OO CRLRI-009 - LRI-60 and LRI-61

Return to OO Change Requests page.

Submitted by: Eric Haas	Revision date: Jan 21 2014
Submitted date: Jan 21 2014	Change request ID: OO CRLRI-009
Standard/IG: Implementation Guide	Artifact ID, Name: LRI-60 and LRI-61

Issue

Technical issues with how the conformance statements are written.

1)LRI-60 is a compound conformance statement and would be clearer if separated.

2)There can be multiple OBRs and unclear to which the Statements are referring.

• LRI-60: "If one or more SPM segments are present for the same OBR, then the earliest SPM-17.1 (Range Start Date/Time) SHALL be

equal to or before OBR-7 (Observation Date/Time) and OBR-7 (Observation Date/Time) SHALL be equal to or before the latest SPM- 17.2 (Range End Date/Time)."

• LRI-61: "If one or more SPM segments are present for the same OBR and if OBR-8 (Observation End Date/Time) is present, OBR-8

(Observation End Date/Time) SHALL be equal to or before the latest SPM-17.2 (Range End Date/Time)"

in the PH component rewrote them to correct these issues:

• ELR-75: The earliest SPM-17.1 (Range Start Date/Time) value SHALL be equal to or before OBR-7 (Observation Date/Time) value within the same

ORDER_OBSERVATION Group.

• ELR-76: If present, the latest SPM-17.2 (Range End Date/Time) value SHALL be equal to or after OBR-7 (Observation Date/Time) value within the

same Order_Observation Group.

• ELR-30: If present, the latest SPM-17.2 (Range End Date/Time) value SHALL be equal to or after OBR-8 (Observation End Date/Time) value within the

same ORDER_OBSERVATION Group

But this created conflicting Conformance statement between the base profile and the PH profile.

Recommendation

Reommend replacing LRI-60 and LRI-61 with ELR-75, ELR-76 and ELR-30. (renaming them appropriately)

Discuss whether these CS are necessary in light of their absence in LOI.

Rationale

Simplify and Clarify Conformance statements