This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "20150707 US Realm SC Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| colspan="1" align="right"|'''Co-Chairs''' | | colspan="1" align="right"|'''Co-Chairs''' | ||
| − | | colspan="1" align="left"| Ed/Ken | + | | colspan="1" align="left"| Ed/Ken/John Q. |
| colspan="1" align="right"|'''Note taker(s)''' | | colspan="1" align="right"|'''Note taker(s)''' | ||
| colspan="1" align="left"| Anne | | colspan="1" align="left"| Anne | ||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
| || Calvin Beebe || ||Keith Boone|| || Hans Buitendijk | | || Calvin Beebe || ||Keith Boone|| || Hans Buitendijk | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ||Lorraine Constable || ||Johnathan Coleman|| ||Ed Hammond | + | | ||Lorraine Constable ||x||Johnathan Coleman||x||Ed Hammond |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ||Tony Julian|| ||Paul Knapp|| ||Austin Kreisler | + | |x||Tony Julian||x||Paul Knapp||Regrets||Austin Kreisler |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ||Ken McCaslin|| ||Brian Pech|| || John Quinn | + | | ||Ken McCaslin||x||Brian Pech|| || John Quinn |
| − | |||
| − | |||
|- | |- | ||
| + | | ||Pat Van Dyke|| ||Anne Wizauer|| | ||
| border="1" cellpadding="2" colspan="6" align="left"|'''Visitor / Name''' | | border="1" cellpadding="2" colspan="6" align="left"|'''Visitor / Name''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | || | + | | || John Roberts || <!-- name 2-->|| ||<!-- name 3--> |
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="6" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| | |colspan="6" style="background:#f0f0f0;"| | ||
| Line 69: | Line 68: | ||
Administrivia | Administrivia | ||
*Agenda review | *Agenda review | ||
| − | *Review notes from [[ | + | *Review notes from [[20150630_US_Realm_SC_Call]] |
*Action Items | *Action Items | ||
Discussion: | Discussion: | ||
| − | *Review of | + | *Review of current member list |
| − | + | *Review of updated M&C | |
| + | *Updated on Consolidated CDA extension issue | ||
| + | *Continued discussion re: scope of USR-SC activities - will it vote on dispositions/own content? (Question from FHIR) | ||
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
| + | *Agenda review: no additions or subtraction | ||
| + | *Brian Pech to confirm availability to serve | ||
| + | *Consolidated CDA extension: has been passed out of the GOC and has gone to EC; will go to membership for vote. | ||
| + | *USR-SC activities voting on dispositions/own content: will we have a registry for US Realm? We decided to wait for specific examples. The Board will have a retreat at the end of this month and one topic is addressing the issue of a US affiliate. Ed’s belief is that we’ll in some way have a US affiliate but the details are not clear yet. Would possibly be called HL7-US. Paul: bulk of work done within the WGs should not be perceived as country specific. However there are times that there are materials specific to jurisdictions that can be dealt with by a committee off on the side. Johnathan Coleman agrees. Paul agrees that the US Affiliate should exist but its work should be small compared to HL7 international. Brian suggests it could serve as a buffer when there are questions specific to US healthcare. Normally affiliates are populated with people from the affiliate and our group is populated differently. Paul suggests setting up the affiliate and have the affiliate business meeting at the WGM. | ||
| + | **Registry issue: Paul thinks there is big advantage for a single place to go. It would be really useful if profiles or artifacts could be tagged by realm; make it easy for people to get it, but don’t sent them to different places. There is a registry effort coming together, so it makes more sense to use that rather than think about creating a separate one. Ed agrees, states that there is still confusion over who is doing that registry. We should take this time to make requests for registry requirements. Concern that it may not be following HL7’s standard way of conducting projects. Ed agrees, asks where the push should come from? Paul states that FMG should participate in terms of requirements and the evaluation of things, but EST would manage the process of it. Ed will have a conversation with Chuck/Ken/John regarding this issue to make sure the work is being done within our processes. | ||
| + | **Next week: put FHIR issues as key part of the agenda. Also people needs to send regrets if they’re not showing up. | ||
Latest revision as of 20:28, 13 July 2015
back to US_Realm_Steering_Committee
back to US_Realm_Steering_Committee_Conference_Calls
| US Realm Steering Committee Call Agenda/Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# |
Date: 2015-07-07 Time: 1 PM Eastern | ||
| Co-Chairs | Ed/Ken/John Q. | Note taker(s) | Anne |
| Attendee / Name | ||||||||||
| Calvin Beebe | Keith Boone | Hans Buitendijk | ||||||||
| Lorraine Constable | x | Johnathan Coleman | x | Ed Hammond | ||||||
| x | Tony Julian | x | Paul Knapp | Regrets | Austin Kreisler | |||||
| Ken McCaslin | x | Brian Pech | John Quinn | |||||||
| Pat Van Dyke | Anne Wizauer | Visitor / Name | ||||||||
| John Roberts | ||||||||||
| no quorum definition | ||||||||||
Agenda
Administrivia
- Agenda review
- Review notes from 20150630_US_Realm_SC_Call
- Action Items
Discussion:
- Review of current member list
- Review of updated M&C
- Updated on Consolidated CDA extension issue
- Continued discussion re: scope of USR-SC activities - will it vote on dispositions/own content? (Question from FHIR)
Minutes
- Agenda review: no additions or subtraction
- Brian Pech to confirm availability to serve
- Consolidated CDA extension: has been passed out of the GOC and has gone to EC; will go to membership for vote.
- USR-SC activities voting on dispositions/own content: will we have a registry for US Realm? We decided to wait for specific examples. The Board will have a retreat at the end of this month and one topic is addressing the issue of a US affiliate. Ed’s belief is that we’ll in some way have a US affiliate but the details are not clear yet. Would possibly be called HL7-US. Paul: bulk of work done within the WGs should not be perceived as country specific. However there are times that there are materials specific to jurisdictions that can be dealt with by a committee off on the side. Johnathan Coleman agrees. Paul agrees that the US Affiliate should exist but its work should be small compared to HL7 international. Brian suggests it could serve as a buffer when there are questions specific to US healthcare. Normally affiliates are populated with people from the affiliate and our group is populated differently. Paul suggests setting up the affiliate and have the affiliate business meeting at the WGM.
- Registry issue: Paul thinks there is big advantage for a single place to go. It would be really useful if profiles or artifacts could be tagged by realm; make it easy for people to get it, but don’t sent them to different places. There is a registry effort coming together, so it makes more sense to use that rather than think about creating a separate one. Ed agrees, states that there is still confusion over who is doing that registry. We should take this time to make requests for registry requirements. Concern that it may not be following HL7’s standard way of conducting projects. Ed agrees, asks where the push should come from? Paul states that FMG should participate in terms of requirements and the evaluation of things, but EST would manage the process of it. Ed will have a conversation with Chuck/Ken/John regarding this issue to make sure the work is being done within our processes.
- Next week: put FHIR issues as key part of the agenda. Also people needs to send regrets if they’re not showing up.
Meeting Outcomes
| Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved
