This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

2017-09-27 SGB Conference Call

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

back to Standards Governance Board main page

HL7 SGB Minutes

Location:
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/538465637

Date: 2017-09-27
Time: 10:00 AM Eastern
Facilitator Paul/Calvin Note taker(s) Anne
Attendee Name


x Calvin Beebe
Regrets Lorraine Constable
Russ Hamm
x Tony Julian
x Paul Knapp
x Austin Kreisler
Regrets Wayne Kubick
x Thom Kuhn
Ken McCaslin
x Rik Smithies
Sandy Stuart
Quorum: Chair + 4

Agenda

  • Agenda review
  • Approve Minutes of 2017-08-30_SGB_Conference_Call
  • Approve Minutes of 2017-09-10_SGB_WGM_Agenda
  • Approve Minutes of 2017-09-15 SGB_WGM_Agenda
  • Action Items
    • Update the M&C boilerplate for management groups for how they implement the precepts
    • Recommend to TSC to work with CTO on architecture and tooling strategy to support the work of the committees in following the precepts
    • Anne to send out FHIR Life Cycle Governance document
    • Schedule joint meeting with FGB for precept review
      • Invite Tooling to October SGB call
    • Ask Vocab to approve a motion that it was the WG’s intention in R3 for the Expansion profile to be balloted as STU. If PA has not documented approval, send them the same message
    • Paul to verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
    • Draft of precept on ballot level approvals will need to be created, reviewed and approved before January NIBs are due
    • Additional precepts are to be developed on:
      • How groups are to interact with Publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc. WGs
      • Engaging the implementer community in the consideration of changes as artifacts mature
      • Engagement in large cross-organizational projects
      • How management groups document, enforce, and manage the precepts regarding inter-WG participation in artifact creation
      • Management groups must establish in writing a refinement of examples that adhere to the definition of substantive change that apply to their product family. Must monitor, audit, and measure conformance to the definition of substantive change.
      • The addition of new tools (with EST)
  • Discussion Topics
    • Payer member for CDAMG
    • Backwards compatibility consistency and definition across families
    • Continued review of mixed ballot content precept
  • Parking Lot

Minutes

  • Agenda review
    • Add creation of 6-12 month plan for SGB
  • Approve Minutes of 2017-08-30_SGB_Conference_Call
    • MOTION to approve: Austin/Rik
    • VOTE: all in favor
  • Approve Minutes of 2017-09-10_SGB_WGM_Agenda
    • MOTION to approve: Calvin/Austin
    • VOTE: all in favor
  • Approve Minutes of 2017-09-15 SGB_WGM_Agenda
    • MOTION to approve: Calvin/Rik
    • VOTE: all in favor
  • Action Items
    • Update the M&C boilerplate for management groups for how they implement the precepts
      • Edited boilerplate to include language in objectives section. Discussion over how to implement this. Discussion over potential GOM changes; for example, SGB does not exist in the GOM yet. Calvin: We've never framed when these need to be enforced. When do the developers start adhering to the precepts?
        • ACTION: Review the GOM with respect to where the SGB and precepts should be reflected.
        • ACTION: Add discussion on precept implementation strategy to upcoming agenda.
    • Recommend to TSC to work with CTO on architecture and tooling strategy to support the work of the committees in following the precepts
    • Anne to send out FHIR Life Cycle Governance document
      • Complete
    • Schedule joint meeting with FGB for precept review
      • Invite Tooling to October SGB call
    • Ask Vocab to approve a motion that it was the WG’s intention in R3 for the Expansion profile to be balloted as STU. If PA has not documented approval, send them the same message
      • Add for next week
    • Paul to verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
      • Add for next week
    • Draft of precept on ballot level approvals will need to be created, reviewed and approved before January NIBs are due
    • Additional precepts are to be developed on:
      • How groups are to interact with Publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc. WGs
      • Engaging the implementer community in the consideration of changes as artifacts mature
      • Engagement in large cross-organizational projects
      • How management groups document, enforce, and manage the precepts regarding inter-WG participation in artifact creation
      • Management groups must establish in writing a refinement of examples that adhere to the definition of substantive change that apply to their product family. Must monitor, audit, and measure conformance to the definition of substantive change.
      • The addition of new tools (with EST)
  • Discussion Topics
    • Reviewed FHIR Life Cycle Governance document
      • Suggestion that governance be replaced with management. Austin asks if we took FHIR out and made it generic, wouldn't these apply broadly to other standards? Group works on editing document to make it generic.
        • ACTION: Rik to edit the remaining items in the document for review next week
        • ACTION: Anne to add to next week's agenda for review/discussion
    • Payer member for CDAMG
      • Group to review resume and bring back next week.
      • Austin notes we should also nominate Andrew Statler who attended the meeting in San Diego
        • ACTION: Add to top of next week's agenda
    • Backwards compatibility consistency and definition across families
    • Continued review of mixed ballot content precept
      • Group reviews current draft and edits.
        • ACTION: Add further review to next week's agenda
  • Parking Lot

Meeting Outcomes

Actions
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items

© 2017 Health Level Seven® Inter