This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "Extend CDA R3 Header with supprt for GP/PCP"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: {{CDA R3 Open Proposals}} Return to SDTC page; Return to CDA R3 Formal Proposals page. {|width=100% cellspacing=0 cellpa...)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{CDA R3 Open Proposals}}
+
{{CDA R3 Approved Proposals}}
  
 
Return to [[Structured Documents TC|SDTC]] page; Return to [[:category:CDA R3 Formal Proposals|CDA R3 Formal Proposals]] page.
 
Return to [[Structured Documents TC|SDTC]] page; Return to [[:category:CDA R3 Formal Proposals|CDA R3 Formal Proposals]] page.
Line 31: Line 31:
  
 
== Resolution ==
 
== Resolution ==
(Resolution is to be recorded here and in the referenced minutes, which are the authoritative source of resolution).
+
March 23, 2010: Agree with the need to represent patient's PCP in header. Details of representation to be worked out. Opposed: 0; Abstain: 0: In favor: 6.

Latest revision as of 20:55, 23 March 2010


Return to SDTC page; Return to CDA R3 Formal Proposals page.

Submitted by: Rene Spronk Revision date: 2009-07-15
Submitted date: 2009-07-15 Change request ID: <<Change Request ID>>

Issue

Need a header for patient's registered/normal General Practitioner (PCP, lots of names all round the world).

Recommendation

  • The GP/PCP is modelled, in the PA D-MIM, as a careProvision associated with the Person playing the role of patient. IN CDA R3, either:
    1. Use a R_Patient CMET that is richt enough in detail to include the GP/PCP care provision
    2. When not using CMETs, include a similar modelling construct as part of the CDA R3 header.


Rationale

Discussion

  • Grahame: Has been mapped as Primary Information Recipient, but this is not right. Can be done using functionCode on participation on service event, but only when the service event is the right kind of service event. (See also CCD 3.17)

Recommended Action Items

  • Perform recommended action

Resolution

March 23, 2010: Agree with the need to represent patient's PCP in header. Details of representation to be worked out. Opposed: 0; Abstain: 0: In favor: 6.