This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "20110608 SAIF AP ConCall"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 161: Line 161:
 
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/>
 
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/>
  
−
'''SAIF Pilot Coordination Pilot'''
 
−
*SAIF Pilot project has been closed.  Marc Koehn produced a wrap up report for that project.
 
−
*Perhaps a quick summary of the report presented to the SAIF AP team is a good step.
 
  
−
*Dave has entered the SAIF Pilot Coordination project schedule. He has exported it into an Excel file, which is available in the SAIF AP GForge docs area, linked from the SAIF AP Wiki page.
+
'''Summary of Marc Koehn’s SAIF Pilot project report'''<br/>
 +
*Rick reviewed the EA_IPClosureReport created by Marc Koehn.
 +
*Dave will add the link to this document on the SAIF AP Wiki page
  
−
'''Review Project List'''
+
*The document discusses the process used during the alpha projects.  The team documented findings and conclusions.
−
*The group felt they weren’t ready to evaluate the project list as we’re not clear of how the functional models and informational models will change.
+
*This document may help our team determine what to focus on.
−
*Rick: It may be better to focus on one or two projects, because at some point, everything should fall under SAIF in some way.
 
−
*Steve: If you ask a project to be a candidate to be a SAIF AP project, what is the objective to be a SAIF AP project?  What are you expected to do?  We ran into the same problem last year with the SAIF Alpha projects…people weren’t sure of what they were supposed to do.  Do we as a SAIF AP team, have a clear understanding (say like a checklist) of what would indicate a project would be a good candidate to be a SAIF project?
 
−
*EHR Functional Model seems to be a good candidate project.
 
  
 +
*The document referenced the OO Composite Order project as the project to expand on SAIF work.
 +
*Lorraine added that MnM’s work on Artifact Definition also is expanding on SAIF work.
  
−
*Next Step: Wait to discuss with Austin and present the concerns brought forward today.
+
'''OO Composite Order Project Update (Lorriane)'''<br/>
−
**What is the criteria for a project to be a candidate under the SAIF projects? Perhaps we need to create a checklist that will result in listing the criteria.
+
*OO did complete the PSS work on the three projects:
−
**What is the expected product (or exit criteria) from the projects brought in under the SAIF umbrella.
+
*Lab order; composite order, behavioral framework
 +
*OO approved the PSS’s in Orlando.
 +
 
 +
*Within the projects, OO has created a draft of the next level Conceptual Model
 +
 
 +
*Project conference calls will begin around June 22nd.
 +
*The initial focus will be to work on the modeling pieces
 +
 
 +
*Jane expressed concern that the OO projects have to focus on the non-SAIF work, and that it may be difficult to progress in a timely manner by adding SAIF work on top of the non-SAIF work.
 +
 
 +
*Rick indicated that the SAIF Pilot Coordination could assist by offloading some of the SAIF work that OO would need to do.
 +
 
 +
'''Governance'''<br/>
 +
*Jane:  The Quality PSS helped identify risks that lie ahead for SAIF AP work.
 +
*Gregg: The Strategic Initiatives document should focus on the risks that SAIF is encountering and trying to resolve.  
 +
*Jane: Perhaps we should take a look at the emerging Strategic Initiatives for next year and comment on them in regards to the risks the SAIF work is encountering.  Utlimately, the future Strategic Initiatives may drive SAIF governance.
 +
*Suggested Process:  Take the Strategic Initiatives document and identify which points in the process that we need to have oversight and what type of oversight and where does that oversight come from.
  
  
Line 182: Line 196:
 
http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/account/?action=UserAdd
 
http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/account/?action=UserAdd
  
−
''Adjourned 10:55 AM Eastern Time
+
''Adjourned 11:02 AM Eastern Time

Revision as of 18:01, 8 June 2011

SAIF Architecture Program – 2011-06-08 Meeting

Return to SAIF Architecture Program Wiki Home Page<br\> Return to SAIF AP Meeting Minutes and Agendas


Meeting Logistics

Agenda

  1. Role Call
  2. Agenda Review
  3. Rick to present a summary of Marc Koehn’s SAIF Pilot project report
  4. Governance Discussion
  5. Recurring Agenda Items
    1. Tooling/Enterprise Architecture Update (Jane Curry)
    2. Pilot Coordination updates (Rick Haddorff)
      1. Any new Coordination items? (Team)
  6. Action item review (see below)
  7. Next steps

Action Items to Review

1865: Determine what steps needs to be completed to acquire the EA software<br\> Jane, is this complete? What is the next step?<br\> Today's Update: <br\> Jane gathered TSC approval for the proposed process.<br\> Joshua Carmody (HQ Staff) owns the key management duties.<br\> Breifly summarizing some of the tasks in the process:<br\> A project scope statement is required.<br\> Request a key from Josh<br\> A permanent key will be provided to the appropriate people.<br\> OO Example: OO co-chair sends an email of the name of the project, names and emails for the people that need a permanent key.<br\> For now, it will reside in Tooling, in GForge, with other Tooling document. It may be a cochair resource.<br\> Lorraine: As part of the OO work, she started a document of how to get EA for a project. This document may also need to reside with Tooling project documents<br\> <br\> 1868: Determine how to actually get the EA Software to the modelers. <br\> Dave has Patrick as the owner. Is this correct or should it be Jane based on her work with Sparx?<br\> Today's Update: This can be closed. The process is documented in the EA Process document (tracker 1865)<br\> <br\> 1894: Team to review the SAIF and Sound White paper <br\> Last update: From 2011-05-11 meeting: Perhaps defer publication of this until the SAIF Artifacts definition has been completed (targeted for May), since the Artifacts are referenced in the White Paper.<br\> Jane: What is the status of the SAIF Artifacts Definition?<br\> Today's Update: New target completion date: September, 2011.<br\> <br\> 1914: Talk to publishing regarding a quality dashboard visible for the balloted item - Austin/Gregg<br\> Gregg: What is the status? Raised on the May 6 Publishing Call<br\> Today's Update: Issues were raised in the Publishing call, but not addressed. Continued work with between Publishing TSC is needed.<br\> <br\> 1944: Should a SAIF Governance document be created via the SAIF Pilot Coordination Project? <br\> While detailing out the SAIF Coordination project schedule, Rick and Dave wanted the team to discuss if we need to create a new project or GForge tracker item to create a SAIF Governance document. If so, what should the document create?<br\> Team: Thoughts?<br\> Today's Update: No update

Link to the Complete List of Action Items/Issues/Risks (GForge)

Meeting Attendees

X=Present on Call

Facilitator Austin Kreisler Note taker(s) David Hamill
Attendee Name Affiliation
Austin Kreisler TSC Chair
Brian Pech Interested Participant
X David Hamill HL7 HQ / Program Manager
Ed Tripp Domain Experts SD \ TSC
X Gregg Seppala Product Quality Plan Project
X Jane Curry Tooling
Jim McClay Emergency Care
John Moehrke Security Cookbook
John Quinn HL7 CTO
X Lloyd McKenzie MnM Work Group / SAIF Implementation Guide Pjt
X Lorraine Constable Composite Order Pjt \ OO Behavioral Framework Pjt
Patrick Loyd OO Work Group / Composite Order Pjt
X Rick Haddorff Project Services WG / SAIF Pilot Coordination Pjt
Robert Lario Object Management
Steve Hufnagel ArB / SAIF Book Project / SOA
X Wendy Huang Implementation Conformance WG
Gary Dickinson EHR WG
Pat Van Dyke EHR WG
Quorum Requirements Met: Yes

Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:


Summary of Marc Koehn’s SAIF Pilot project report

  • Rick reviewed the EA_IPClosureReport created by Marc Koehn.
  • Dave will add the link to this document on the SAIF AP Wiki page
  • The document discusses the process used during the alpha projects. The team documented findings and conclusions.
  • This document may help our team determine what to focus on.
  • The document referenced the OO Composite Order project as the project to expand on SAIF work.
  • Lorraine added that MnM’s work on Artifact Definition also is expanding on SAIF work.

OO Composite Order Project Update (Lorriane)

  • OO did complete the PSS work on the three projects:
  • Lab order; composite order, behavioral framework
  • OO approved the PSS’s in Orlando.
  • Within the projects, OO has created a draft of the next level Conceptual Model
  • Project conference calls will begin around June 22nd.
  • The initial focus will be to work on the modeling pieces
  • Jane expressed concern that the OO projects have to focus on the non-SAIF work, and that it may be difficult to progress in a timely manner by adding SAIF work on top of the non-SAIF work.
  • Rick indicated that the SAIF Pilot Coordination could assist by offloading some of the SAIF work that OO would need to do.

Governance

  • Jane: The Quality PSS helped identify risks that lie ahead for SAIF AP work.
  • Gregg: The Strategic Initiatives document should focus on the risks that SAIF is encountering and trying to resolve.
  • Jane: Perhaps we should take a look at the emerging Strategic Initiatives for next year and comment on them in regards to the risks the SAIF work is encountering. Utlimately, the future Strategic Initiatives may drive SAIF governance.
  • Suggested Process: Take the Strategic Initiatives document and identify which points in the process that we need to have oversight and what type of oversight and where does that oversight come from.


Gforge Accounts can be requested via: http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/account/?action=UserAdd

Adjourned 11:02 AM Eastern Time

Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=20110608_SAIF_AP_ConCall&oldid=51607"