This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here

20131113 US Realm TF Call

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
US Realm Task Force Call Agenda/Minutes

Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371#
https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/414809453

Date: 2013-11-13
Time: 5 pm Eastern Standard Time
Facilitator Austin Note taker(s) Lynn
Attendee Name


Calvin Beebe
x Woody Beeler
x Joe Bormel
Keith Boone
x Aziz Boxwala
Julie Crouse
x Lorraine Constable
John Feikema
x Marc Hadley
x Tony Julian
x Kensaku Kawamoto
x Paul Knapp
x Austin Kreisler,
x Lynn Laakso
x Ken McCaslin
x Chris Millet
John Quinn
Pat Van Dyke
no quorum definition

Agenda

  • Administrivia
    • Agenda review
    • Action Items
      • PSS on Standards 101 for ONC Contractors (Keith - after 11/13)
    • Review notes from 20131106_US_Realm_TF_Call
    • Expansion of task force membership - proposal to add Julie Crouse and Marc Hadley
  • Inventory of note:
  • Review of any outstanding issues
    • Source of truth for value sets

Minutes

Convened 5:05 PM

  • Administrivia
    • Agenda review - Keith not available for very long to review metadata project; approved by general consent
    • Action Items
      • PSS on Standards 101 for ONC Contractors (Keith - after 11/13)
    • Review notes from 20131106_US_Realm_TF_Call
    • Expansion of task force membership - proposal to add Julie Crouse and Marc Hadley; Joe describes their roles. Harmonization work on advancing quality measures and CDS has been illustrative with the prior project reviews. It would benefit them at the S&I work to participate. Austin notes that the task force is all US Realm not just CQI, CDS or even S&I Framework. KenK notes that Marc especially might be better off as an invited guest on topics in his area of work. Joe notes that Doug Fridsma undoubtedly envisioned a broader participation. Austin noted that we have a private internal listserv but may need an external facing one in addition. Perhaps a "TSCActivities" list.
  • Inventory of note:
    • 1042 on Clinical Quality Common Metadata (CQI sponsor), and 1045 Health Quality DAM (CDS sponsor)
      • Project Scope Statement for Harmonization of Health Quality Information Models at Project Insight # 1045 and TSC Tracker 2795 for CQI WG of DESD cosponsored by CDS and SDWG of SSD SD (US-Realm project)
        • Aziz describes QDM and vMR harmonization intent with the project. Woody comments that the rules live in one data space and the information lives in another. Aziz notes they will build mappings from the model to V3 or FHIR or both. Rules for using V3 are difficult for property of an act in an expression. Woody further points out there is an OWL representation of Clinical Statement.
        • Lorraine asks if the conceptual model will address behavior. She thought that ArB might be cosponsoring to the project to assist with the process. Aziz agrees that they would welcome it. Chris notes that they wrote several projects from the discussions in Cambridge. Metadata and behaviors were meant to be in different projects and this one is for information models throughout the stack. Behaviors are in a corresponding project. The behavioral one was scoped by this group's recommendation to confine it to the conceptual level.
        • Austin reviews platform independent information models and expresses desire to ensure that they have a checkpoint on their choice of an existing information model rather than build a new one.
        • Paul reviews the FMG perspective of the project. FHIR is concerned with concrete resources so at this stage they did not find it appropriate for their approval at this time. They ask that they come back at a later time with a request when the specific FHIR Resources or Profiles are identified. Lorraine adds that requesting a FHIR Resource has its own process in addition to project approval. Aziz responds that this project will change as they learn more. Austin suggests that we authorize the first phase at this point and then review a scope to the next phase when they have made progress on that exercise. They may spawn multiple projects on different platforms. Project scope updates can be made at any time but for balloting must follow the ballot timelines.
        • Scope changes made to constrain to the first phase of conceptual modeling. See http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/trackeritem/2795/11176/CQI_CDS_Health_Quality_Information_Models_Harmonization%2020131113.doc
      • Metadata project in Austin's review should be a brief discussion.
  • Review of any outstanding issues
    • Source of truth for value sets

Scheduling upcoming calls: meet the 20th, cancel the 27th.

Meeting Outcomes

Actions
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items

© 2013 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved