This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "MCCI R2"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Rene spronk (talk | contribs) |
Rene spronk (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{INM Workitem}} | ||
| + | |||
MCCI R2 refers to Release 2 of the MCCI domain. The MCCI domain describes the [[Transmission Wrapper]], the [[Trigger Event]], and core [[CPM]]s. | MCCI R2 refers to Release 2 of the MCCI domain. The MCCI domain describes the [[Transmission Wrapper]], the [[Trigger Event]], and core [[CPM]]s. | ||
*See [[MCCI/CACT R2 Project]] for the project plan and scope of MCCI R2, which will be committee balloted in January 2008. | *See [[MCCI/CACT R2 Project]] for the project plan and scope of MCCI R2, which will be committee balloted in January 2008. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Prior Decisions== | ||
| + | |||
| + | See [[Batch Topic DSTU R1 Issues]] for all issues/motions related to Batch Wrappers. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *MCCI R2 C1 reconciliation package contains agreed upon changes. | ||
| + | *[[Accept Level Acknowledgement]] | ||
| + | *[[Error Location]] | ||
| + | *[[Harmonization: add priorTransmission to support Transmission Sequencing]], [[Sequence Number Protocol]] | ||
| + | *[[Transmission.id]] | ||
| + | *Referencing attachments, [[Use of ID/IDREF]] | ||
| + | *(closed) There is an action item for INM from Vocab: "Vocab TC recommends to INM and MnM that Trigger Events and Interation IDs become coded attributes with INM to determine what the datatype should be for them." | ||
| + | **20070109 WGM: INM realizes that it could be either, but doesn't feel the need to move away away from II. | ||
| + | *(closed, for next release) Editorial: MCCI artefacts labeled as "deprecated" should probably be labeled "for backwards compatibility only". Once they have had that status for 2 normative releases of v3, their status will change to "deprecated". | ||
| + | *(closed, for next release) AcknowledgementDetail.typeCode is optional - should this be mandatory instead ? Contains E, W, or I, a categorization of the acknowledgement code/text. | ||
| + | **Motion to make AcknowledgementDetail.typeCode required (not mandatory), Rene/Andrew, 11-0-0. WGM 2007-01-09 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Open Issues== | ||
| + | |||
| + | *Open issue: information related to [[Transmission SLA]], details of [[Transmission Addressing]]. | ||
| + | *[[Behavioral Contract Wrapper (new wrapper mechanism)]] | ||
| + | *[[Bolus]] in v3 | ||
| + | *[[Composite Message Type (new wrapper mechanism)]] | ||
| + | *[[Constrain Transmission Wrapper]] - Miroslav/SOA | ||
| + | *[[De-blue MessageCommunicationsControl]] | ||
| + | *[[Interaction (new dynamic model)]] | ||
Revision as of 07:46, 28 January 2007
This page documents an INM Workitem, i.e. an issue within scope of the INM Committee that either is still being discussed, or the resolution of which has not yet been included in an INM ballot.
MCCI R2 refers to Release 2 of the MCCI domain. The MCCI domain describes the Transmission Wrapper, the Trigger Event, and core CPMs.
- See MCCI/CACT R2 Project for the project plan and scope of MCCI R2, which will be committee balloted in January 2008.
Prior Decisions
See Batch Topic DSTU R1 Issues for all issues/motions related to Batch Wrappers.
- MCCI R2 C1 reconciliation package contains agreed upon changes.
- Accept Level Acknowledgement
- Error Location
- Harmonization: add priorTransmission to support Transmission Sequencing, Sequence Number Protocol
- Transmission.id
- Referencing attachments, Use of ID/IDREF
- (closed) There is an action item for INM from Vocab: "Vocab TC recommends to INM and MnM that Trigger Events and Interation IDs become coded attributes with INM to determine what the datatype should be for them."
- 20070109 WGM: INM realizes that it could be either, but doesn't feel the need to move away away from II.
- (closed, for next release) Editorial: MCCI artefacts labeled as "deprecated" should probably be labeled "for backwards compatibility only". Once they have had that status for 2 normative releases of v3, their status will change to "deprecated".
- (closed, for next release) AcknowledgementDetail.typeCode is optional - should this be mandatory instead ? Contains E, W, or I, a categorization of the acknowledgement code/text.
- Motion to make AcknowledgementDetail.typeCode required (not mandatory), Rene/Andrew, 11-0-0. WGM 2007-01-09
Open Issues
- Open issue: information related to Transmission SLA, details of Transmission Addressing.
- Behavioral Contract Wrapper (new wrapper mechanism)
- Bolus in v3
- Composite Message Type (new wrapper mechanism)
- Constrain Transmission Wrapper - Miroslav/SOA
- De-blue MessageCommunicationsControl
- Interaction (new dynamic model)
