likely be staff, reporting through CTO, associated with a single Standards Governance Board
    • further revisions discussed.
    • Decision to set up a product family is to set up a product management groups for that family. SDWG operates as such for a large set of IGs, Arden Syntax is their own. What does it mean to have a management group for a multi-product family? V2 (V2.x editors group) and FHIR (FMG) are approached as a single product. Other single-product areas may not have a whole management group set up e.g. CCOW or Arden. Litmus test of need for management group is the cross-WG development on a product family. Also, how many products should a management group be charged to manage… Consolidated CDA have its own group, and then what about the rest? US Realm CCDA product line, part of US Realm Product line for all US Realm products including CDS etc. EHR-S FM and FP is a product family, HSSP work with SOA are product family, etc. Need to recognize the methodology used by each of these areas. Perspectives should also be aggregated by a methodology function. However, management and methodology groups should not be the same. Perhaps the methodology SD should be represented by methodology WGs where SDWG would separate out different methodology and content development WGs
  • PSS development for CDA R2 IG Product Family next week.

Adjourned at 3:08


Meeting Outcomes

Actions
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items

© 2013 Health Level Seven® International. All rights