This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

2012-02-09 Tooling Call

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tooling Meeting Template

Meeting Information

HL7 Tooling Meeting Agenda/Minutes

Location: Phone: +1 770-657-9270;
Participant PassCode:586935#
GoToMeeting URL:
https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/699884034

Date: 2012-02-09
Time: 10:00 am EST
Facilitator: Jane Curry Note taker(s): Lynn Laakso
Attendee Name, Affiliation
. .
regrets Woody Beeler, Beeler Consulting
x Wilfred Bonney, HL7 HQ
x Jane Curry, Co-Chair
Tim Ireland, Co-chair
x Lynn Laakso, HL7 HQ Tooling Support
x Andy Stechishin, Co-chair
Quorum Requirements Met (co-chair plus 3 counting staff): yes

Agenda

Agenda Topics



Supporting Documents

Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Discussion on Tooling Challenge and email thread from cochairs on Tooling Challenge process; describe what we think the process is for evaluating. Need budgeting discussion first week of march, and StrucDocs and Vocab requirements discussions later in the cycle. UML profile with MIF static model binding for the stuff that's not there using the profile extension language. Means we have to pull in static model, vocabulary and datatypes model - at concept domain or implementable level in UML but $4k may not be enough. Might be enough to start, though. Where do you draw the line? One must have Model structure, vocab binding structure and datatype binding structure, referencing other MIF files to be successful. Need to describe the problem and offer award for defining UML profile for what can be defined and identifying extensions in UML needed to complete the task. For the HL7 stereotyping UML artifacts in Enterprise Architect suggestion, as proof of concept of the UML profile. How would we describe what makes a solution successful? EA can accept UML profiles (theoretically) so one must describe a UML profile to the extent possible (rather than expect a complete representation of a MIF static model) and demonstrate using EA to apply the resulting UML profile. How far can we push this tool to complete the MIF models and related models that this product can accept? Producing an XMI transform once you have the UML profile is not so difficult.

  • Andy arrives 10:17 AM and quorum is achieved.
  • Jane reviews proposed changes to the HL7 Tooling Challenge wiki page.
  • Andy moves approval of the proposed Tooling Challenge. Lynn seconds. Motion passes.

Adjourned 11:10AM EST


Meeting Outcomes

Actions
  • Jane will send the proposed challenge to John for approval, cc Andy and once approved it will go out in the e-News.
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
  • Jane will be offline until the 20th.


Return to Tooling


© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.