This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

October 15, 2013 Security WG Conference Call

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Security Working Group Meeting

Back to Security Main Page

Attendees

==SPECIAL BALLOT VOTE MEETING TO

Back to Security Main Page

Agenda

  1. (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
  2. (15 min) Ballot Reconciliation HCS - review of latest
  3. (15 min) Agenda Item
  1. (10 min) Other Business

Meeting Minutes

Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda

Ballot Reconciliation DS4P review

from e-mail string:

Ioana has made a small change to the disposition comment#4 (row7) - an "affirmative comment" - and updates the spreadsheet on the Security WG GForge release page: http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/security/frs/?action=FrsReleaseBrowse&frs_package_id=229

There are a few items that require review/vote from Security WG:

  • Items Number 15, 16 (rows 18,19) - updated from "Clarification required" to "Persuasive" - these items require a discussion and vote. If I did not capture the intent of the submitter, please feel free to augment the disposition comment.
  • Items Numbers 7, 23 (rows 10, 26) - updated from "Not persuasive" to "Persuasive with mod" - these need a discussion and a vote. If I did not capture the intent of the submitter, please feel free to augment the disposition comment.
  • Item Number 103 (row 107) - was discussed by Johnathan and I recorded the agreed comment; it requires a vote. No discussion should be needed to close this item.


Ballot Reconciliation HCS Ballot Reconciliation Spreadsheet

Lines 13-31

  • comment 10,11 - more verbiage added
    • Mike expressed concern on 'Note to Readers' pointing to non-Normative information
  • comment 12, 13, 14
  • comment 17 / John Snyder (write up/read down - wording change)
  • comment 19
  • comment 20 break glass; remark is out of scope. HCS is not about defining policy or defining mechanisms to implement policy but provides vocabulary in supporting policy. See Security Work Group Emergency Access paper by Mike Davis and John Moehrke.
  • comment 21 accepted, comment withdrawn
  • line 31 - Mike is not opposed to new work regarding new rules, bring these in and make them normative--as this is a larger change

Motion to accept ballot resolutions comments 13-31 (Alan Hobbs, Lisa, John M) No Discussion Vote: objections: none; abstentions: none; approval: 7 - motion passes

Kathleen will send reminder to commenters to withdraw negative votes on HCS.

Meeting adjourned at 3:04PM PST

--Suzannegw 22:04, 15 October 2013 (UTC)