This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "20150401 PLA call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
| || Rick Haddorff | | || Rick Haddorff | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Tony Julian | + | |x|| Tony Julian |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Paul Knapp | + | |x|| Paul Knapp |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Austin Kreisler, | + | |x|| Austin Kreisler, |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Anne Wizauer | + | |x|| Anne Wizauer |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Mary Kay McDaniel | + | |x|| Mary Kay McDaniel |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Brian Pech | + | |x|| Brian Pech |
|- | |- | ||
| || John Quinn | | || John Quinn | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || John Roberts | + | |x|| John Roberts |
|- | |- | ||
| || Andy Stechishin | | || Andy Stechishin | ||
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
*Charged to draft transition plan with timeline for TSC review | *Charged to draft transition plan with timeline for TSC review | ||
| − | |||
*notional division of products into product families and lines, to provide examples for peer review. | *notional division of products into product families and lines, to provide examples for peer review. | ||
**Level of granularity | **Level of granularity | ||
| Line 99: | Line 98: | ||
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
| − | + | *Reviewed discussion with TSC regarding draft. | |
| − | + | *BAM-lite feedback and review | |
| − | + | *Question of fate of FMG – if SGB replaces FGB, does FMG report to new standards body? Should it fall into a steering division? Austin: Perhaps it would go into T3SD if it were going to go under an SD. Brian: FMG’s role has expanded from its original intent. Mary Kay: Do we have a recommendation of where FMG should be? Lengthy discussion over structure of standards governance board reporting of groups in T3SD if they are actually seen as management groups (publishing, FMG, etc.). Paul suggests that what should happen is that the publishing work that FMG does should go to Publishing. | |
| + | *TSC will have further discussion over M&C this coming Monday; next time we will continue discussion and begin work on timeline. Will meet next week; two weeks from today there may be issues due to HIMSS. | ||
| + | *Mary Kay/Paul will begin work on timeline draft. | ||
===Meeting Outcomes=== | ===Meeting Outcomes=== | ||
| Line 131: | Line 132: | ||
|width="100%" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | |width="100%" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | ||
| − | *[[ | + | *[[20150408 PLA call]] |
|} | |} | ||
© 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved | © 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved | ||
Latest revision as of 19:01, 1 April 2015
return to HL7 Product Line Architecture Meeting Minutes and Agendas
Return to HL7 Product Line Architecture Program
| HL7 PLA Call Minutes Location: Phone: +1 770-657-9270, Participant Code: 985371, |
Date: 2015-mm-dd Time: 2PM | ||
| Facilitator | Mary Kay/ Austin | Note taker(s) | Anne |
| Attendee | Name
| ||
| Regrets | Calvin Beebe | ||
| Woody Beeler | |||
| Lorraine Constable | |||
| Bo Dagnall | |||
| Jean Duteau, | |||
| Rick Haddorff | |||
| x | Tony Julian | ||
| x | Paul Knapp | ||
| x | Austin Kreisler, | ||
| x | Anne Wizauer | ||
| x | Mary Kay McDaniel | ||
| x | Brian Pech | ||
| John Quinn | |||
| x | John Roberts | ||
| Andy Stechishin | |||
| no quorum definition | |||
Agenda
Agenda review
- Notes of 20150318_PLA_call review
- Notes from TSC Review of Mission and Charter
- Charged to draft transition plan with timeline for TSC review
- notional division of products into product families and lines, to provide examples for peer review.
- Level of granularity
- Identify which pieces are orphaned, and the political elements to be surfaced.
- Positioning cross-product family artifacts (standards naming)
- BAM-lite feedback and review
- Governance on V2.x (v2.9 substantive changes)
- develop form to request establishing a Product Family
Minutes
- Reviewed discussion with TSC regarding draft.
- BAM-lite feedback and review
- Question of fate of FMG – if SGB replaces FGB, does FMG report to new standards body? Should it fall into a steering division? Austin: Perhaps it would go into T3SD if it were going to go under an SD. Brian: FMG’s role has expanded from its original intent. Mary Kay: Do we have a recommendation of where FMG should be? Lengthy discussion over structure of standards governance board reporting of groups in T3SD if they are actually seen as management groups (publishing, FMG, etc.). Paul suggests that what should happen is that the publishing work that FMG does should go to Publishing.
- TSC will have further discussion over M&C this coming Monday; next time we will continue discussion and begin work on timeline. Will meet next week; two weeks from today there may be issues due to HIMSS.
- Mary Kay/Paul will begin work on timeline draft.
Meeting Outcomes
| Actions
|
| Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved
