20130612 BAM Modeling

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

TSC representatives and ArB to jointly develop content for the BAM for the Product Line Architecture Program

HL7 BAM Modeling Call Minutes

Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371#
GTM 111-567-781

Date: 2013-06-12
Time: 2 pm Eastern Time
Facilitator Ron Parker Note taker(s) Lynn
Attendee Name


Calvin Beebe
Woody Beeler
Jane Curry
Bo Dagnall
Jean Duteau,
Tony Julian
regrets Austin Kreisler,
x Lynn Laakso
Cecil Lynch
Ravi Natarajan
x Ron Parker
x Brian Pech
Melva Peters
Quorum Requirements Met: (yes/No)
quorum definition?

Agenda

Agenda

  • Review minutes of 20130529_BAM Modeling
  • update of ArB a-ha moment on three axes of product platform as a paradigm (technology binding/context); product line as a business domain (Function), and product family as a methodology (Form)
  • discuss what SDWG need to do to develop a PSS.

Need to identify deliverables on

  • notional definition of what that product family/line would be
  • How you will stand up Governance, how you will stand up Management, how to stand up methodology. Agenda division, or governance one meeting/month, etc?
  • high-level market segmentation and statement of what they value, what constitutes success
  • PSS they would declare the interested parties, who are the customers, etc
  • Risks of doing or not doing the effort
    • update on presentation at SDWG cochairs call on setting up PSS for the CDA R2 IG product family.
    • Present a chopped down version of Governance 101 along with concrete suggestions on what to do with their agenda especially separating out governance and management and teasing out methodology as well.
    • Need BAM checklist for initiation of PSS for CDA IG Product Family and identify deliverables of the project WRT goals/objectives/risks, RACI chart. List of things you need to establish as part of the project.
  • Discuss Security Risk Assessment Cookbook process


Minutes

Lynn asks about a template or form for developing a governance precept that Austin asserted that Ron would have, to use in the TSC Risk Assessment effort. Ron will try to develop such a form but he differs in his view of precepts than Erl's definition and believes that HL7 needs a more concrete and finite description to be usable.

Brian asks if FGB will likely meet.

Adjourned 2:11 PM

Meeting Outcomes

Actions
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items

© 2013 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.