Difference between revisions of "OO CRLRI-009 - LRI-60 and LRI-61"
(Created page with "Category:OO Open LRI IG Change Requests Return to OO Change Requests page. {|width=100% cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2 border=1 || '''Submitte...") |
(→Issue) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
'''Technical issues with how the conformance statements are written.''' | '''Technical issues with how the conformance statements are written.''' | ||
| − | LRI-60 is a compound conformance statement and would be clearer if separated. | + | 1)LRI-60 is a compound conformance statement and would be clearer if separated. |
| − | Statements are referring. | + | 2)There can be multiple OBRs and unclear to which the Statements are referring. |
*LRI-60: "If one or more SPM segments are present for the same OBR, then the earliest SPM-17.1 (Range Start Date/Time) SHALL be | *LRI-60: "If one or more SPM segments are present for the same OBR, then the earliest SPM-17.1 (Range Start Date/Time) SHALL be | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
But this created conflicting Conformance statement between the base profile and the PH profile. | But this created conflicting Conformance statement between the base profile and the PH profile. | ||
| − | + | ||
== Recommendation == | == Recommendation == | ||
Revision as of 21:36, 1 July 2014
Return to OO Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: Eric Haas | Revision date: Jan 21 2014 |
| Submitted date: Jan 21 2014 | Change request ID: OO CRLRI-009 |
| Standard/IG: Implementation Guide | Artifact ID, Name: LRI-60 and LRI-61 |
Issue
Technical issues with how the conformance statements are written.
1)LRI-60 is a compound conformance statement and would be clearer if separated. 2)There can be multiple OBRs and unclear to which the Statements are referring.
- LRI-60: "If one or more SPM segments are present for the same OBR, then the earliest SPM-17.1 (Range Start Date/Time) SHALL be
equal to or before OBR-7 (Observation Date/Time) and OBR-7 (Observation Date/Time) SHALL be equal to or before the latest SPM- 17.2 (Range End Date/Time)."
- LRI-61: "If one or more SPM segments are present for the same OBR and if OBR-8 (Observation End Date/Time) is present, OBR-8
(Observation End Date/Time) SHALL be equal to or before the latest SPM-17.2 (Range End Date/Time)"
in the PH component rewrote them to correct these issues:
- ELR-75: The earliest SPM-17.1 (Range Start Date/Time) value SHALL be equal to or before OBR-7 (Observation Date/Time) value within the same
ORDER_OBSERVATION Group.
- ELR-76: If present, the latest SPM-17.2 (Range End Date/Time) value SHALL be equal to or after OBR-7 (Observation Date/Time) value within the
same Order_Observation Group.
- ELR-30: If present, the latest SPM-17.2 (Range End Date/Time) value SHALL be equal to or after OBR-8 (Observation End Date/Time) value within the
same ORDER_OBSERVATION Group
But this created conflicting Conformance statement between the base profile and the PH profile.
Recommendation
Reommend replacing LRI-60 and LRI-61 with ELR-75, ELR-76 and ELR-30. (renaming them appropriately)
Discuss whether these CS are necessary in light of their absence in LOI.
Rationale
Simplify and Clarify Conformance statements
