Difference between revisions of "2013-01-16 PA WGM Minutes"
m (→Minutes) |
|||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | '''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/> | ||
− | + | On the agenda is the Provider Registry Presentation from Peter Young. <br/> | |
+ | He gave this presentation Sunday afternoon in the cross-SDO meeting. <br/> | ||
+ | Christian thought it was a good idea to repeat that in the PA WG, for we do have a V3 model for Provider Registry. <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | Peter Young is from OMG. <br/> | ||
+ | HSSP context: collaboration between OMG and HL7. <br/> | ||
+ | Service Functional Model. <br/> | ||
+ | Ratification afterwards by HL7. <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | Non-secured and secured information. <br/> | ||
+ | Non-secured: <br/> | ||
+ | Developed an Iphone/IPAD app for searching a service. <br/> | ||
+ | Secured: <br/> | ||
+ | B2B secure messages. <br/> | ||
+ | There is an IHE mechanism for security, but it seems that the Victoria application is not compliant. <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | Data validation and correction automatically performed in a given interval of time. <br/> | ||
+ | See the last slide for website addresses. <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | Online 09:30: <br/> | ||
+ | Peter Young and Brian ? <br/> | ||
+ | HSSP is a project from the OMG, in collaboration with HL7, driven by the SLA interest group. <br/> | ||
+ | Service Functional Model, being developed by HL7. <br/> | ||
+ | Became members of the OMG and responded to the RFP. They have to deliver according to that. <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | Ken Rubin from HL7 knows all about that. <br/> | ||
+ | Today going to the Architecture Board in the OMG to get approvement for the standard, period of 9 months to go for approval. <br/> | ||
+ | Also Max Walker, also a member of HL7. <br/> | ||
+ | Company is DCA, Database Consultants Australia. <br/> | ||
+ | The Victoria system has now gone national, it is an extension of this. <br/> | ||
+ | Provider Name, specialties, list the sites where he works. <br/> | ||
+ | It's a single service from an interface point of view. <br/> | ||
+ | Interdependant registries. <br/> | ||
+ | The healthcare service is more strongly projected. <br/> | ||
+ | Galen Mulroony: there should be some harmonization between the Interdependent Registry Project and this. <br/> | ||
+ | Security mechanism outside the model<br/> | ||
+ | Just for updating, who can update what. <br/> | ||
+ | Author, Approver, Content Manager (can do both, on a wider scale). <br/> | ||
+ | The Interdependant Registries should be dropped and converted to this project. <br/> | ||
+ | Galen Mulrooney<br/> | ||
+ | On the last page wiki-site, it has the Service Functional Model on it, also a copy of the specficiation and the presentation. <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | IHE question from Christian: <br/> | ||
+ | Issue the got to work through. They responded to the RFP. They looked at the IHE spec and came up with reasons why it is different. <br/> | ||
+ | Slides 35/36 of the presentation. <br/> | ||
+ | They are members of IHE Australia, participating in XDS project next month. <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | End of presentation<br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | Discussion: <br/> | ||
+ | * Irina is working on the ballot comments. She knows one of the two implementers, they are working on it. <br/> | ||
+ | * PA is inviting Galen, to speak with him today about the Interdependent Registry project. <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
===Meeting Outcomes=== | ===Meeting Outcomes=== |
Revision as of 18:20, 24 January 2013
Contents
Wednesday January 16, 2013
Wednesday Q1
HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes Location: Guest Room 1301 |
Date: 2013-01-16 Time: Wednesday Q1 | ||
Facilitator | Line Saele | Note taker | Alex de Leon |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | |
X | Alex de Leon | Kaiser Permanente | |
X | Irma Jongeneel | HL7 Netherlands | |
X | Iryna Roy | HL7 Canada | |
X | Barry Guinn | EPIC | |
Quorum Requirements Met (Chair + 4 members): Yes |
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- FHIR - Work
Supporting Documents
FHIR FHIR v0.06 Ballot For Comment Material
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
On the agenda is the Provider Registry Presentation from Peter Young.
He gave this presentation Sunday afternoon in the cross-SDO meeting.
Christian thought it was a good idea to repeat that in the PA WG, for we do have a V3 model for Provider Registry.
Peter Young is from OMG.
HSSP context: collaboration between OMG and HL7.
Service Functional Model.
Ratification afterwards by HL7.
Non-secured and secured information.
Non-secured:
Developed an Iphone/IPAD app for searching a service.
Secured:
B2B secure messages.
There is an IHE mechanism for security, but it seems that the Victoria application is not compliant.
Data validation and correction automatically performed in a given interval of time.
See the last slide for website addresses.
Online 09:30:
Peter Young and Brian ?
HSSP is a project from the OMG, in collaboration with HL7, driven by the SLA interest group.
Service Functional Model, being developed by HL7.
Became members of the OMG and responded to the RFP. They have to deliver according to that.
Ken Rubin from HL7 knows all about that.
Today going to the Architecture Board in the OMG to get approvement for the standard, period of 9 months to go for approval.
Also Max Walker, also a member of HL7.
Company is DCA, Database Consultants Australia.
