This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20080926"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
=M&M Conference Call Noon Eastern Time (Date above)=
+
[[Category:2008 MnM Minutes]]
−
==Logistics==
 
−
Join GoToMeeting at
 
−
:https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/846611869
 
−
:GoToMeeting ID: 846-611-869
 
−
 
 
−
Conference Call:
 
−
:Noon Eastern Time
 
−
Use HL7 Conference Call service
 
−
:Phone Number: 770-657-9270
 
−
:Participant Passcode: 459876#
 
−
 
 
−
(for more detail refer to [[MnM_Schedule| meeting schedule]]
 
−
 
 
 
==Agenda==
 
==Agenda==
 
*'''Approval of minutes '''
 
*'''Approval of minutes '''
Line 19: Line 6:
 
*Review '''[http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/frs/?group_id=27&release_id=383 Project Scope Statement for RIM Balloting]''' (Beeler, Deadline is 9/28)
 
*Review '''[http://hl7projects.hl7.nscee.edu/frs/?group_id=27&release_id=383 Project Scope Statement for RIM Balloting]''' (Beeler, Deadline is 9/28)
 
* Continue '''Versioning Discussion''' from Vancouver
 
* Continue '''Versioning Discussion''' from Vancouver
 +
**[[20080918 Informal Versioning Discussion]]
 
* '''Verify''' [[MnM_Schedule|Conference call & Harmonization schedule ]]
 
* '''Verify''' [[MnM_Schedule|Conference call & Harmonization schedule ]]
 
*Other TBD
 
*Other TBD
 +
 +
==Attendees==
 +
Shakir, McKenzie, Beeler, Stechishin, Seppala, Nelson, Kreisler, Spronk, Neat, Parker, Coller
 +
 +
==Minutes==
 +
 +
===Approval of Minutes===
 +
* September 5 minutes
 +
** Beeler/Stechishin - unanimous
 +
* Vancouver WGM minutes
 +
** To be approved at a future date
 +
 +
===Approval of Project Scope Statement for RIM Balloting===
 +
* Beeler/Nelson  unanimous
 +
 +
===Verify Conference call & Harmonization schedule===
 +
* The committee reviewed the upcoming MnM schedule. No objections or concerns were raised.
 +
 +
===Questions from AMS re: submitting harmonization proposals===
 +
* For questions about submitting vocabulary submissions, he was directed to the "Vocabulary Maintenance Language (Value Set Revision)" on the wiki.
 +
* He asked if it is possible to have a different value set for a qualifier than for a base code. -> Currently this is only supported in MIF.
 +
* He asked how to restrict ActStatus? ->  Propose a new valueSet.
 +
 +
===Versioning===
 +
* Lloyd
 +
** Versioning artifact ids does not buy us a lot.
 +
** Versioning of packages is more useful
 +
** Rather than having artifact versions for interactions, say I'm using NE2006.
 +
 +
* Woody
 +
** This tends to leave out the pre-adopters
 +
 +
* Lloyd
 +
** This is addressed by having ballot editions
 +
 +
* Woody
 +
** Conformance to a given edition or ballot is sufficient.
 +
 +
* Lloyd
 +
** If we identify the edition or ballot, separately identifying the versions of the artifacts is redundant.  The way that we are currently specifying the version on artifacts is not sufficient.
 +
 +
* Woody
 +
** How do we know if something has changed between editions or ballots?
 +
** Do we want to keep assigning version ids to artifacts (this has been useful for CMETs)
 +
 +
* Lloyd
 +
** We could use ARTIFACT_ID[DATE] to reference specific artifacts
 +
 +
* Woody
 +
** Tooling would have to be changed to support this
 +
 +
* Gregg
 +
** Aren't CMETs always bound by name (not version)?
 +
 +
* Lloyd
 +
** Yes
 +
 +
* Gregg
 +
** How do we reference a specific version of a CMET?
 +
 +
* Lloyd
 +
** Versions of the same CMET should be compatible
 +
 +
* Woody
 +
** We need to draft a proposed solution that addresses the multiple constituents.
 +
 +
'''Action:''' Lloyd will lead the effort to draft a proposal.  Woody will participate.  Lloyd will solicate other participation.
 +
  
 
[[MnM_Minutes | Return to M&M Minutes List]]
 
[[MnM_Minutes | Return to M&M Minutes List]]

Latest revision as of 01:39, 21 May 2010

Agenda

Attendees

Shakir, McKenzie, Beeler, Stechishin, Seppala, Nelson, Kreisler, Spronk, Neat, Parker, Coller

Minutes

Approval of Minutes

  • September 5 minutes
    • Beeler/Stechishin - unanimous
  • Vancouver WGM minutes
    • To be approved at a future date

Approval of Project Scope Statement for RIM Balloting

  • Beeler/Nelson unanimous

Verify Conference call & Harmonization schedule

  • The committee reviewed the upcoming MnM schedule. No objections or concerns were raised.

Questions from AMS re: submitting harmonization proposals

  • For questions about submitting vocabulary submissions, he was directed to the "Vocabulary Maintenance Language (Value Set Revision)" on the wiki.
  • He asked if it is possible to have a different value set for a qualifier than for a base code. -> Currently this is only supported in MIF.
  • He asked how to restrict ActStatus? -> Propose a new valueSet.

Versioning

  • Lloyd
    • Versioning artifact ids does not buy us a lot.
    • Versioning of packages is more useful
    • Rather than having artifact versions for interactions, say I'm using NE2006.
  • Woody
    • This tends to leave out the pre-adopters
  • Lloyd
    • This is addressed by having ballot editions
  • Woody
    • Conformance to a given edition or ballot is sufficient.
  • Lloyd
    • If we identify the edition or ballot, separately identifying the versions of the artifacts is redundant. The way that we are currently specifying the version on artifacts is not sufficient.
  • Woody
    • How do we know if something has changed between editions or ballots?
    • Do we want to keep assigning version ids to artifacts (this has been useful for CMETs)
  • Lloyd
    • We could use ARTIFACT_ID[DATE] to reference specific artifacts
  • Woody
    • Tooling would have to be changed to support this
  • Gregg
    • Aren't CMETs always bound by name (not version)?
  • Lloyd
    • Yes
  • Gregg
    • How do we reference a specific version of a CMET?
  • Lloyd
    • Versions of the same CMET should be compatible
  • Woody
    • We need to draft a proposed solution that addresses the multiple constituents.

Action: Lloyd will lead the effort to draft a proposal. Woody will participate. Lloyd will solicate other participation.


Return to M&M Minutes List

Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=MnM_Minutes_CC_20080926&oldid=37013"