This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
20130723 arb minutes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ARB - Meeting (Date in Title)
Agenda
- Call to order
- Roll Call
- Approval of Agenda and Minutes
- Management
- Quickly Review to-do list
- Quickly Review/update Arb BAM task list
- Report from Architecture Project
- Governance
- Methodology
- Other business and planning
- Adjournment
Meeting Information
HL7 ArB Work Group Meeting Minutes Location: Telcon |
Date: 20130723 Time: 5:00pm U.S. Eastern | |||||
Facilitator | Constable, Lorraine | Note taker(s) | Stechishin, Andy | |||
Attendee | Name | Affiliation | ||||
R | Bond,Andy | NEHTA | ||||
× | Constable, Lorraine | Constable Consulting Inc. | ||||
. | Curry, Jane | Health Information Strategies | ||||
. | Dagnall, Bo | HP Enterprise Services | ||||
. | Hufnagel, Steve | U.S. Department of Defense, Military Health System | ||||
R | Julian, Tony | Mayo Clinic | ||||
× | Lynch, Cecil | Accenture | ||||
× | Milosevic, Zoran | Deontik Pty Ltd | ||||
R | Parker, Ron | CA Infoway | ||||
. | Quinn, John | Health Level Seven, Inc. | ||||
× | Stechishin,Andy | CANA Software and Service Ltd. | ||||
. | Guests | |||||
. | Kreisler, Austin | HL7 TSC Chair | ||||
. | Luthra, Anil | NCI | ||||
. | Pech, Brian | Kaiser Permanente | ||||
. | Shakir, Abdul Malik | City of Hope National Medical Center | ||||
. | Laakso, Lynn | HL7 | ||||
. | ||||||
. | Legend | |||||
X | Present | |||||
. | Absent | |||||
R | Regrets | |||||
Quorum Requirements Met (co-chair + 3): Yes |
Minutes
- Call to order
- Meeting called to order at 5:07 pm Eastern
- Approval of Agenda and Minutes
- Motion: Approve minutes as posted (Andy S/Zoran) - 2-0-1
- Management
- Quickly Review to-do list
- Tracker 2611 - Cecil had provided to the list a ZIP archive containing a stand-alone HTML representation of the contents of the Protege repository
- Andy S will investigate if the OWL/RDF format can be converted into MIF for publishing purposes.
- Zoran wanted to make sure that the Q/A of the glossary is complete and if the process to review/refine was laid out.
- There was discussion on the pros and cons of the various formats (PDF, HTML, Excel).
- Cecil will take an action item to produce a PDF format of the Glossary.
- Tracker 2611 - Cecil had provided to the list a ZIP archive containing a stand-alone HTML representation of the contents of the Protege repository
- Quickly Review/update Arb BAM task list
- Not done
- Report from Architecture Project
- Not done
- Quickly Review to-do list
- Governance
- Develop ballot review criteria
- Cecil believes that the clinical content may be incomplete. Lorraine wondered if this was pertinent as a review criteria for the ArB. Cecil and Lorraine discussed that RIM mapping was important, Cecil said that there should be traceability from the RIM to the FHIR resources and was an appropriate area for review for the ArB. Andy spoke about FHIR containing elements architectural elements (from a bottom kind of approach). Cecil suggested that RLUS and the relationship to FHIR should be examined
- Suggested Criteria: Review from a point of view of the Behavioural Framework in SAIf that the accountabilities and roles that are implied by the contracts in the interactions,
- Suggested Criteria: Reviewing with a look toward ensuring that the relationships between the resources is clear
- Zoran asked of it was the role of the ArB to monitor and suggest alignment to other architectural activities (specifically such as hData).
- Suggested Criteria: Lorraine thought it would be important to ensure that all the rules around expected behaviour are defined.
- Cecil believes that the clinical content may be incomplete. Lorraine wondered if this was pertinent as a review criteria for the ArB. Cecil and Lorraine discussed that RIM mapping was important, Cecil said that there should be traceability from the RIM to the FHIR resources and was an appropriate area for review for the ArB. Andy spoke about FHIR containing elements architectural elements (from a bottom kind of approach). Cecil suggested that RLUS and the relationship to FHIR should be examined
- Develop ballot review criteria
- Methodology
- No items
- Other business and planning
- 7/30 SAIF tutorial Development
- 8/6 Develop Ballot criteria task 2623
- 8/13 walkthrough of FHIR ballot task 2623
- 8/20 Invite FHIR - FDG, FMG to review criteria task 2623
- 8/27 Start WGM planning
- 9/3 Individuals review due - send to tony to consolidate. task 2623
- 9/10 joint review of FHIR ballot task 2623
- 9/17 Finalize WGM planning
- 9/24 WGM
- 10/1 FHIR ballot Recon call task 2623
- 10/8 BAM methodology requirements
- 10/15 Equip team to finish the BAM
- Adjournment
- 6:04 pm Eastern