This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "October 15, 2013 Security WG Conference Call"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
* [mailto:jc@securityrs.com Johnathan Coleman]
 
* [mailto:jc@securityrs.com Johnathan Coleman]
* [mailto:Kathleen_Connor@comcast.net Kathleen Connor]
+
* Y -[mailto:Kathleen_Connor@comcast.net Kathleen Connor]
* [mailto:mike.davis@va.gov Mike Davis] Security Co-chair
+
* Y - [mailto:mike.davis@va.gov Mike Davis] Security Co-chair
* [mailto:bd@handspiker Brian Handspicker]
+
* Y - [mailto:duane.decouteau@gmail.com Duane DeCouteau]
 +
* Y -[mailto:bd@handspiker Brian Handspicker]
 
* [mailto:r.gelzer@myfairpoint.net Reed Gelzer]
 
* [mailto:r.gelzer@myfairpoint.net Reed Gelzer]
* [mailto:sgonzales-webb@drc.com Suzanne Gonzales-Webb] CBCC Co-chair
+
* Y -[mailto:sgonzales-webb@drc.com Suzanne Gonzales-Webb] CBCC Co-chair
 
+
* Y -[mailto:mjafari@edmondsci.com Muhammed Jafari]
 
* [mailto:djorgenson@inpriva.com Don Jorgenson]
 
* [mailto:djorgenson@inpriva.com Don Jorgenson]
 
* [mailto:john.moehrke@med.ge.com John Moehrke] Security Co-chair
 
* [mailto:john.moehrke@med.ge.com John Moehrke] Security Co-chair
* [mailto:dproud-madruga@drc.com Diana Proud-Madruga]
+
* Y -[mailto:dproud-madruga@drc.com Diana Proud-Madruga]
 
* [mailto:ioana.singureanu@gmail.com Ioana Singureanu]
 
* [mailto:ioana.singureanu@gmail.com Ioana Singureanu]
 +
* [mailto:david.staggs@jerichosystems.com David Staggs]
 
* [mailto:richard.thoreson@samhsa.hhs.gov Richard Thoreson] CBCC Co-chair
 
* [mailto:richard.thoreson@samhsa.hhs.gov Richard Thoreson] CBCC Co-chair
 
* [mailto:weida@apelon.com Tony Weida]
 
* [mailto:weida@apelon.com Tony Weida]
Line 38: Line 40:
 
'''Ballot Reconciliation''' DS4P review
 
'''Ballot Reconciliation''' DS4P review
  
a small change to the disposition comment#4 (row7) - an "affirmative comment" - and updates the spreadsheet on the Security WG GForge release page: http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/security/frs/?action=FrsReleaseBrowse&frs_package_id=229
+
from e-mail string:
 +
 
 +
Ioana has made a small change to the disposition comment#4 (row7) - an "affirmative comment" - and updates the spreadsheet on the Security WG GForge release page: http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/security/frs/?action=FrsReleaseBrowse&frs_package_id=229
  
 
There are a few items that require review/vote from Security WG:
 
There are a few items that require review/vote from Security WG:
  
Items Number 15, 16 (rows 18,19) - updated from "Clarification required" to "Persuasive" - these items require a discussion and vote. If I did not capture the intent of the submitter, please feel free to augment the disposition comment.
+
* Items Number 15, 16 (rows 18,19) - updated from "Clarification required" to "Persuasive" - these items require a discussion and vote. If I did not capture the intent of the submitter, please feel free to augment the disposition comment.
Items Numbers 7, 23 (rows 10, 26) - updated from "Not persuasive" to "Persuasive with mod" - these need a discussion and a vote.  If I did not capture the intent of the submitter, please feel free to augment the disposition comment.
+
* Items Numbers 7, 23 (rows 10, 26) - updated from "Not persuasive" to "Persuasive with mod" - these need a discussion and a vote.  If I did not capture the intent of the submitter, please feel free to augment the disposition comment.
Item Number 103 (row  107) - was discussed by Johnathan and I recorded the agreed comment; it requires a vote. No discussion should be needed to close this item.
+
* Item Number 103 (row  107) - was discussed by Johnathan and I recorded the agreed comment; it requires a vote. No discussion should be needed to close this item.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
''' Ballot Reconciliation''' [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7637/11082/Amalgamate_PRIV_SEC_CLASS_SYS_R1_N1_2013SEP.xls HCS Ballot Reconciliation Spreadsheet]
 +
 
