This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "PCCR-009-Reason in Response Model"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{ChangeRequestMeta | id = PCCR-009 | desc = Reason in Response Model | by = Results from analysis "Evaluating HL7 Care Provision DSTU" | on = 2010-10-05 | status = approved | pr...") |
|||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
== Resolution == | == Resolution == | ||
| + | The reason relationship is in D-MIM and refers to a clinical statement allowing all kinds of expressions to be included in the message. | ||
== Tags == | == Tags == | ||
== Revision History of this Change Request == | == Revision History of this Change Request == | ||
Revision as of 23:33, 17 January 2012
| ID | PCCR-009 |
| Description | Reason in Response Model |
| Submitted by | Results from analysis "Evaluating HL7 Care Provision DSTU" |
| Submitted date | 2010-10-05 |
| Status | approved |
| Priority | medium |
 |
Please note:
Back to Patient Care Change Requests page.
|
Contents
Issue
In the response model the reason why a care provision started is missed. Also additional query topics should be added.
Recommendation
Add "reason" why Care Provision started in Response model
Patient Care Topic / Artefact
Care Record Query
Rationale
Discussion
Recommended Action Items
Resolution
The reason relationship is in D-MIM and refers to a clinical statement allowing all kinds of expressions to be included in the message.
