This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "20141029 PLA call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
*Review of invitation to join call | *Review of invitation to join call | ||
*Validate the listserv(s) the invitation will be sent to. | *Validate the listserv(s) the invitation will be sent to. | ||
| + | *Bring forward these basic steps from http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/hlbam2b/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2F%2Acheckout%2A%2Ftrunk%2Fdocuments%2Fbam_section_7_business_architecture.docx&revision=44 in the 3rd page which lists artifacts that need to be generated, potentially on a form, for setting up a product family. Concept proposal: Describe the opportunity (opportunity assessment); describe the market segmentation (checkboxes for stakeholders), describe the business artifacts (conceptexample). Review Proposal: aspiration confirmation, proposal assessment. Create concept recommendation, assess organizational readiness. Scope Recommendation: submit recommendation. Adjudicate recommendation: product decision and scope decision. | ||
| + | *Develop form to request establishing a Product Family | ||
| + | *Schedule joint session at next WGM with TSC, V2.x publishing, CGIT, INM, Lynn to work on step interpretation, process steps, routing. | ||
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
| − | Convened | + | *Convened at 2:09 pm by MaryKay. |
| − | + | *Agenda review. | |
| − | Adjourned | + | *Review of 9/17 meeting notes: Paul wonders about the statement regarding FHIR datatypes laid atop ISO datatypes; group agrees this is not accurate. Noted with today's date that the statement is not correct and point to FHIR specification on datatypes. Motion to approve minutes by Andy; Austin seconds. |
| + | * Reviewed action items from 10/15/2014 | ||
| + | *Reviewed BAM Lite ppt. Extend invitation list to all noted plus co-chairs list - anyone with interest in V2.x welcome to join. Reviewed order of slides and whether order is appropriate. On #8, remove individual components of publishing. Governance: will it be the TSC, or a distinct V2.X governance board? It will be an appointed Board for all families reporting to the TSC, states Paul, and there is also a FHIR WG proposal. Change slide 8 to reflect. Governance will not oversee management group - not a top down structure. All three work together. A circle, not a pyramid to reflect separation of duties. MaryKay adjusted slide to reflect discussion. Do we want to drive call participants to one family or two, or do we want call participants to decide? MaryKay proposes - should there be just one group that does IGs to promote consistent content? Group says no, that really wouldn't be ideal. MaryKay split slides into V2.X Implementation Guide and V2.X Standard. On our next call we will come up with the goal for the conversation with invited guests. MaryKay will update and distribute the ppt for discussion on next meeting. Paul asks do we need guidance from TSC on any of this? Question regarding implementation timeline for TSC. MaryKay will attend call to discuss. Paul will send email to TSC cochairs to alert them to agenda item. | ||
| + | *Adjourned at 3:01 PM | ||
===Meeting Outcomes=== | ===Meeting Outcomes=== | ||
| Line 111: | Line 117: | ||
| width="100%" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Actions''' '' | | width="100%" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Actions''' '' | ||
| − | * | + | *Distribute updated BAM Lite ppt for discussion on next call |
| + | *Determine goal for the conversation on the conference call | ||
| + | *Paul to email TSC cochairs to let them know that MaryKay will attend Monday's TSC call to discuss implementation timeline. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 125: | Line 133: | ||
|width="100%" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | |width="100%" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | ||
| − | *[[ | + | *[[20141112 PLA call]] |
|} | |} | ||
© 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved | © 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved | ||
Latest revision as of 16:27, 31 October 2014
return to HL7 Product Line Architecture Meeting Minutes and Agendas
Return to HL7 Product Line Architecture Program
| HL7 PLA Call Minutes Location: Phone: +1 770-657-9270, Participant Code: 985371, |
Date: 2014-mm-dd Time: 2PM | ||
| Facilitator | Mary Kay/ Austin | Note taker(s) | Anne |
| Attendee | Name
| ||
| Calvin Beebe | |||
| Woody Beeler | |||
| Lorraine Constable | |||
| Bo Dagnall | |||
| Jean Duteau, | |||
| Rick Haddorff | |||
| Tony Julian | |||
| Paul Knapp | |||
| Austin Kreisler, | |||
| Lynn Laakso | |||
| Mary Kay McDaniel | |||
| Brian Pech | |||
| John Quinn | |||
| John Roberts | |||
| Andy Stechishin | |||
| no quorum definition | |||
Agenda
Agenda review
- Notes of 20140917_PLA_WGM review
- Notes of 20141015_PLA_call review
- Review ppt discussion document
- Review of invitation to join call
- Validate the listserv(s) the invitation will be sent to.
- Bring forward these basic steps from http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/hlbam2b/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2F%2Acheckout%2A%2Ftrunk%2Fdocuments%2Fbam_section_7_business_architecture.docx&revision=44 in the 3rd page which lists artifacts that need to be generated, potentially on a form, for setting up a product family. Concept proposal: Describe the opportunity (opportunity assessment); describe the market segmentation (checkboxes for stakeholders), describe the business artifacts (conceptexample). Review Proposal: aspiration confirmation, proposal assessment. Create concept recommendation, assess organizational readiness. Scope Recommendation: submit recommendation. Adjudicate recommendation: product decision and scope decision.
- Develop form to request establishing a Product Family
- Schedule joint session at next WGM with TSC, V2.x publishing, CGIT, INM, Lynn to work on step interpretation, process steps, routing.
Minutes
- Convened at 2:09 pm by MaryKay.
- Agenda review.
- Review of 9/17 meeting notes: Paul wonders about the statement regarding FHIR datatypes laid atop ISO datatypes; group agrees this is not accurate. Noted with today's date that the statement is not correct and point to FHIR specification on datatypes. Motion to approve minutes by Andy; Austin seconds.
- Reviewed action items from 10/15/2014
- Reviewed BAM Lite ppt. Extend invitation list to all noted plus co-chairs list - anyone with interest in V2.x welcome to join. Reviewed order of slides and whether order is appropriate. On #8, remove individual components of publishing. Governance: will it be the TSC, or a distinct V2.X governance board? It will be an appointed Board for all families reporting to the TSC, states Paul, and there is also a FHIR WG proposal. Change slide 8 to reflect. Governance will not oversee management group - not a top down structure. All three work together. A circle, not a pyramid to reflect separation of duties. MaryKay adjusted slide to reflect discussion. Do we want to drive call participants to one family or two, or do we want call participants to decide? MaryKay proposes - should there be just one group that does IGs to promote consistent content? Group says no, that really wouldn't be ideal. MaryKay split slides into V2.X Implementation Guide and V2.X Standard. On our next call we will come up with the goal for the conversation with invited guests. MaryKay will update and distribute the ppt for discussion on next meeting. Paul asks do we need guidance from TSC on any of this? Question regarding implementation timeline for TSC. MaryKay will attend call to discuss. Paul will send email to TSC cochairs to alert them to agenda item.
- Adjourned at 3:01 PM
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
| Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved
