This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "2018-08-01 SGB Conference Call"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{subst:: SGB Template}}")
 
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 12: Line 12:
 
| colspan="2" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''HL7 SGB Minutes''' <br/>
 
| colspan="2" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''HL7 SGB Minutes''' <br/>
 
'''Location: ''' <br/>https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/538465637
 
'''Location: ''' <br/>https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/538465637
−
| colspan="2" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Date: 2018-MM-DD'''<br/> '''Time: 10:00 AM Eastern'''
+
| colspan="2" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Date: 2018-08-01'''<br/> '''Time: 10:00 AM Eastern'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| colspan="1" align="right"|'''Facilitator'''
 
| colspan="1" align="right"|'''Facilitator'''
Line 78: Line 78:
 
===Agenda===
 
===Agenda===
 
*Agenda review
 
*Agenda review
−
*Approve Minutes of [[2018-MM-DD_SGB_Conference_Call]]
+
*Approve Minutes of [[2018-07-18_SGB_Conference_Call]]
 
*Action Items
 
*Action Items
 +
**Paul to contact Vocab/PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
 +
***Will then verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
 +
**Paul to ask PH for clarification on the status of items taken out of tracker and then reconciled on spreadsheet/ask for a plan for addressing the issue
 +
**Paul to draft precept on artifact governance
 +
**Paul/Austin to draft survey regarding desire for model-driven approach where a RDAM sits at the top
 +
**Calvin to look for final report that came out of Structured Docs regarding maintaining value sets
 +
**Lorraine/Tony to follow up on RDAM minutes from last steering division call
 +
**Anne to dig up context for agenda item "Degree of documentation for STU vs. Normative resources"
 +
***Originally appeared on 2018-06-13 call as an item added to the agenda; my recollection is that it was added by Paul, but then we didn't get to it and it carried forward
 
*Discussion Topics
 
*Discussion Topics
 +
**Recommendation from FMG to reappoint Brian Pech and Brian Postlethwaite to FMG
 +
**UTG/Vocabulary Governance
 +
***Determine questions for Ted
 +
**Continued discussion: Tasks in step 1 of the BAM
 +
**Normative/continuous balloting in FHIR - determine specific questions before discussing in Baltimore
 +
**SGB Communication Plan
 +
**Large architectures coming in:
 +
***Evaluate PSS process to potentially provide earlier visibility
 +
***How should a product family-type project be documented and reviewed - is PSS enough?
 +
***When it affects cross-organizational methodology, PFMGs need to have a review/say - potential precept
 +
**CIMI-MG followup
 +
**Updates that we do to newer versions of FHIR that are also applicable to older versions
 
*Parking Lot
 
*Parking Lot
 +
**Mapping coordination
 +
***Add link to Confluence page from ARB page
 +
**Review of project management life cycle spec to see if it talks about project and ballot scope
 +
**Review of MG responses to SGB query on substantive change
 +
**Need to make sure that SGB is accurately reflected in the GOM, and figure out what precepts should appear in the GOM
 +
**Review Mission and Charter
 +
**Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities
 +
**Technical Alignments Between Product Families
 +
**How groups are to interact with publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc.
 +
**Precept on bringing in large projects
 +
**Vocabulary - review HTA material for precepts
 +
**Precept for adding new tools (include that WGs with a specific mandate must be involved, such as EST, Publishing, Vocabulary, etc.) - was this covered by the tooling precept we created in New Orleans?
 +
**BAM guidance on process for product adoption
 +
**Create PRECEPTS that require that it be articulated in the standards how the value sets specified within the standards respond to changes in regulation, licensing, time, etc.- '''to do in April/before Cologne'''
 +
**[http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=FHIR_Product_Director_Page FHIR Product Director Position Description]: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
 +
**Ownership of content
 +
**What precepts do we need to address PSS/profile approval processes of balloting and publishing potentially thousands of CIMI model?
  
 
===Minutes===
 
===Minutes===
 +
*Agenda review
 +
**No chair/quorum. Austin’s issue from last time, vocabulary governance, was that vocabulary governance is not currently under SGB. With UTG rollout, we need vocabulary precepts in place.
 +
***ACTION: Add to next week
 +
*Adjourned due to lack of quorum
 +
Carry forward:
 +
*Approve Minutes of [[2018-07-18_SGB_Conference_Call]]
 +
*Action Items
 +
**Paul to contact Vocab/PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
 +
***Will then verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
 +
**Paul to ask PH for clarification on the status of items taken out of tracker and then reconciled on spreadsheet/ask for a plan for addressing the issue
 +
**Paul to draft precept on artifact governance
 +
**Paul/Austin to draft survey regarding desire for model-driven approach where a RDAM sits at the top
 +
**Calvin to look for final report that came out of Structured Docs regarding maintaining value sets
 +
**Lorraine/Tony to follow up on RDAM minutes from last steering division call
 +
**Anne to dig up context for agenda item "Degree of documentation for STU vs. Normative resources"
 +
***Originally appeared on 2018-06-13 call as an item added to the agenda; my recollection is that it was added by Paul, but then we didn't get to it and it carried forward
 +
*Discussion Topics
 +
**Recommendation from FMG to reappoint Brian Pech and Brian Postlethwaite to FMG
 +
**UTG/Vocabulary Governance
 +
***Determine questions for Ted
 +
**Continued discussion: Tasks in step 1 of the BAM
 +
**Normative/continuous balloting in FHIR - determine specific questions before discussing in Baltimore
 +
**SGB Communication Plan
 +
**Large architectures coming in:
 +
***Evaluate PSS process to potentially provide earlier visibility
 +
***How should a product family-type project be documented and reviewed - is PSS enough?
 +
***When it affects cross-organizational methodology, PFMGs need to have a review/say - potential precept
 +
**CIMI-MG followup
 +
**Updates that we do to newer versions of FHIR that are also applicable to older versions
  
  
Line 115: Line 182:
  
 
|width="100%" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/>
 
|width="100%" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/>
−
*[[2018-mm-dd SGB Conference Call]]
+
*[[2018-08-08 SGB Conference Call]]
  
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
© 2018 Health Level Seven® International.  All rights reserved
 
© 2018 Health Level Seven® International.  All rights reserved

Latest revision as of 22:20, 1 August 2018

back to Standards Governance Board main page

HL7 SGB Minutes

Location:
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/538465637

Date: 2018-08-01
Time: 10:00 AM Eastern
Facilitator Paul/Lorraine Note taker(s) Anne
Attendee Name


Calvin Beebe
Lorraine Constable
Russ Hamm
Tony Julian
Paul Knapp
Ewout Kramer
Austin Kreisler
Wayne Kubick
Thom Kuhn
Ken McCaslin
Rik Smithies
Sandy Stuart
Quorum: Chair + 4

Agenda

  • Agenda review
  • Approve Minutes of 2018-07-18_SGB_Conference_Call
  • Action Items
    • Paul to contact Vocab/PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
      • Will then verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
    • Paul to ask PH for clarification on the status of items taken out of tracker and then reconciled on spreadsheet/ask for a plan for addressing the issue
    • Paul to draft precept on artifact governance
    • Paul/Austin to draft survey regarding desire for model-driven approach where a RDAM sits at the top
    • Calvin to look for final report that came out of Structured Docs regarding maintaining value sets
    • Lorraine/Tony to follow up on RDAM minutes from last steering division call
    • Anne to dig up context for agenda item "Degree of documentation for STU vs. Normative resources"
      • Originally appeared on 2018-06-13 call as an item added to the agenda; my recollection is that it was added by Paul, but then we didn't get to it and it carried forward
  • Discussion Topics
    • Recommendation from FMG to reappoint Brian Pech and Brian Postlethwaite to FMG
    • UTG/Vocabulary Governance
      • Determine questions for Ted
    • Continued discussion: Tasks in step 1 of the BAM
    • Normative/continuous balloting in FHIR - determine specific questions before discussing in Baltimore
    • SGB Communication Plan
    • Large architectures coming in:
      • Evaluate PSS process to potentially provide earlier visibility
      • How should a product family-type project be documented and reviewed - is PSS enough?
      • When it affects cross-organizational methodology, PFMGs need to have a review/say - potential precept
    • CIMI-MG followup
    • Updates that we do to newer versions of FHIR that are also applicable to older versions
  • Parking Lot
    • Mapping coordination
      • Add link to Confluence page from ARB page
    • Review of project management life cycle spec to see if it talks about project and ballot scope
    • Review of MG responses to SGB query on substantive change
    • Need to make sure that SGB is accurately reflected in the GOM, and figure out what precepts should appear in the GOM
    • Review Mission and Charter
    • Drafting Shared Product Management Responsibilities
    • Technical Alignments Between Product Families
    • How groups are to interact with publishing, EST, Vocabulary, etc.
    • Precept on bringing in large projects
    • Vocabulary - review HTA material for precepts
    • Precept for adding new tools (include that WGs with a specific mandate must be involved, such as EST, Publishing, Vocabulary, etc.) - was this covered by the tooling precept we created in New Orleans?
    • BAM guidance on process for product adoption
    • Create PRECEPTS that require that it be articulated in the standards how the value sets specified within the standards respond to changes in regulation, licensing, time, etc.- to do in April/before Cologne
    • FHIR Product Director Position Description: we should 1) review further and draft feedback, then 2) map back the description to the role of FGB
    • Ownership of content
    • What precepts do we need to address PSS/profile approval processes of balloting and publishing potentially thousands of CIMI model?

Minutes

  • Agenda review
    • No chair/quorum. Austin’s issue from last time, vocabulary governance, was that vocabulary governance is not currently under SGB. With UTG rollout, we need vocabulary precepts in place.
      • ACTION: Add to next week
  • Adjourned due to lack of quorum

Carry forward:

  • Approve Minutes of 2018-07-18_SGB_Conference_Call
  • Action Items
    • Paul to contact Vocab/PA re: approval items balloting at STU in FHIR R3
      • Will then verify with Karen that the documentation on the FHIR R3 ballot STU approvals is sufficient
    • Paul to ask PH for clarification on the status of items taken out of tracker and then reconciled on spreadsheet/ask for a plan for addressing the issue
    • Paul to draft precept on artifact governance
    • Paul/Austin to draft survey regarding desire for model-driven approach where a RDAM sits at the top
    • Calvin to look for final report that came out of Structured Docs regarding maintaining value sets
    • Lorraine/Tony to follow up on RDAM minutes from last steering division call
    • Anne to dig up context for agenda item "Degree of documentation for STU vs. Normative resources"
      • Originally appeared on 2018-06-13 call as an item added to the agenda; my recollection is that it was added by Paul, but then we didn't get to it and it carried forward
  • Discussion Topics
    • Recommendation from FMG to reappoint Brian Pech and Brian Postlethwaite to FMG
    • UTG/Vocabulary Governance
      • Determine questions for Ted
    • Continued discussion: Tasks in step 1 of the BAM
    • Normative/continuous balloting in FHIR - determine specific questions before discussing in Baltimore
    • SGB Communication Plan
    • Large architectures coming in:
      • Evaluate PSS process to potentially provide earlier visibility
      • How should a product family-type project be documented and reviewed - is PSS enough?
      • When it affects cross-organizational methodology, PFMGs need to have a review/say - potential precept
    • CIMI-MG followup
    • Updates that we do to newer versions of FHIR that are also applicable to older versions


Meeting Outcomes

Actions
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items

© 2018 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved

Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=2018-08-01_SGB_Conference_Call&oldid=159474"