Difference between revisions of "2013-01-16 PA WGM Minutes"
m (→Wednesday Q1) |
m (→Wednesday Q2) |
||
| Line 214: | Line 214: | ||
<!-- ********add attendee information here *********--> | <!-- ********add attendee information here *********--> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | X || | + | | X || Line Saele |
| − | |colspan="2"| HL7 | + | |colspan="2"| HL7 Norway |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | X || | + | | X || Helen Drijfhout |
|colspan="2" | HL7 Netherlands | |colspan="2" | HL7 Netherlands | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 226: | Line 226: | ||
|colspan="2"| Kaiser Permanente | |colspan="2"| Kaiser Permanente | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | X || | + | | X || Nat Wong |
| − | |colspan="2"| | + | |colspan="2"| HL7 Australia |
| + | |- | ||
| + | | X || Christian Hay | ||
| + | |colspan="2"| GS1 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="4" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| | |colspan="4" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |colspan="4" |'''Quorum Requirements Met''' (Chair + | + | |colspan="4" |'''Quorum Requirements Met''' (Chair + 2 members): '''Y''' |
|} | |} | ||
<!---======================================================= | <!---======================================================= | ||
| Line 267: | Line 270: | ||
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | '''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | ||
| − | . | + | The WG did not have any v2 work. Therefore we continued to address FHIR issues: <br/> |
| + | Helen moved, even though the concept of the resource name for patient should be subjectOfCare as per ISO standards TS 2220, that the resource name be Patient due to the preponderance of use within the implementation community with “subjectOfCare” as the alias.<br/> | ||
| + | * Comment# 163 - Nat stated that he spoke to Graham about the Agent/Provider. | ||
| + | The requested amendment can easily be implemented with a profile. There does not seem to be a need to constrain the core resource for Provider. Therefore the WG will retain the role attribute cardinality.<br/> | ||
| + | * Comment# 166 – Organization resource definition. Nat had some wording to include people or grouping of organizations. The WG agreed.<br/> | ||
| + | * Comment# 176 – Constraint on Period attribute of Organization Accreditation – WG will remove the “(Date Only)” text and make it constrained.<br/> | ||
| + | * Comment# 181 – Organization does not have a name? – The WG thinks that there might be use cases where an organization has only an ID without a name. In that case, you may only be able to send an ID with no name. Therefore we will add a constraint saying that either Name or ID is sent.<br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Action Item: Constrain the resource to send either ID or Name.<br/> | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Comment# 183 – Referred back to Llloyd to define the codes reference.<br/> | ||
| + | * Comment# 184 – Are we sure that multiple names of an organization is in the 80%. Ease of use, cardinality constrained with a profile.<br/> | ||
===Meeting Outcomes=== | ===Meeting Outcomes=== | ||
| Line 284: | Line 298: | ||
| width="100%" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Actions''' ''<font color="green">(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''</font> | | width="100%" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Actions''' ''<font color="green">(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''</font> | ||
* | * | ||
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
<!---======================================================================= | <!---======================================================================= | ||
| Line 299: | Line 312: | ||
*. | *. | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | |||
==Wednesday Q3== | ==Wednesday Q3== | ||
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" | {|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" | ||
Revision as of 18:30, 24 January 2013
Contents
Wednesday January 16, 2013
Wednesday Q1
| HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes Location: Guest Room 1301 |
Date: 2013-01-16 Time: Wednesday Q1 | ||
| Facilitator | Line Saele | Note taker | Helen Drijfhout |
| Attendee | Name | Affiliation | |
| X | Line Saele | HL7 Norway | |
| X | Toril Reite | HL7 Norway | |
| X | Helen Drijfhout | HL7 Netherlands | |
| X | Christian Hay | GS1 | |
| Quorum Requirements Met (Chair + 2 members): Yes | |||
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- FHIR - Work
Supporting Documents
FHIR FHIR v0.06 Ballot For Comment Material
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
On the agenda is the Provider Registry Presentation from Peter Young.
He gave this presentation Sunday afternoon in the cross-SDO meeting.
Christian thought it was a good idea to repeat that in the PA WG, for we do have a V3 model for Provider Registry.
Peter Young is from OMG.
HSSP context: collaboration between OMG and HL7.
Service Functional Model.
Ratification afterwards by HL7.
Non-secured and secured information.
Non-secured:
Developed an Iphone/IPAD app for searching a service.
Secured:
B2B secure messages.
There is an IHE mechanism for security, but it seems that the Victoria application is not compliant.
Data validation and correction automatically performed in a given interval of time.
See the last slide for website addresses.
Online 09:30:
Peter Young and Brian ?
HSSP is a project from the OMG, in collaboration with HL7, driven by the SLA interest group.
Service Functional Model, being developed by HL7.
Became members of the OMG and responded to the RFP. They have to deliver according to that.
Ken Rubin from HL7 knows all about that.
Today going to the Architecture Board in the OMG to get approvement for the standard, period of 9 months to go for approval.
Also Max Walker, also a member of HL7.
Company is DCA, Database Consultants Australia.
The Victoria system has now gone national, it is an extension of this.
Provider Name, specialties, list the sites where he works.
It's a single service from an interface point of view.
Interdependant registries.
The healthcare service is more strongly projected.
Galen Mulroony: there should be some harmonization between the Interdependent Registry Project and this.
Security mechanism outside the model
Just for updating, who can update what.
Author, Approver, Content Manager (can do both, on a wider scale).
The Interdependant Registries should be dropped and converted to this project.
Galen Mulrooney
On the last page wiki-site, it has the Service Functional Model on it, also a copy of the specficiation and the presentation.
IHE question from Christian:
Issue the got to work through. They responded to the RFP. They looked at the IHE spec and came up with reasons why it is different.