 +
Lines 13-31
 +
* comment 10,11 - more verbiage added
 +
** Mike expressed concern on 'Note to Readers' pointing to non-Normative information
 +
* comment 12, 13, 14
 +
* comment 17 / John Snyder (write up/read down - wording change)
 +
* comment 19
 +
* comment 20 break glass; remark is out of scope.  HCS is not about defining policy or defining mechanisms to implement policy but provides vocabulary in supporting policy.  See [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7638/11083/HL7%20Emergency%20Access.doc Security Work Group Emergency Access paper] by Mike Davis and John Moehrke.
 +
* comment 21 accepted, comment withdrawn
 +
* line 31 - Mike is not opposed to new work regarding new rules, bring these in and make them normative--as this is a larger change
 +
 
 +
Motion to accept ballot resolutions comments 13-31 (Alan Hobbs, Lisa, John M)
 +
No Discussion
 +
Vote: objections: none; abstentions: none; approval: 7 - motion passes
 +
 
 +
Kathleen will send reminder to commenters to withdraw negative votes on HCS.
  
 +
Meeting adjourned at 3:04PM PST
  
''' Ballot Reconciliation''' HCS
+
--[[User:Suzannegw|Suzannegw]] 22:04, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:15, 16 October 2013

Security Working Group Meeting

Back to Security Main Page

Attendees

==SPECIAL BALLOT VOTE MEETING TO

Back to Security Main Page

Agenda

  1. (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
  2. (15 min) Ballot Reconciliation HCS - review of latest
  3. (15 min) Agenda Item
  1. (10 min) Other Business

Meeting Minutes

Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda

Ballot Reconciliation DS4P review

from e-mail string:

Ioana has made a small change to the disposition comment#4 (row7) - an "affirmative comment" - and updates the spreadsheet on the Security WG GForge release page: http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/security/frs/?action=FrsReleaseBrowse&frs_package_id=229

There are a few items that require review/vote from Security WG:

  • Items Number 15, 16 (rows 18,19) - updated from "Clarification required" to "Persuasive" - these items require a discussion and vote. If I did not capture the intent of the submitter, please feel free to augment the disposition comment.
  • Items Numbers 7, 23 (rows 10, 26) - updated from "Not persuasive" to "Persuasive with mod" - these need a discussion and a vote. If I did not capture the intent of the submitter, please feel free to augment the disposition comment.
  • Item Number 103 (row 107) - was discussed by Johnathan and I recorded the agreed comment; it requires a vote. No discussion should be needed to close this item.


Ballot Reconciliation HCS Ballot Reconciliation Spreadsheet

Lines 13-31

  • comment 10,11 - more verbiage added
    • Mike expressed concern on 'Note to Readers' pointing to non-Normative information
  • comment 12, 13, 14
  • comment 17 / John Snyder (write up/read down - wording change)
  • comment 19
  • comment 20 break glass; remark is out of scope. HCS is not about defining policy or defining mechanisms to implement policy but provides vocabulary in supporting policy. See Security Work Group Emergency Access paper by Mike Davis and John Moehrke.
  • comment 21 accepted, comment withdrawn
  • line 31 - Mike is not opposed to new work regarding new rules, bring these in and make them normative--as this is a larger change

Motion to accept ballot resolutions comments 13-31 (Alan Hobbs, Lisa, John M) No Discussion Vote: objections: none; abstentions: none; approval: 7 - motion passes

Kathleen will send reminder to commenters to withdraw negative votes on HCS.

Meeting adjourned at 3:04PM PST

--Suzannegw 22:04, 15 October 2013 (UTC)