This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "OO CR162-797 Patient Report Request"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{OO Open V2.9 Change Requests}}
+
{{OO Closed V2.9 Change Requests}}
 
Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page.
 
Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page.
  
Line 26: Line 26:
  
 
== Recommended Action Items ==
 
== Recommended Action Items ==
 +
 +
OO WGM - Sept 16, 2014 Tuesday q4
  
 
This needs a fair bit of work. Was discussed on the LRI call, and may no longer be urgent. Consult Hans/Ken regarding appropriate next steps
 
This needs a fair bit of work. Was discussed on the LRI call, and may no longer be urgent. Consult Hans/Ken regarding appropriate next steps
  
 
== Resolution ==
 
== Resolution ==
 +
*Oct 7, 2015 - Motion to not accept the proposal and advise to use the existing PRT value of Results Copies To, PRT-5 to identify the person, and as needed use PRT-6 to indicate whether that person is the patient, guardian, parent, etc.  To resolve indication to not provide certain information to a specific person, we suggest that for now we should use NTEs.  Riki Merrick, David Burgess
 +
** Against: 0; Abstain:3; In Favor: 7

Latest revision as of 18:25, 7 October 2015

Return to OO Change Requests page.

Submitted by: Ken McCaslin - on behalf of ONC Revision date: <<Revision Date>>
Submitted date: 16 June 2014 Change request ID: OO CR162
Standard/IG: Standard Artifact ID, Name: <<Artifact ID, Name>>

Issue

The proposal - Media:20140616OOWG-162HL7-797PatientExcessV4.docx

In 2013 in the US the changes were made to provide the patient with direct access to their reports. Need to have a mechanism to capture the patient, the patient's advocate, the patient's guardain, and/or the patient's parents request for the report and collect the destination of the report. ONC needs this for this rule making cycle, therefore it would be highly desirable to have it in proposed version 2.8.2 and updated in the LRI IG and LOI IGs.

Recommendation

Rationale

Discussion

Recommended Action Items

OO WGM - Sept 16, 2014 Tuesday q4

This needs a fair bit of work. Was discussed on the LRI call, and may no longer be urgent. Consult Hans/Ken regarding appropriate next steps

Resolution

  • Oct 7, 2015 - Motion to not accept the proposal and advise to use the existing PRT value of Results Copies To, PRT-5 to identify the person, and as needed use PRT-6 to indicate whether that person is the patient, guardian, parent, etc. To resolve indication to not provide certain information to a specific person, we suggest that for now we should use NTEs. Riki Merrick, David Burgess
    • Against: 0; Abstain:3; In Favor: 7