Slides 35/36 of the presentation.
They are members of IHE Australia, participating in XDS project next month.
End of presentation
Discussion:
- Irina is working on the ballot comments. She knows one of the two implementers, they are working on it.
- PA is inviting Galen, to speak with him today about the Interdependent Registry project.
Meeting Outcomes
| Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
Wednesday Q2
| HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes Location: Guest Room #1301 |
Date: 2012-05-16 Time: Wednesday Q2 | ||
| Facilitator | Line Saele | Note taker | Alex de Leon |
| Attendee | Name | Affiliation | |
| X | Line Saele | HL7 Norway | |
| X | Helen Drijfhout | HL7 Netherlands | |
| X | Barry Guinn | EPIC | |
| X | Alex de Leon | Kaiser Permanente | |
| X | Nat Wong | HL7 Australia | |
| X | Christian Hay | GS1 | |
| Quorum Requirements Met (Chair + 2 members): Y | |||
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- V2 Work
Supporting Documents
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
The WG did not have any v2 work. Therefore we continued to address FHIR issues:
Helen moved, even though the concept of the resource name for patient should be subjectOfCare as per ISO standards TS 2220, that the resource name be Patient due to the preponderance of use within the implementation community with “subjectOfCare” as the alias.
- Comment# 163 - Nat stated that he spoke to Graham about the Agent/Provider.
The requested amendment can easily be implemented with a profile. There does not seem to be a need to constrain the core resource for Provider. Therefore the WG will retain the role attribute cardinality.
- Comment# 166 – Organization resource definition. Nat had some wording to include people or grouping of organizations. The WG agreed.
- Comment# 176 – Constraint on Period attribute of Organization Accreditation – WG will remove the “(Date Only)” text and make it constrained.
- Comment# 181 – Organization does not have a name? – The WG thinks that there might be use cases where an organization has only an ID without a name. In that case, you may only be able to send an ID with no name. Therefore we will add a constraint saying that either Name or ID is sent.
Action Item: Constrain the resource to send either ID or Name.
- Comment# 183 – Referred back to Llloyd to define the codes reference.
- Comment# 184 – Are we sure that multiple names of an organization is in the 80%. Ease of use, cardinality constrained with a profile.
Meeting Outcomes
| Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
Wednesday Q3
| HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes Location: Room #2761 |
Date: 2012-05-16 Time: Wednesday Q3 | ||
| Facilitator | Irma Jongeneel | Note taker | Alex de Leon |
| Attendee | Name | Affiliation | |
| X | Irma Jongeneel | HL7 Netherlands | |
| X | Jane Daus | McKesson | |
| X | Barry Guinn | EPIC | |
| X | Alex de Leon | Kaiser Permanente | |
| Quorum Requirements Met (Chair + 4 members): Yes | |||
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- Approve San Antonio Minutes
- Plan next meeting - draft agenda
Supporting Documents
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Alex moved to approve the minutes from San Antonio, Jane seconded. Vote: 2/0/1 The WG continued to draft the agenda. Items to keep in mind were:
- Joint meeting with Patient Care Q2 on Tuesday
- Christian Hay presentation Q4 on Monday
- Service Delivery Location request for a quarter. To be decided upon response from Lise Stevens and Peter Goldschmidt.
Meeting Outcomes
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
Wednesday Q4
| HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes Location: Room# 2761 |
Date: 2012-05-16 Time: Wednesday Q4 | ||
| Facilitator | Irma Jongeneel | Note taker | Alex de Leon |
| Attendee | Name | Affiliation | |
| X | Irma Jongeneel | HL7 Netherlands | |
| X | Jane Daus | McKesson | |
| X | Barry Guinn | EPIC | |
| X | Alex de Leon | Kaiser PermanenteD | |
| X | Wendy Huang | Canada Infoway | |
| Quorum Requirements Met (Chair + 2 members): Yes | |||
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- Harmonization Proposals
- Encounter Link
- IncidentalServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType
- IDENT
- Provider privilege and restriction in the Provider Registry message
Minutes
Encounter Link
- This item will need the participation of Alexander Henket as the modeling facilitator, however, the WG may not move forward with this if Rene Spronke, as the submitter of this comment, retracts his comment, since this was the source of this proposal. Pending response from submitter.
IncidentalServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType
- This concept does not have a definition within the vocabulary. Wendy, as the vocabulary facilitator, brought this to the attention of the workgroup. The WG drafted a definition: Types of service delivery locations that are not originally intended to provide health care services, however is where the event took place. After reviewing, the WG question whether there are needs to have DedicatedServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType and IncidentialServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType, since ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType already supports concepts that may meet the needs. So, the WG needs input from the implementers (those who proposed this) as to what this is. Wendy explained that there will be a concept domain for ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType with these two specializations (DedicatedServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType and IncidentalServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType). The IncidentalServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType does not have a definition, therefore the WG decided to provide one as a, draft. This was provided as a definition and examples:
Types of locations, which are not designed for the purpose of providing health care services, where the care provision takes place.
Examples:
• Accident site
• Patient’s residence
• School
• Work site'
Proposal was made by Alex to accept the definition and examples as defined in the meeting.
Jane seconded.
Vote: 4/0/0
IDENT
- The definition for the IDENT Role class is not clear. The definition currently reads "Roles played by entities and scoped by entities that identify them for various purposes." The WG proposed changing this to "A role for the purposes of providing identifiers that are assigned by a scoping organization."
Meeting Outcomes
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
- Go To Monday Minutes
- Go To Wednesday Minutes
- Go To Wednesday Minutes
- Go To Thursday Minutes
- Return to PA January 2013 WGM
- Return to PA Main Page
© 2013 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.
