This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "2018-03-28 SGB Conference Call"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 79: Line 79:
 
*Action Items
 
*Action Items
 
*Discussion Topics
 
*Discussion Topics
**V2MG Mission and Charter Review
+
**Review [http://wiki.hl7.org/images/b/b6/CDA-MG_Call_for_Members_20180316.docx draft of CDAMG call for volunteers]
 +
**Review [http://wiki.hl7.org/images/f/fe/V2-Product-Family-Mission_Final.docx V2MG Mission and Charter]
 
**Review [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=FHIR_Artifact_Governance_Process FHIR artifact governance process]
 
**Review [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=FHIR_Artifact_Governance_Process FHIR artifact governance process]
 +
**Review of project management life cycle spec to see if it talks about project and ballot scope
 +
**Need to make sure that SGB is accurately reflected in the GOM, and figure out what precepts should appear in the GOM
 +
**Review Mission and Charter
 +
**Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities
 +
**Technical Alignments Between Product Families
 +
**How groups are to interact with publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc.
 +
**Precept on bringing in large projects
 +
**Vocabulary - review HTA material for precepts
 +
**Precept for adding new tools (include that WGs with a specific mandate must be involved, such as EST, Publishing, Vocabulary, etc.) - was this covered by the tooling precept we created in New Orleans?
 +
**[http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=List_of_Precepts_Under_Development '''Precepts We Need to Develop''']
 
*Parking Lot
 
*Parking Lot
 +
**BAM guidance on process for product adoption
 +
**Create PRECEPTS that require that it be articulated in the standards how the value sets specified within the standards respond to changes in regulation, licensing, time, etc.- '''to do in April/before Cologne'''
 +
**[http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=FHIR_Product_Director_Page FHIR Product Director Position Description]: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
 +
**Ownership of content
 +
**What precepts do we need to address PSS/profile approval processes of balloting and publishing potentially thousands of CIMI model?
  
 
===Minutes===
 
===Minutes===

Revision as of 21:02, 27 March 2018

back to Standards Governance Board main page

HL7 SGB Minutes

Location:
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/538465637

Date: 2017-MM-DD
Time: 10:00 AM Eastern
Facilitator Paul/Calvin Note taker(s) Anne
Attendee Name


Calvin Beebe
Lorraine Constable
Russ Hamm
Tony Julian
Paul Knapp
Austin Kreisler
Wayne Kubick
Thom Kuhn
Ken McCaslin
Rik Smithies
Sandy Stuart
Quorum: Chair + 4

Agenda

  • Agenda review
  • Approve Minutes of 2018-03-14_SGB_Conference_Call
  • Action Items
  • Discussion Topics
    • Review draft of CDAMG call for volunteers
    • Review V2MG Mission and Charter
    • Review FHIR artifact governance process
    • Review of project management life cycle spec to see if it talks about project and ballot scope
    • Need to make sure that SGB is accurately reflected in the GOM, and figure out what precepts should appear in the GOM
    • Review Mission and Charter
    • Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities
    • Technical Alignments Between Product Families
    • How groups are to interact with publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc.
    • Precept on bringing in large projects
    • Vocabulary - review HTA material for precepts
    • Precept for adding new tools (include that WGs with a specific mandate must be involved, such as EST, Publishing, Vocabulary, etc.) - was this covered by the tooling precept we created in New Orleans?
    • Precepts We Need to Develop
  • Parking Lot
    • BAM guidance on process for product adoption
    • Create PRECEPTS that require that it be articulated in the standards how the value sets specified within the standards respond to changes in regulation, licensing, time, etc.- to do in April/before Cologne
    • FHIR Product Director Position Description: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
    • Ownership of content
    • What precepts do we need to address PSS/profile approval processes of balloting and publishing potentially thousands of CIMI model?

Minutes

Meeting Outcomes

Actions
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items

© 2017 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved