This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "20150304 PLA call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
===============================================================================---> | ===============================================================================---> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Calvin Beebe | + | |x|| Calvin Beebe |
|- | |- | ||
| || Woody Beeler | | || Woody Beeler | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ||Lorraine Constable | + | |x||Lorraine Constable |
|- | |- | ||
| ||Bo Dagnall | | ||Bo Dagnall | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
| || Rick Haddorff | | || Rick Haddorff | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Tony Julian | + | |x|| Tony Julian |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Paul Knapp | + | |x|| Paul Knapp |
|- | |- | ||
| || Austin Kreisler, | | || Austin Kreisler, | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Mary Kay McDaniel | + | |x|| Mary Kay McDaniel |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Brian Pech | + | |x|| Brian Pech |
|- | |- | ||
| || John Quinn | | || John Quinn | ||
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
| || John Roberts | | || John Roberts | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || Andy Stechishin | + | |x|| Andy Stechishin |
|- | |- | ||
| || Anne Wizauer | | || Anne Wizauer | ||
| Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
Agenda review | Agenda review | ||
*Notes of [[20130218_PLA_call]] review | *Notes of [[20130218_PLA_call]] review | ||
| + | *ARB will be joining our call to discuss the BAM | ||
| + | **The following document should inform PLA efforts, ARB would like PLA to review and provide feedback before the ballot for May. | ||
| + | **The document is at http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/hlbam2b/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2F%2Acheckout%2A%2Ftrunk%2Fdocuments%2FBAM_Lite.pdf | ||
| + | |||
*notional division of products into product families and lines, to provide examples for peer review. | *notional division of products into product families and lines, to provide examples for peer review. | ||
**Level of granularity | **Level of granularity | ||
| Line 96: | Line 100: | ||
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
| − | Convened | + | *Convened at 2:05 |
| + | *Tony and Lorraine present as ArB reps to review phase 1 of the BAM that is balloting as an informative doc in May. Wanted to go over what is in this document and what is not. Section 2.2 diagram shows relationship to other BAM projects. Four models in the document: 1) minimal BAM metamodel – like the RIM of the BAM. 2) BAM UML profile, which leads to the 3) product definition diagram, to be read from top to bottom, right to left. Finally, the 4) Product Activity Diagram, which shows the stopping points along the way. Product Planning and Activity diagrams show the order in which things should take place. Product Planning Activity starts at the bottom left. Lorraine notes this model adds a product directorate role. Brian suggests adding directional hints for reading the diagrams. Calvin suggests adding an opening paragraph describing that what is being balloted are the first two steps in the lifecycle stage. Discussion over potential timeline for implementing new governance board. Brian suggests you could stand up a governance group incrementally. Paul amends to say that we’ll have a single governance group that goes through transition to cover all product families. Tony states that ArB is not recommending timing. Paul: should we delay the movement to a single governing body until after this is balloted and reconciled? Lorraine suggests we move ahead with formation and apply the feedback as it comes in. | ||
| + | *Review of Standards Governance Board mission and charter in comparison to responsibilities stated in the BAM. Made appropriate edits to the document. Notable updates: approving the assignment of products to families; approving the establishment of product lines; recommendations for the establishment of new management and/or methodology groups will be sent to the TSC from the SGB for approval; maintain a complete listing of products to product families and products to product lines (once the phase II BAM is completed, harmonize the process). Added statement regarding goals. | ||
| + | *Will meet next week; Anne to add to schedule. | ||
| + | |||
Adjourned | Adjourned | ||
Latest revision as of 17:48, 11 March 2015
return to HL7 Product Line Architecture Meeting Minutes and Agendas
Return to HL7 Product Line Architecture Program
| HL7 PLA Call Minutes Location: Phone: +1 770-657-9270, Participant Code: 985371, |
Date: 2015-03-04 Time: 2PM | ||
| Facilitator | Mary Kay/ Austin | Note taker(s) | Anne |
| Attendee | Name
| ||
| x | Calvin Beebe | ||
| Woody Beeler | |||
| x | Lorraine Constable | ||
| Bo Dagnall | |||
| Jean Duteau, | |||
| Rick Haddorff | |||
| x | Tony Julian | ||
| x | Paul Knapp | ||
| Austin Kreisler, | |||
| x | Mary Kay McDaniel | ||
| x | Brian Pech | ||
| John Quinn | |||
| John Roberts | |||
| x | Andy Stechishin | ||
| Anne Wizauer | |||
| no quorum definition | |||
Agenda
Agenda review
- Notes of 20130218_PLA_call review
- ARB will be joining our call to discuss the BAM
- The following document should inform PLA efforts, ARB would like PLA to review and provide feedback before the ballot for May.
- The document is at http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/hlbam2b/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2F%2Acheckout%2A%2Ftrunk%2Fdocuments%2FBAM_Lite.pdf
- notional division of products into product families and lines, to provide examples for peer review.
- Level of granularity
- Identify which pieces are orphaned, and the political elements to be surfaced.
- Positioning cross-product family artifacts (standards naming)
- BAM-lite feedback and review
- Governance on V2.x (v2.9 substantive changes)
- develop form to request establishing a Product Family
Minutes
- Convened at 2:05
- Tony and Lorraine present as ArB reps to review phase 1 of the BAM that is balloting as an informative doc in May. Wanted to go over what is in this document and what is not. Section 2.2 diagram shows relationship to other BAM projects. Four models in the document: 1) minimal BAM metamodel – like the RIM of the BAM. 2) BAM UML profile, which leads to the 3) product definition diagram, to be read from top to bottom, right to left. Finally, the 4) Product Activity Diagram, which shows the stopping points along the way. Product Planning and Activity diagrams show the order in which things should take place. Product Planning Activity starts at the bottom left. Lorraine notes this model adds a product directorate role. Brian suggests adding directional hints for reading the diagrams. Calvin suggests adding an opening paragraph describing that what is being balloted are the first two steps in the lifecycle stage. Discussion over potential timeline for implementing new governance board. Brian suggests you could stand up a governance group incrementally. Paul amends to say that we’ll have a single governance group that goes through transition to cover all product families. Tony states that ArB is not recommending timing. Paul: should we delay the movement to a single governing body until after this is balloted and reconciled? Lorraine suggests we move ahead with formation and apply the feedback as it comes in.
- Review of Standards Governance Board mission and charter in comparison to responsibilities stated in the BAM. Made appropriate edits to the document. Notable updates: approving the assignment of products to families; approving the establishment of product lines; recommendations for the establishment of new management and/or methodology groups will be sent to the TSC from the SGB for approval; maintain a complete listing of products to product families and products to product lines (once the phase II BAM is completed, harmonize the process). Added statement regarding goals.
- Will meet next week; Anne to add to schedule.
Adjourned
Meeting Outcomes
| Actions
|
| Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved
