This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "20130903 FGB concall"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{subst::FGB Template}}")
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
 
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"  
 
{|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"  
 
| width="0%" colspan="2" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''HL7 TSC FGB Meeting Minutes''' <br/>
 
| width="0%" colspan="2" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''HL7 TSC FGB Meeting Minutes''' <br/>
 
'''Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371#'''<br/> GoToMeeting ID: [https://www.gotomeeting.com/join/334756981 334-756-981]
 
'''Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371#'''<br/> GoToMeeting ID: [https://www.gotomeeting.com/join/334756981 334-756-981]
| width="0%" colspan="1" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Date: 2013-mm-dd '''<br/> '''Time: 8:00 AM U.S. Eastern'''
+
| width="0%" colspan="1" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Date: 2013-09-03'''<br/> '''Time: 8:00 AM U.S. Eastern'''
 
|-
 
|-
 
| width="0%" colspan="2" align="right"|'''Facilitator''': Ron Parker
 
| width="0%" colspan="2" align="right"|'''Facilitator''': Ron Parker
Line 15: Line 14:
 
|colspan="2"|Chair/CTO ||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Members
 
|colspan="2"|Chair/CTO ||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Members
 
|-
 
|-
| ||Ron Parker|| ||George (Woody) Beeler|| ||Ewout Kramer
+
|x ||Ron Parker|| maybe||George (Woody) Beeler||regrets ||Ewout Kramer
 
|-
 
|-
 
| ||John Quinn ||  ||Grahame Grieve
 
| ||John Quinn ||  ||Grahame Grieve
Line 21: Line 20:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|colspan="2" rowspan="3"|observers/guests
 
|colspan="2" rowspan="3"|observers/guests
| ||Austin Kreisler
+
|regrets ||Austin Kreisler
 
|-
 
|-
|||Lynn Laakso, scribe
+
|x||Lynn Laakso, scribe
 
|-
 
|-
| ||
+
| x||Brian Pech
 
|}
 
|}
  
Line 31: Line 30:
 
*Roll call -  
 
*Roll call -  
 
*Agenda Review
 
*Agenda Review
*Approve minutes of [[2013MMDD FGB concall]]
+
*Approve minutes of [[20130827 FGB concall]]
 
*Action Item review:  
 
*Action Item review:  
 +
**FGB should put something together for elevator pitch and John puts it into his CTO report to the Board
 +
**review and develop assertions with conformity to ISO Datatypes
 +
**Ron develop precepts from the risks
 
*FMG update -  
 
*FMG update -  
 +
**nominations
 
*Methodology update-
 
*Methodology update-
 
<!--*Review precepts, associated governance points and risks
 
<!--*Review precepts, associated governance points and risks
Line 48: Line 51:
  
 
==Minutes==
 
==Minutes==
Convened at
+
*Discussion held without quorum.
 +
*Reviewed action items
 +
**FGB elevator pitch, communications of what it is, and its intended timelines.
 +
**FHIR use of ISO datatypes - methodology issue; need to discuss with Grahame. Need to reach out to him from FGB for statement of conformance and framework to policy for use of ISO datatypes. Grahame's participation on governance board discussed. Need Woody, Grahame, Ron, and Austin/John to be on a call - Ron will schedule.
 +
**Will get back to precepts and risks.
 +
**Ron needs to discuss with John on how to make the FGB a part of the organization to organization relationships on FHIR. Ron will follow up with John to establish such a protocol.
 +
*Precept definition should include conformity assessments, along with other processes such as appeal processes. Remove these standing items from agenda - add to action item. Escalation responsibility is on the group and not to the appellant. Need to start evolving policy. FMG seems to be establishing policy on the fly, where they should be establishing process. What's in, what's out, etc are execution of governance policy. Set agenda on Friday meeting at WGM to tease out the policy statements behind the execution decisions. Escalation of awareness of decisions made on the fly by FMG for review by FGB discussed. Policy statements and premises for action as next steps after balloting also need discussion. Brian adds that the FMG status as 'working group' needs to be resolved. BAM work has started to build a home but needs better structure - need a BAM-lite to document something and create that framework. Ron will bring this to ArB. SDWG corollary would make a good example to tease out governance, management, and methodology activities.
 +
*FGB communication with FMG should mine the last FMG minutes for relevant decision items on which policy statements need to be derived. Perhaps Thursdays Ron and Lynn can review and add to FGB agendas.
 +
*FGB membership - quorum difficulties. Consider including broader perspectives with industry concerns. Good governance gives stakeholders confidence that the processes are conducted with balance to the community.
 +
*Precept for FGB on the composition and criteria of the FMG.
  
*
+
Disconnected at 8:40 AM.
  
 
===Next Steps===
 
===Next Steps===
Line 56: Line 68:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/>
 
|colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/>
*
+
 
 +
*FGB should put something together for elevator pitch and John puts it into his CTO report to the Board
 +
*Ron will schedule Woody, Grahame, Ron, and Austin/John to be on a call to evaluate policy assertions with conformity to ISO Datatypes
 +
*Ron develop precepts from the risks (conformity assessments, appeal processes, composition of FMG)
 +
*Lynn schedule weekly review with Ron to 'mine' FMG minutes for decisions needing underlying policy statements
 +
*Ron will address immediate need for "BAM-lite" with ArB.
 +
*Ron will follow up with John to establish a protocol for FGB chair representation in external stakeholder relationships wrt FHIR.
 +
 
  
 
|-
 
|-
 
|colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/>
 
|colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/>
*[[2013mmdd FGB concall]]
+
*[[20130910 FGB concall]]
  
 
|}
 
|}

Latest revision as of 12:48, 3 September 2013

HL7 TSC FGB Meeting Minutes

Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371#
GoToMeeting ID: 334-756-981

Date: 2013-09-03
Time: 8:00 AM U.S. Eastern
Facilitator: Ron Parker Note taker(s): Lynn Laakso
Quorum = Chair plus 2 yes/no
Chair/CTO Members Members
x Ron Parker maybe George (Woody) Beeler regrets Ewout Kramer
John Quinn Grahame Grieve
observers/guests regrets Austin Kreisler
x Lynn Laakso, scribe
x Brian Pech

Agenda

  • Roll call -
  • Agenda Review
  • Approve minutes of 20130827 FGB concall
  • Action Item review:
    • FGB should put something together for elevator pitch and John puts it into his CTO report to the Board
    • review and develop assertions with conformity to ISO Datatypes
    • Ron develop precepts from the risks
  • FMG update -
    • nominations
  • Methodology update-
  • Next steps: Define and Resource other Governance processes.
    1. Conformity Assessment
    2. Appeal Process / Escalation
      • What is the appeal process for resources not chosen for inclusion in the ballot?
      • What is the appeal / escalation process for Management decisions?
      • What is the appeal / escalation process for Governance decisions? Responsibilities for resources (education, conformity process, appeal process)


Minutes

  • Discussion held without quorum.
  • Reviewed action items
    • FGB elevator pitch, communications of what it is, and its intended timelines.
    • FHIR use of ISO datatypes - methodology issue; need to discuss with Grahame. Need to reach out to him from FGB for statement of conformance and framework to policy for use of ISO datatypes. Grahame's participation on governance board discussed. Need Woody, Grahame, Ron, and Austin/John to be on a call - Ron will schedule.
    • Will get back to precepts and risks.
    • Ron needs to discuss with John on how to make the FGB a part of the organization to organization relationships on FHIR. Ron will follow up with John to establish such a protocol.
  • Precept definition should include conformity assessments, along with other processes such as appeal processes. Remove these standing items from agenda - add to action item. Escalation responsibility is on the group and not to the appellant. Need to start evolving policy. FMG seems to be establishing policy on the fly, where they should be establishing process. What's in, what's out, etc are execution of governance policy. Set agenda on Friday meeting at WGM to tease out the policy statements behind the execution decisions. Escalation of awareness of decisions made on the fly by FMG for review by FGB discussed. Policy statements and premises for action as next steps after balloting also need discussion. Brian adds that the FMG status as 'working group' needs to be resolved. BAM work has started to build a home but needs better structure - need a BAM-lite to document something and create that framework. Ron will bring this to ArB. SDWG corollary would make a good example to tease out governance, management, and methodology activities.
  • FGB communication with FMG should mine the last FMG minutes for relevant decision items on which policy statements need to be derived. Perhaps Thursdays Ron and Lynn can review and add to FGB agendas.
  • FGB membership - quorum difficulties. Consider including broader perspectives with industry concerns. Good governance gives stakeholders confidence that the processes are conducted with balance to the community.
  • Precept for FGB on the composition and criteria of the FMG.

Disconnected at 8:40 AM.

Next Steps

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
  • FGB should put something together for elevator pitch and John puts it into his CTO report to the Board
  • Ron will schedule Woody, Grahame, Ron, and Austin/John to be on a call to evaluate policy assertions with conformity to ISO Datatypes
  • Ron develop precepts from the risks (conformity assessments, appeal processes, composition of FMG)
  • Lynn schedule weekly review with Ron to 'mine' FMG minutes for decisions needing underlying policy statements
  • Ron will address immediate need for "BAM-lite" with ArB.
  • Ron will follow up with John to establish a protocol for FGB chair representation in external stakeholder relationships wrt FHIR.


Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items


Back to FHIR_Governance_Board

© 2013 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.