This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
OO CRLRI-009 - LRI-60 and LRI-61
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Return to OO Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: Eric Haas | Revision date: Jan 21 2014 |
| Submitted date: Jan 21 2014 | Change request ID: OO CRLRI-009 |
| Standard/IG: Implementation Guide | Artifact ID, Name: LRI-60 and LRI-61 |
Issue
Technical issues with how the conformance statements are written.
1)LRI-60 is a compound conformance statement and would be clearer if separated.
2)There can be multiple OBRs and unclear to which the Statements are referring.
- LRI-60: "If one or more SPM segments are present for the same OBR, then the earliest SPM-17.1 (Range Start Date/Time) SHALL be equal to or before OBR-7 (Observation Date/Time) and OBR-7 (Observation Date/Time) SHALL be equal to or before the latest SPM-17.2 (Range End Date/Time)."
- LRI-61: "If one or more SPM segments are present for the same OBR and if OBR-8 (Observation End Date/Time) is present, OBR-8 (Observation End Date/Time) SHALL be equal to or before the latest SPM-17.2 (Range End Date/Time)"
in the PH component rewrote them to correct these issues:
- ELR-75: The earliest SPM-17.1 (Range Start Date/Time) value SHALL be equal to or before OBR-7 (Observation Date/Time) value within the same ORDER_OBSERVATION Group.
- ELR-76: If present, the latest SPM-17.2 (Range End Date/Time) value SHALL be equal to or after OBR-7 (Observation Date/Time) value within the same Order_Observation Group.
- ELR-30: If present, the latest SPM-17.2 (Range End Date/Time) value SHALL be equal to or after OBR-8 (Observation End Date/Time) value within the same ORDER_OBSERVATION Group
But this created conflicting Conformance statement between the base profile and the PH profile.
Recommendation
Reommend replacing LRI-60 and LRI-61 with ELR-75, ELR-76 and ELR-30. (renaming them appropriately)
Discuss whether these CS are necessary in light of their absence in LOI.
Rationale
Simplify and Clarify Conformance statements
