2012-02-09 Tooling Call
Contents
Tooling Meeting Template
Meeting Information
| HL7 Tooling Meeting Agenda/Minutes Location: Phone: +1 770-657-9270; |
Date: 2012-02-09 Time: 10:00 am EST |
| Facilitator: Jane Curry | Note taker(s): Lynn Laakso |
| Attendee | Name, Affiliation |
| . | . |
| regrets | Woody Beeler, Beeler Consulting |
| x | Wilfred Bonney, HL7 HQ |
| x | Jane Curry, Co-Chair |
| Tim Ireland, Co-chair | |
| x | Lynn Laakso, HL7 HQ Tooling Support |
| x | Andy Stechishin, Co-chair |
| Quorum Requirements Met (co-chair plus 3 counting staff): yes | |
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- Roll Call & Agenda Review;
- Approval of previous minutes from 2012-01-12 Tooling Call, Tooling_WGM_2012Jan16, Tooling_WGM_2012Jan17, Tooling_WGM_2012Jan19
- no approval of minutes from 2012-02-02 Tooling Call last week - no quorum
- SWOT analysis
- all WG SWOTs examples
- Tooling SWOT
- Review action items -
- Update on HL7 Tooling Challenge and measurements of participation
- Update on V3 Generator Tool [Lloyd]
- Review projects- assign new due dates:
- MIF - next Milestone date 2012Sept, at PI# 578
- MIF Phase II - next Milestone date 2011Jan, at PI# 665
- SMD Enhancement - next Milestone date 2010Sept, at PI# 690
- MAX - next Milestone date 2012Jan, at PI# 742
- Tooling Strategy and Process Revision - next Milestone date 2012Jan, at PI# 801
- Tooling Comm Plan/Execution - next Milestone date 2012Jan, at PI# 802
- Tooling Dashboard - next Milestone date 2012Jan, at PI# 803
- GForge Alternative Assessment - next Milestone date 2012Jan, at PI# 804
- EHR-S FM Profiling tool - next Milestone date 2012Jan, at PI# 831
- Other/New Business
Supporting Documents
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Discussion on Tooling Challenge and email thread from cochairs on Tooling Challenge process; describe what we think the process is for evaluating. Need budgeting discussion first week of march, and StrucDocs and Vocab requirements discussions later in the cycle. UML profile with MIF static model binding for the stuff that's not there using the profile extension language. Means we have to pull in static model, vocabulary and datatypes model - at concept domain or implementable level in UML but $4k may not be enough. Might be enough to start, though. Where do you draw the line? One must have Model structure, vocab binding structure and datatype binding structure, referencing other MIF files to be successful. Need to describe the problem and offer award for defining UML profile for what can be defined and identifying extensions in UML needed to complete the task. For the HL7 stereotyping UML artifacts in Enterprise Architect suggestion, as proof of concept of the UML profile. How would we describe what makes a solution successful? EA can accept UML profiles (theoretically) so one must describe a UML profile to the extent possible (rather than expect a complete representation of a MIF static model) and demonstrate using EA to apply the resulting UML profile. How far can we push this tool to complete the MIF models and related models that this product can accept? Producing an XMI transform once you have the UML profile is not so difficult.
- Andy arrives 10:17 AM and quorum is achieved.
- Jane reviews proposed changes to the HL7 Tooling Challenge wiki page.
- Andy moves approval of the proposed Tooling Challenge. Lynn seconds. Motion passes.
Adjourned 11:10AM EST
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.
