This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "20110608 SAIF AP ConCall"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 26: Line 26:
 
'''1865: '''Determine what steps needs to be completed to acquire the EA software<br\>
 
'''1865: '''Determine what steps needs to be completed to acquire the EA software<br\>
 
'''Jane''', is this complete?  What is the next step?<br\>
 
'''Jane''', is this complete?  What is the next step?<br\>
 +
Today's Update: <br\>
 +
Jane gathered TSC approval for the proposed process.<br\>
 +
Joshua Carmody (HQ Staff) owns the key management duties.<br\>
 +
Breifly summarizing some of the tasks in the process:<br\>
 +
A project scope statement is required.<br\>
 +
Request a key from Josh<br\>
 +
A permanent key will be provided to the appropriate people.<br\>
 +
OO Example:  OO co-chair sends an email of the name of the project, names and emails for the people that need a permanent key.<br\>
 +
For now, it will reside in Tooling, in GForge, with other Tooling document.  It may be a cochair resource.<br\>
 +
Lorraine:  As part of the OO work, she started a document of how to get EA for a project.  This document may also need to reside with Tooling project documents<br\>
 
<br\>
 
<br\>
 
'''1868:''' Determine how to actually get the EA Software to the modelers. <br\>
 
'''1868:''' Determine how to actually get the EA Software to the modelers. <br\>
 
'''Dave''' has Patrick as the owner.  Is this correct or should it be Jane based on her work with Sparx?<br\>
 
'''Dave''' has Patrick as the owner.  Is this correct or should it be Jane based on her work with Sparx?<br\>
 +
Today's Update: This can be closed.  The process is documented in the EA Process document (tracker 1865)<br\>
 
<br\>
 
<br\>
 
'''1894: '''Team to review the SAIF and Sound White paper <br\>
 
'''1894: '''Team to review the SAIF and Sound White paper <br\>
 
Last update: From 2011-05-11 meeting:  Perhaps defer publication of this until the SAIF Artifacts definition has been completed (targeted for May), since the Artifacts are referenced in the White Paper.<br\>
 
Last update: From 2011-05-11 meeting:  Perhaps defer publication of this until the SAIF Artifacts definition has been completed (targeted for May), since the Artifacts are referenced in the White Paper.<br\>
 
'''Jane: '''What is the status of the SAIF Artifacts Definition?<br\>
 
'''Jane: '''What is the status of the SAIF Artifacts Definition?<br\>
 +
Today's Update: New target completion date:  September, 2011.<br\>
 
<br\>
 
<br\>
 
'''1914: '''Talk to publishing regarding a quality dashboard visible for the balloted item - Austin/Gregg<br\>
 
'''1914: '''Talk to publishing regarding a quality dashboard visible for the balloted item - Austin/Gregg<br\>
 
'''Gregg: '''What is the status? Raised on the [[V3_Publishing_ConCall_Minutes_20110506|May 6 Publishing Call]]<br\>
 
'''Gregg: '''What is the status? Raised on the [[V3_Publishing_ConCall_Minutes_20110506|May 6 Publishing Call]]<br\>
 +
Today's Update: Issues were raised in the Publishing call, but not addressed.  Continued work with between Publishing TSC is needed.<br\>
 
<br\>
 
<br\>
 
'''1944:''' Should a SAIF Governance document be created via the SAIF Pilot Coordination Project? <br\>
 
'''1944:''' Should a SAIF Governance document be created via the SAIF Pilot Coordination Project? <br\>
 
While detailing out the SAIF Coordination project schedule, Rick and Dave wanted the team to discuss if we need to create a new project or GForge tracker item to create a SAIF Governance document.  If so, what should the document create?<br\>
 
While detailing out the SAIF Coordination project schedule, Rick and Dave wanted the team to discuss if we need to create a new project or GForge tracker item to create a SAIF Governance document.  If so, what should the document create?<br\>
 
'''Team: '''Thoughts?<br\>
 
'''Team: '''Thoughts?<br\>
 +
Today's Update: No update
  
  
  
 
[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/saif-arch-pgm/tracker/?action=&br_trackerssort_by=tracker.DESCRIPTION&br_trackerssort_order=asc Link to the Complete List of Action Items/Issues/Risks (GForge)]
 
[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/saif-arch-pgm/tracker/?action=&br_trackerssort_by=tracker.DESCRIPTION&br_trackerssort_order=asc Link to the Complete List of Action Items/Issues/Risks (GForge)]

Revision as of 17:57, 8 June 2011

SAIF Architecture Program – 2011-06-08 Meeting

Return to SAIF Architecture Program Wiki Home Page<br\> Return to SAIF AP Meeting Minutes and Agendas


Meeting Logistics

Agenda

  1. Role Call
  2. Agenda Review
  3. Rick to present a summary of Marc Koehn’s SAIF Pilot project report
  4. Governance Discussion
  5. Recurring Agenda Items
    1. Tooling/Enterprise Architecture Update (Jane Curry)
    2. Pilot Coordination updates (Rick Haddorff)
      1. Any new Coordination items? (Team)
  6. Action item review (see below)
  7. Next steps

Action Items to Review

1865: Determine what steps needs to be completed to acquire the EA software<br\> Jane, is this complete? What is the next step?<br\> Today's Update: <br\> Jane gathered TSC approval for the proposed process.<br\> Joshua Carmody (HQ Staff) owns the key management duties.<br\> Breifly summarizing some of the tasks in the process:<br\> A project scope statement is required.<br\> Request a key from Josh<br\> A permanent key will be provided to the appropriate people.<br\> OO Example: OO co-chair sends an email of the name of the project, names and emails for the people that need a permanent key.<br\> For now, it will reside in Tooling, in GForge, with other Tooling document. It may be a cochair resource.<br\> Lorraine: As part of the OO work, she started a document of how to get EA for a project. This document may also need to reside with Tooling project documents<br\> <br\> 1868: Determine how to actually get the EA Software to the modelers. <br\> Dave has Patrick as the owner. Is this correct or should it be Jane based on her work with Sparx?<br\> Today's Update: This can be closed. The process is documented in the EA Process document (tracker 1865)<br\> <br\> 1894: Team to review the SAIF and Sound White paper <br\> Last update: From 2011-05-11 meeting: Perhaps defer publication of this until the SAIF Artifacts definition has been completed (targeted for May), since the Artifacts are referenced in the White Paper.<br\> Jane: What is the status of the SAIF Artifacts Definition?<br\> Today's Update: New target completion date: September, 2011.<br\> <br\> 1914: Talk to publishing regarding a quality dashboard visible for the balloted item - Austin/Gregg<br\> Gregg: What is the status? Raised on the May 6 Publishing Call<br\> Today's Update: Issues were raised in the Publishing call, but not addressed. Continued work with between Publishing TSC is needed.<br\> <br\> 1944: Should a SAIF Governance document be created via the SAIF Pilot Coordination Project? <br\> While detailing out the SAIF Coordination project schedule, Rick and Dave wanted the team to discuss if we need to create a new project or GForge tracker item to create a SAIF Governance document. If so, what should the document create?<br\> Team: Thoughts?<br\> Today's Update: No update


Link to the Complete List of Action Items/Issues/Risks (GForge)