Difference between revisions of "October 15, 2013 Security WG Conference Call"
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* Y -[mailto:dproud-madruga@drc.com Diana Proud-Madruga] | * Y -[mailto:dproud-madruga@drc.com Diana Proud-Madruga] | ||
* [mailto:ioana.singureanu@gmail.com Ioana Singureanu] | * [mailto:ioana.singureanu@gmail.com Ioana Singureanu] | ||
− | * [mailto:david.staggs@jerichosystems.com] | + | * [mailto:david.staggs@jerichosystems.com David Staggs] |
* [mailto:richard.thoreson@samhsa.hhs.gov Richard Thoreson] CBCC Co-chair | * [mailto:richard.thoreson@samhsa.hhs.gov Richard Thoreson] CBCC Co-chair | ||
* [mailto:weida@apelon.com Tony Weida] | * [mailto:weida@apelon.com Tony Weida] | ||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
− | ''' Ballot Reconciliation''' HCS | + | ''' Ballot Reconciliation''' HCS [Kathleen to add link to latest ballet reconciliation sheet] |
+ | Lines 13-31 | ||
* comment 10,11 - more verbiage added | * comment 10,11 - more verbiage added | ||
** Mike expressed concern on 'Note to Readers' pointing to non-Normative information | ** Mike expressed concern on 'Note to Readers' pointing to non-Normative information | ||
Line 57: | Line 58: | ||
* comment 19 | * comment 19 | ||
* comment 20 break glass; remark is out of scope. HCS is not about defining policy or defining mechanisms to implement policy but provides vocabulary in supporting policy | * comment 20 break glass; remark is out of scope. HCS is not about defining policy or defining mechanisms to implement policy but provides vocabulary in supporting policy | ||
+ | * comment 21 accepted, comment withdrawn | ||
+ | * line 31 - Mike is not opposed to new work regarding new rules, bring these in and make them normative--as this is a larger change | ||
+ | |||
+ | Motion to accept ballot resolutions comments 13-31 (Alan Hobbs, Lisa, John M) | ||
+ | No Discussion | ||
+ | Vote: objections: none; abstentions: none; approval: 7 - motion passes | ||
+ | |||
+ | Kathleen will send reminder to commenters to withdraw negative votes on HCS. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Meeting adjourned at 3:04PM PST | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:Suzannegw|Suzannegw]] 22:04, 15 October 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:04, 15 October 2013
Security Working Group Meeting
Attendees
- Johnathan Coleman
- Y -Kathleen Connor
- Y - Mike Davis Security Co-chair
- Y - Duane DeCouteau
- Y -Brian Handspicker
- Reed Gelzer
- Y -Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-chair
- Y -Muhammed Jafari
- Don Jorgenson
- John Moehrke Security Co-chair
- Y -Diana Proud-Madruga
- Ioana Singureanu
- David Staggs
- Richard Thoreson CBCC Co-chair
- Tony Weida
- Trish Williams
- Harry Rhodes
==SPECIAL BALLOT VOTE MEETING TO
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
- (15 min) Ballot Reconciliation HCS - review of latest
- (15 min) Agenda Item
- (10 min) Other Business
Meeting Minutes
Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
Ballot Reconciliation DS4P review
Ioana has made a small change to the disposition comment#4 (row7) - an "affirmative comment" - and updates the spreadsheet on the Security WG GForge release page: http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/security/frs/?action=FrsReleaseBrowse&frs_package_id=229
There are a few items that require review/vote from Security WG:
- Items Number 15, 16 (rows 18,19) - updated from "Clarification required" to "Persuasive" - these items require a discussion and vote. If I did not capture the intent of the submitter, please feel free to augment the disposition comment.
- Items Numbers 7, 23 (rows 10, 26) - updated from "Not persuasive" to "Persuasive with mod" - these need a discussion and a vote. If I did not capture the intent of the submitter, please feel free to augment the disposition comment.
- Item Number 103 (row 107) - was discussed by Johnathan and I recorded the agreed comment; it requires a vote. No discussion should be needed to close this item.
Ballot Reconciliation HCS [Kathleen to add link to latest ballet reconciliation sheet]
Lines 13-31
- comment 10,11 - more verbiage added
- Mike expressed concern on 'Note to Readers' pointing to non-Normative information
- comment 12, 13, 14
- comment 17 / John Snyder (write up/read down - wording change)
- comment 19
- comment 20 break glass; remark is out of scope. HCS is not about defining policy or defining mechanisms to implement policy but provides vocabulary in supporting policy
- comment 21 accepted, comment withdrawn
- line 31 - Mike is not opposed to new work regarding new rules, bring these in and make them normative--as this is a larger change
Motion to accept ballot resolutions comments 13-31 (Alan Hobbs, Lisa, John M) No Discussion Vote: objections: none; abstentions: none; approval: 7 - motion passes
Kathleen will send reminder to commenters to withdraw negative votes on HCS.
Meeting adjourned at 3:04PM PST
--Suzannegw 22:04, 15 October 2013 (UTC)