This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "2018-03-28 FMG concall"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|colspan="4" align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| '''yes/no''' | |colspan="4" align="center" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| '''yes/no''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | Co chairs|| ||David Hay || ||Lloyd McKenzie | + | | Co chairs||x ||David Hay ||x ||Lloyd McKenzie |
|- | |- | ||
| ex-officio||.||Wayne Kubick, CTO | | ex-officio||.||Wayne Kubick, CTO | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| colspan="2"| Members ||colspan="2"|Members||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Observers/Guests | | colspan="2"| Members ||colspan="2"|Members||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Observers/Guests | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | || Hans Buitendijk|| ||Brian Postlethwaite || ||Paul Knapp || || Anne W., scribe | + | |x || Hans Buitendijk||x ||Brian Postlethwaite || ||Paul Knapp || x|| Anne W., scribe |
|- | |- | ||
− | | ||Josh Mandel || ||John Moehrke|| ||Brian Pech || || | + | |x ||Josh Mandel || x||John Moehrke||x ||Brian Pech || || |
|- | |- | ||
− | | ||Grahame Grieve || || || || ||.||<!--guest--> | + | |x ||Grahame Grieve || || || || ||.||<!--guest--> |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
==Minutes== | ==Minutes== | ||
+ | *Roll Call | ||
+ | **Lloyd chairing | ||
+ | *Agenda Check | ||
+ | **MOTION to approve: David/Hans | ||
+ | **VOTE: All in favor | ||
+ | *Minutes from [[2018-03-21_FMG_concall]] | ||
+ | **MOTION to approve: Hans/David | ||
+ | **VOTE: Josh abstains. Remaining in favor. | ||
+ | *Action items | ||
+ | **Grahame to reach out to international council re: effectiveness of international IGs | ||
+ | ***Carry forward | ||
+ | **Brian to take VerificationResult resource to Security, OO, Pharmacy, and Attachments to gather input on the notion of Verification and what it would mean | ||
+ | ***Carry forward | ||
+ | **Lloyd will write up some candidate criteria for including IGs in core for review next week | ||
+ | ***Complete. Will review later in the call. | ||
+ | *Review Items | ||
+ | **[https://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/15842/16426/HL7%20Pharmacy%20MedicationKnowledge%20and%20Medication%20Pattern%20PSS%2020180226.docx HL7 Pharmacy MedicationKnowledge and MedicationPattern PSS] | ||
+ | ***Reviewed document. Hans says this sounds like Medication Definition. Need to introduce the term knowledge now - are we going to use that across the board? Lloyd is fine with the design work proceeding but that doesn't mean that we've landed on the resource or set of resources that will come out of it. Discussion over logical model and resource having the same name. Hans suggests removing space from MedicationKnowledge. Discussion over timeline. January 20, 2018 should be 2019. Publish in December 31, 2019 should have a question around it regarding what is being published and how. Is the Medication Logical Model only in the context of FHIR? Discussion over the difference between a domain analysis model and a logical model. Will need to do some thinking regarding how we want to publish these sorts of artifacts. Should clarify that the logical model is FHIR-based. Want to avoid the impression that it's unique to FHIR in its scope and meaning. Should put a question mark in the IG box in section 5. | ||
+ | ****MOTION to approve with proposed amendments and feedback: Hans/John | ||
+ | ****VOTE: All in favor | ||
+ | *Discussion Topics | ||
+ | **[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1j_2HWER5p01_aZNK1GJZkdpQ05c3NRsiGo90V7W7RgE/edit#heading=h.ju6wcrgwyx2f Criteria for inclusion of profiles and valuesets in FHIR Core] | ||
+ | ***Add to next week | ||
+ | *Reports | ||
+ | **Connectathon management (David/Brian) | ||
+ | ***Don't have nearly the set of tracks that we normally have. Grahame notes that there was some confusion about the deadline for proposals and assures that a few more will be coming in. | ||
+ | *Ballot Planning | ||
+ | **QA is nearly complete. Lloyd notes that final freeze for all content is Sunday. Need to get that notification out. David will send out message. Lloyd suggests getting people to commit to what they're going to apply. David edits spreadsheet. Grahame states core is looking good. There are a few structural changes proposed. Has some concerns about some of the IGs. Lloyd: Clinical Genomics has a number of outstanding errors that he is working with. Devices is aware that they have to make some changes. | ||
+ | *Adjourned at 4:52 pm Eastern | ||
===Next Steps=== | ===Next Steps=== |
Latest revision as of 21:31, 28 March 2018
HL7 TSC FMG Meeting Minutes Location: |
Date: 2018-03-28 Time: 4:00 PM U.S. Eastern | |
Chair: | Note taker(s): Anne W. |
Quorum = chair + 4 | yes/no | |||||
Co chairs | x | David Hay | x | Lloyd McKenzie | ||
ex-officio | . | Wayne Kubick, CTO |
Members | Members | Members | Observers/Guests | ||||
x | Hans Buitendijk | x | Brian Postlethwaite | Paul Knapp | x | Anne W., scribe | |
x | Josh Mandel | x | John Moehrke | x | Brian Pech | ||
x | Grahame Grieve | . |
Agenda
- Roll Call
- Agenda Check
- Minutes from 2018-03-21_FMG_concall
- Action items
- Grahame to reach out to international council re: effectiveness of international IGs
- Brian to take VerificationResult resource to Security, OO, Pharmacy, and Attachments to gather input on the notion of Verification and what it would mean
- Lloyd will write up some candidate criteria for including IGs in core for review next week
- Review Items
- Discussion Topics
- Reports
- Connectathon management (David/Brian)
- SGB –
- MnM –
- FMG Liaisons –
- Process management
- Ballot Planning
- Ballot content review and QA process FHIR QA Guidelines
- AOB (Any Other Business)
Minutes
- Roll Call
- Lloyd chairing
- Agenda Check
- MOTION to approve: David/Hans
- VOTE: All in favor
- Minutes from 2018-03-21_FMG_concall
- MOTION to approve: Hans/David
- VOTE: Josh abstains. Remaining in favor.
- Action items
- Grahame to reach out to international council re: effectiveness of international IGs
- Carry forward
- Brian to take VerificationResult resource to Security, OO, Pharmacy, and Attachments to gather input on the notion of Verification and what it would mean
- Carry forward
- Lloyd will write up some candidate criteria for including IGs in core for review next week
- Complete. Will review later in the call.
- Grahame to reach out to international council re: effectiveness of international IGs
- Review Items
- HL7 Pharmacy MedicationKnowledge and MedicationPattern PSS
- Reviewed document. Hans says this sounds like Medication Definition. Need to introduce the term knowledge now - are we going to use that across the board? Lloyd is fine with the design work proceeding but that doesn't mean that we've landed on the resource or set of resources that will come out of it. Discussion over logical model and resource having the same name. Hans suggests removing space from MedicationKnowledge. Discussion over timeline. January 20, 2018 should be 2019. Publish in December 31, 2019 should have a question around it regarding what is being published and how. Is the Medication Logical Model only in the context of FHIR? Discussion over the difference between a domain analysis model and a logical model. Will need to do some thinking regarding how we want to publish these sorts of artifacts. Should clarify that the logical model is FHIR-based. Want to avoid the impression that it's unique to FHIR in its scope and meaning. Should put a question mark in the IG box in section 5.
- MOTION to approve with proposed amendments and feedback: Hans/John
- VOTE: All in favor
- Reviewed document. Hans says this sounds like Medication Definition. Need to introduce the term knowledge now - are we going to use that across the board? Lloyd is fine with the design work proceeding but that doesn't mean that we've landed on the resource or set of resources that will come out of it. Discussion over logical model and resource having the same name. Hans suggests removing space from MedicationKnowledge. Discussion over timeline. January 20, 2018 should be 2019. Publish in December 31, 2019 should have a question around it regarding what is being published and how. Is the Medication Logical Model only in the context of FHIR? Discussion over the difference between a domain analysis model and a logical model. Will need to do some thinking regarding how we want to publish these sorts of artifacts. Should clarify that the logical model is FHIR-based. Want to avoid the impression that it's unique to FHIR in its scope and meaning. Should put a question mark in the IG box in section 5.
- HL7 Pharmacy MedicationKnowledge and MedicationPattern PSS
- Discussion Topics
- Criteria for inclusion of profiles and valuesets in FHIR Core
- Add to next week
- Criteria for inclusion of profiles and valuesets in FHIR Core
- Reports
- Connectathon management (David/Brian)
- Don't have nearly the set of tracks that we normally have. Grahame notes that there was some confusion about the deadline for proposals and assures that a few more will be coming in.
- Connectathon management (David/Brian)
- Ballot Planning
- QA is nearly complete. Lloyd notes that final freeze for all content is Sunday. Need to get that notification out. David will send out message. Lloyd suggests getting people to commit to what they're going to apply. David edits spreadsheet. Grahame states core is looking good. There are a few structural changes proposed. Has some concerns about some of the IGs. Lloyd: Clinical Genomics has a number of outstanding errors that he is working with. Devices is aware that they have to make some changes.
- Adjourned at 4:52 pm Eastern
Next Steps
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date) | |||
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
Back to FHIR_Management_Group
© 2018 Health Level Seven® International