This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "ITS Concall Minutes 20150915"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Astechishin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Category:ITS Minutes 2015 Return to: ITS Main Page > ITS Meeting Minutes > 2015 :Category:ITS Minute...") |
Paul Knapp (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
|align="left" width="40%"|'''Affiliation''' | |align="left" width="40%"|'''Affiliation''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |align="center"| | + | |align="center"| × || Paul Knapp ||align="center"| PK || Knapp Consulting |
|- | |- | ||
|align="center"| × || Dale Nelson ||align="center"| DN || Lantana | |align="center"| × || Dale Nelson ||align="center"| DN || Lantana | ||
Latest revision as of 18:59, 22 September 2015
Return to: ITS Main Page > ITS Meeting Minutes > 2015
Contents
ITS Teleconference - September 15, 2015
| HL7 ITS Meeting Minutes | Date: 2015-09-15 | ||
| Facilitator: Dale Nelson | Note taker(s): Andy Stechishin | ||
| Present | Name | Init | Affiliation |
| × | Paul Knapp | PK | Knapp Consulting |
| × | Dale Nelson | DN | Lantana |
| × | Andy Stechishin | AS | CANA Software & Services |
| × | Brian Pech | BP | Kaiser-Permanente |
| David Booth | DB | Hawaii Group | |
| Quorum Requirements Met: Yes | |||
Agenda
- Role call and agenda
- Approve Minutes of previous meetings September 1
- Announcements
- RDF sub-group report
- Review WGM Agenda
- Approve Minutes of January 2015 WGM
- Approve Minutes of May 2015 WGM
- ITS R1.1 Publishing update
- Review ITS FHIR Tasks
- For discussion:
- Action Items
- Publish HL7 over HTTP DSTU
- PK provided reconciliation to JA (2014-12-09)
- Update ITS R1.1 for publishing
- PK will work to complete for Feb 17 (2015-02-10)
- Update RIM Serialization for Publishing
- Last action: PK will prepare Publication Request for July 22, 2014 teleconference
- Review of Product Briefs
- Publish HL7 over HTTP DSTU
- Next Meeting
- Adjourn
Meeting called to order 2:19 PM Eastern
Discussion of FHIR.org
There was a discussion of fhir.org
At this point AS left the call
Questions from FHIR Infrastructure
- Comments in xml
- Review in Atlanta: comments in XML vs JSON
- Maturity level
- Motion: DN/BP The XML & JSON FMM level be established at FMM3, unless we have assurance that a higher level would not cause issues with respect to the “reason” below. FMM 4 might be considered with those assurances. (unanimous)
- Reason
- Maturity level definition is not precise enough to know whether potentially breaking changes can be made at any level. We are concerned with the notion that comments are not considered part of the content model of a resource, and as such, want to visit the topic in Atlanta. In the event that we recommend comments (and other potentially unknown serialization artifacts) are resource content that needs to be faithfully preserved, we feel the guidance on the ability to make potentially breaking changes in a wire format is not detailed enough for a proper decision.
Meeting adjourned at 3:35 pm Eastern
