Fundamental Principles of FHIR

Category:FHIR Discussion

Precepts are (Ron - insert language explaining precepts here)

See also Establishing Precepts in HL7

See Also FHIR Governance Precepts for early FGB start at a precepts spread sheet

FHIR prioritizes implementation

This is the most fundamental precept of FHIR. Most other principles and precepts exist to support this objective.

Rationale: Standards that don't get implemented (or are implemented poorly) benefit no-one. Standards that place theoretical correctness, clinical appropriateness, modeling approach, preferred architecture or any other priority above implementability are unlikely to see significant adoption and thus will produce little overall benefit. That doesn't mean that other considerations can't be taken into account, only that implementability must remain the primary objective.

FHIR provides a scaleable framework for interoperability

(Need caveats around what scalablility means and framework)

FHIR is free

All information that is essential to developing and implementing systems that can communicate using FHIR should be available to all interested parties without cost

Rationale: FHIR is a standard that supports interoperability in spaces within which HL7 has not traditionallybeen involved. As a result, many of those who will need the standard are not members, and would be unlikely to become members in order to see if FHIR is relevant/right for them. As well, many implementers and governmental projects are reluctant to make use of standards that aren't freely available. Interoperability standards benefit from a network effect - the more broadly they're supported, the more useful they are.

FHIR supports the breadth and edge cases of healthcare while keeping the common things simple

FHIR generally follows the Pareto principle in that the core FHIR standard will be 20% of the size of Version 3 but will standardize the most-common 80% of healthcare data, workflow, and related challenges. The remaining 20% represent more realm- or speciality-centric issues.

FHIR supports multiple exchange paradigms/architectures

The continuing evolution of computing and communications technology demands that standards such as FHIR are flexible and capable of being implemented in those technologies selected by the implementers. This variety includes approaches to security, transport, and persistence, and can make use of REST/Documents/Messaging/Services, etc.

FHIR leverages web technologies

HOW IS THIS DIFFERENT from the item above??

FHIR makes versions transparent at the instance level

Versioning gets managed at the conformance level

(LLOYD (or someone, I (Woody) ind the "goodness" of this assertion difficult to state. Need to wordsmith)

Support tooling requirements are mainstream and minimal

Easy implementability in FHIR derives in part a suite of reference implementations, and the expression of the specification in "processable" artifacts. For these attributes to be sustainable, the tools used by the developers and implementers must be current, mainstream technologies with little additional "baggage" when they are adopted.

Leverages open source development principles

Participation in the development, support and standardization has and should continue to involve an array of volunteers, not all of whom will be HL7 members, who participate because they believe that FHIR provides value to both themselves and to the international health care community. More formally,

Open Collaboration is "any system of innovation or production that relies on goal-oriented yet loosely coordinated participants, who interact to create a product (or service) of economic value, which they make available to contributors and non-contributors alike". (from)

• see 20140415_FGB_concall