This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "October 15, 2013 Security WG Conference Call"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 18: Line 18:
 
* Y -[mailto:dproud-madruga@drc.com Diana Proud-Madruga]
 
* Y -[mailto:dproud-madruga@drc.com Diana Proud-Madruga]
 
* [mailto:ioana.singureanu@gmail.com Ioana Singureanu]
 
* [mailto:ioana.singureanu@gmail.com Ioana Singureanu]
* [mailto:david.staggs@jerichosystems.com]
+
* [mailto:david.staggs@jerichosystems.com David Staggs]
 
* [mailto:richard.thoreson@samhsa.hhs.gov Richard Thoreson] CBCC Co-chair
 
* [mailto:richard.thoreson@samhsa.hhs.gov Richard Thoreson] CBCC Co-chair
 
* [mailto:weida@apelon.com Tony Weida]
 
* [mailto:weida@apelon.com Tony Weida]
Line 49: Line 49:
  
  
''' Ballot Reconciliation''' HCS
+
''' Ballot Reconciliation''' HCS [Kathleen to add link to latest ballet reconciliation sheet]
  
 +
Lines 13-31
 
* comment 10,11 - more verbiage added
 
* comment 10,11 - more verbiage added
 
** Mike expressed concern on 'Note to Readers' pointing to non-Normative information
 
** Mike expressed concern on 'Note to Readers' pointing to non-Normative information
Line 57: Line 58:
 
* comment 19
 
* comment 19
 
* comment 20 break glass; remark is out of scope.  HCS is not about defining policy or defining mechanisms to implement policy but provides vocabulary in supporting policy
 
* comment 20 break glass; remark is out of scope.  HCS is not about defining policy or defining mechanisms to implement policy but provides vocabulary in supporting policy
 +
* comment 21 accepted, comment withdrawn
 +
* line 31 - Mike is not opposed to new work regarding new rules, bring these in and make them normative--as this is a larger change
 +
 +
Motion to accept ballot resolutions comments 13-31 (Alan Hobbs, Lisa, John M)
 +
No Discussion
 +
Vote: objections: none; abstentions: none; approval: 7 - motion passes
 +
 +
Kathleen will send reminder to commenters to withdraw negative votes on HCS.
 +
 +
Meeting adjourned at 3:04PM PST
 +
 +
--[[User:Suzannegw|Suzannegw]] 22:04, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:04, 15 October 2013

Security Working Group Meeting

Back to Security Main Page

Attendees

==SPECIAL BALLOT VOTE MEETING TO

Back to Security Main Page

Agenda

  1. (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
  2. (15 min) Ballot Reconciliation HCS - review of latest
  3. (15 min) Agenda Item
  1. (10 min) Other Business

Meeting Minutes

Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda

Ballot Reconciliation DS4P review

Ioana has made a small change to the disposition comment#4 (row7) - an "affirmative comment" - and updates the spreadsheet on the Security WG GForge release page: http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/security/frs/?action=FrsReleaseBrowse&frs_package_id=229

There are a few items that require review/vote from Security WG:

  • Items Number 15, 16 (rows 18,19) - updated from "Clarification required" to "Persuasive" - these items require a discussion and vote. If I did not capture the intent of the submitter, please feel free to augment the disposition comment.
  • Items Numbers 7, 23 (rows 10, 26) - updated from "Not persuasive" to "Persuasive with mod" - these need a discussion and a vote. If I did not capture the intent of the submitter, please feel free to augment the disposition comment.
  • Item Number 103 (row 107) - was discussed by Johnathan and I recorded the agreed comment; it requires a vote. No discussion should be needed to close this item.


Ballot Reconciliation HCS [Kathleen to add link to latest ballet reconciliation sheet]

Lines 13-31

  • comment 10,11 - more verbiage added
    • Mike expressed concern on 'Note to Readers' pointing to non-Normative information
  • comment 12, 13, 14
  • comment 17 / John Snyder (write up/read down - wording change)
  • comment 19
  • comment 20 break glass; remark is out of scope. HCS is not about defining policy or defining mechanisms to implement policy but provides vocabulary in supporting policy
  • comment 21 accepted, comment withdrawn
  • line 31 - Mike is not opposed to new work regarding new rules, bring these in and make them normative--as this is a larger change

Motion to accept ballot resolutions comments 13-31 (Alan Hobbs, Lisa, John M) No Discussion Vote: objections: none; abstentions: none; approval: 7 - motion passes

Kathleen will send reminder to commenters to withdraw negative votes on HCS.

Meeting adjourned at 3:04PM PST

--Suzannegw 22:04, 15 October 2013 (UTC)