The Victoria system has now gone national, it is an extension of this.
Provider Name, specialties, list the sites where he works.
It's a single service from an interface point of view.
Interdependant registries.
The healthcare service is more strongly projected.
Galen Mulroony: there should be some harmonization between the Interdependent Registry Project and this.
Security mechanism outside the model
Just for updating, who can update what.
Author, Approver, Content Manager (can do both, on a wider scale).
The Interdependant Registries should be dropped and converted to this project.
Galen Mulrooney
On the last page wiki-site, it has the Service Functional Model on it, also a copy of the specficiation and the presentation.
IHE question from Christian:
Issue the got to work through. They responded to the RFP. They looked at the IHE spec and came up with reasons why it is different.
Slides 35/36 of the presentation.
They are members of IHE Australia, participating in XDS project next month.
End of presentation
Discussion:
- Irina is working on the ballot comments. She knows one of the two implementers, they are working on it.
- PA is inviting Galen, to speak with him today about the Interdependent Registry project.
Meeting Outcomes
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
Wednesday Q2
HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes Location: Guest Room #1301 |
Date: 2012-05-16 Time: Wednesday Q2 | ||
Facilitator | Line Saele | Note taker | Alex de Leon |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | |
X | Iryna Roy | HL7 Canada | |
X | Irma Jongeneel | HL7 Netherlands | |
X | Barry Guinn | EPIC | |
X | Alex de Leon | Kaiser Permanente | |
X | Jane Daus | McKesson | |
Quorum Requirements Met (Chair + 3 members): Y |
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- V2 Work
Supporting Documents
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
.
Meeting Outcomes
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
Wednesday Q3
HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes Location: Room #2761 |
Date: 2012-05-16 Time: Wednesday Q3 | ||
Facilitator | Irma Jongeneel | Note taker | Alex de Leon |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | |
X | Irma Jongeneel | HL7 Netherlands | |
X | Jane Daus | McKesson | |
X | Barry Guinn | EPIC | |
X | Alex de Leon | Kaiser Permanente | |
Quorum Requirements Met (Chair + 4 members): Yes |
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- Approve San Antonio Minutes
- Plan next meeting - draft agenda
Supporting Documents
Minutes
Minutes/Conclusions Reached:
Alex moved to approve the minutes from San Antonio, Jane seconded. Vote: 2/0/1 The WG continued to draft the agenda. Items to keep in mind were:
- Joint meeting with Patient Care Q2 on Tuesday
- Christian Hay presentation Q4 on Monday
- Service Delivery Location request for a quarter. To be decided upon response from Lise Stevens and Peter Goldschmidt.
Meeting Outcomes
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
Wednesday Q4
HL7 Patient Administration Meeting Minutes Location: Room# 2761 |
Date: 2012-05-16 Time: Wednesday Q4 | ||
Facilitator | Irma Jongeneel | Note taker | Alex de Leon |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | |
X | Irma Jongeneel | HL7 Netherlands | |
X | Jane Daus | McKesson | |
X | Barry Guinn | EPIC | |
X | Alex de Leon | Kaiser PermanenteD | |
X | Wendy Huang | Canada Infoway | |
Quorum Requirements Met (Chair + 2 members): Yes |
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- Harmonization Proposals
- Encounter Link
- IncidentalServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType
- IDENT
- Provider privilege and restriction in the Provider Registry message
Minutes
Encounter Link
- This item will need the participation of Alexander Henket as the modeling facilitator, however, the WG may not move forward with this if Rene Spronke, as the submitter of this comment, retracts his comment, since this was the source of this proposal. Pending response from submitter.
IncidentalServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType
- This concept does not have a definition within the vocabulary. Wendy, as the vocabulary facilitator, brought this to the attention of the workgroup. The WG drafted a definition: Types of service delivery locations that are not originally intended to provide health care services, however is where the event took place. After reviewing, the WG question whether there are needs to have DedicatedServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType and IncidentialServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType, since ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType already supports concepts that may meet the needs. So, the WG needs input from the implementers (those who proposed this) as to what this is. Wendy explained that there will be a concept domain for ServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType with these two specializations (DedicatedServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType and IncidentalServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType). The IncidentalServiceDeliveryLocationRoleType does not have a definition, therefore the WG decided to provide one as a, draft. This was provided as a definition and examples:
Types of locations, which are not designed for the purpose of providing health care services, where the care provision takes place.
Examples:
• Accident site
• Patient’s residence
• School
• Work site'
Proposal was made by Alex to accept the definition and examples as defined in the meeting.
Jane seconded.
Vote: 4/0/0
IDENT
- The definition for the IDENT Role class is not clear. The definition currently reads "Roles played by entities and scoped by entities that identify them for various purposes." The WG proposed changing this to "A role for the purposes of providing identifiers that are assigned by a scoping organization."
Meeting Outcomes
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
- Go To Monday Minutes
- Go To Wednesday Minutes
- Go To Wednesday Minutes
- Go To Thursday Minutes
- Return to PA January 2013 WGM
- Return to PA Main Page
© 2013 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.