This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "2017-04-12 SGB Conference Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Agenda) |
|||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
===Agenda=== | ===Agenda=== | ||
*Agenda review | *Agenda review | ||
− | *Review Minutes of [2017-04-05_SGB_Conference_Call] | + | *Review Minutes of [[2017-04-05_SGB_Conference_Call]] |
*Action Items | *Action Items | ||
**Anne to invite new project lead (Mike Davis) for Privacy Cookbook to upcoming call to answer remaining questions | **Anne to invite new project lead (Mike Davis) for Privacy Cookbook to upcoming call to answer remaining questions | ||
Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
**Ownership of content | **Ownership of content | ||
**Differentiation of groups that develop standards and those that don't | **Differentiation of groups that develop standards and those that don't | ||
− | |||
− | |||
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== |
Latest revision as of 21:19, 18 April 2017
back to Standards Governance Board main page
HL7 SGB Minutes |
Date: 2016-04-12 Time: 10:00 AM Eastern | ||
Facilitator | Paul/Calvin | Note taker(s) | Anne |
Attendee | Name
| ||
Calvin Beebe | |||
x | Lorraine Constable | ||
x | Russ Hamm | ||
Tony Julian | |||
Regrets | Paul Knapp | ||
x | Austin Kreisler | ||
x | Wayne Kubick | ||
Mary Kay McDaniel | |||
Ken McCaslin | |||
x | Rik Smithies | ||
no quorum definition |
Agenda
- Agenda review
- Review Minutes of 2017-04-05_SGB_Conference_Call
- Action Items
- Anne to invite new project lead (Mike Davis) for Privacy Cookbook to upcoming call to answer remaining questions
- Mike Davis unavailable; Kathleen Connor will attend today
- Wayne will request that FMG provide documentation to support the requested variance from normal balloting/publishing process
- Anne to invite new project lead (Mike Davis) for Privacy Cookbook to upcoming call to answer remaining questions
- Discussion Topics
- CDA MG Mission and Charter Review and Approval
- Continued discussion on drafting an additional type of ballot comment disposition
- PSS approval process: managing unresponsive cosponsors
- Handling situations where two documents come out of one project
- SGB provider role recruitment - look at descriptions for FMG/FGB
- FHIR Product Director Position Description: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
- Mixed ballot content issue
- Parking Lot
- Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities
- Vocabulary precepts
- General precepts
- Precept around training WGs in CDA methodology and management principles
- Levels of standards
- Separation of concerns
- Ownership of content
- ISM
- Ownership of content
- Differentiation of groups that develop standards and those that don't
Minutes
- Agenda review
- Review Minutes of [2017-04-05_SGB_Conference_Call]
- MOTION to approve: Lorraine/Rik
- VOTE: all in favor
- Action Items
- Anne to invite new project lead (Mike Davis) for Privacy Cookbook to upcoming call to answer remaining questions
- Mike Davis unavailable; Kathleen Connor will attend today
- Wayne will request that FMG provide documentation to support the requested variance from normal balloting/publishing process
- Waiting for Grahame to complete
- Anne to invite new project lead (Mike Davis) for Privacy Cookbook to upcoming call to answer remaining questions
- Discussion Topics
- CDA MG Mission and Charter Review and Approval
- TSC will discuss where management groups report in Madrid. Discussion over whether or not that relationship needs to be called out in the M&C. Reviewed/edited document. Looked at FMG M&C as reference. Austin suggests that we ask PLA to tweak the CDA M&C to more closely align with FMG M&C objectives. Discussion that FMG should add statement about quality. Austin: Should FMG and PLA get together to rewrite to better align with the BAM, or should we draft a template that all these M&Cs should derive from? Or do we tell them all to make it simpler? Perhaps risks don't belong in the M&C as they are evolving. Wayne states they should align this M&C with FMG and the BAM and we can use these as a template. Lorraine: We should make sure the V2 M&C is also in alignment. Lorraine: We should write a boilerplate objectives section that can be tweaked.
- Russ departs. Quorum lost.
- Decision that they should come up with a more succinct set of objectives that align more closely with the FMG M&C. If there are suggested changes to the FMG objectives (such as adding quality) we can recommend that FMG updates theirs. Goal was to get this moving at Madrid - do we still think there will be time? Lorraine: We can come up with the boilerplate and alignment until after the group is stood up. Austin: Suggest we discuss further next week after reviewing 2.x M&C.
- ACTION: Anne to send all three out to SGB list for review. Create document with the three sets of objectives on one page plus the BAM objectives (responsibilities).
- Reviewed risks section. Discussion why risks aren't just in the SWOT. These should perhaps be significant high level risks and lower level risks could be in the SWOT. Austin: Feedback is that PLA should focus on high level persistent risks. Lorraine: Lower level risks should be carved out and saved for the SWOT. Perhaps we keep just the first two sentences and put the list in the SWOT. Austin: We should define that management groups are required to maintain a risk registry or list of risks for the product family that is reviewed regularly. Wayne: Perhaps at every WGM. Anne adds sentence on reviewing regularly per the SGB precept on vitality assessment.
- ACTION: Write/post precept on vitality assessment
- Reviewed structure section and made edits. Discussion over constraints on membership - may need to wait until TSC discussion on reporting structure. Wayne suggests changing the word reporting to accountability.
- ACTION: Present to PLA on next call
- TSC will discuss where management groups report in Madrid. Discussion over whether or not that relationship needs to be called out in the M&C. Reviewed/edited document. Looked at FMG M&C as reference. Austin suggests that we ask PLA to tweak the CDA M&C to more closely align with FMG M&C objectives. Discussion that FMG should add statement about quality. Austin: Should FMG and PLA get together to rewrite to better align with the BAM, or should we draft a template that all these M&Cs should derive from? Or do we tell them all to make it simpler? Perhaps risks don't belong in the M&C as they are evolving. Wayne states they should align this M&C with FMG and the BAM and we can use these as a template. Lorraine: We should make sure the V2 M&C is also in alignment. Lorraine: We should write a boilerplate objectives section that can be tweaked.
- CDA MG Mission and Charter Review and Approval
- For next time: Combined objective review and Madrid WGM planning
- Also move to next week:
- Continued discussion on drafting an additional type of ballot comment disposition
- PSS approval process: managing unresponsive cosponsors
- Handling situations where two documents come out of one project
- SGB provider role recruitment - look at descriptions for FMG/FGB
- FHIR Product Director Position Description: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
- Mixed ballot content issue
- Adjourned at 11:02 Eastern
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2017 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved