This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "CTS2N - 7-Feb-12"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Announcements == | == Announcements == | ||
| − | * | + | * A wiki has been established for managing artifacts. [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Common_Terminology_Services_-_Release_2_%28Normative%29] |
| − | * Craig is leading effort for OMG | + | * Craig Stancl is leading effort for OMG Finalization Task Force, and CTS 2 implementation Guide for IHTSDO. |
| − | |||
== Approach == | == Approach == | ||
* RH - Should we start with PIM and map to SFM? Start with SFM and map to PIM? Does it matter? | * RH - Should we start with PIM and map to SFM? Start with SFM and map to PIM? Does it matter? | ||
| − | * AE - | + | * AE - Suggest we start with SFM, and map to PIM. |
| − | * SN - | + | * SN - Should also bring comments to the FTF. |
| − | * AE - comments to FTF were | + | * AE - comments to FTF were due Feb 1. New comments will be read by the FTF, but may not be implemented. |
| − | * AE - | + | * AE - Ana has taken the PHAST impl of CTS 2 and compared to SFM. Focusing on Read functionality. Will have something able to present and compare in the coming weeks. |
| − | * AE - | + | * AE - Ana has began an initial enumeration of functionality from the SFM. |
| + | '''Premise''': ''We will develop a functional matrix based off requirements specified in the SFM. We will then map functionality represented in the OMG PIM, the PHAST implementation and other to form a functional matrix. This matrix will serve as a working document to develop an updated SFM based on actual implementations. | ||
| + | '' | ||
=== Rational === | === Rational === | ||
Revision as of 17:07, 7 February 2012
Contents
Attendees
- Ana Estelrich (AE)
- Jim Case (JC)
- Ken Rubin (KR)
- Monica Harry (MH)
- Senthil Nachimuthu (SN)
- Wendy Huang (WH)
- Jan
- Brian Schweiller
Announcements
- A wiki has been established for managing artifacts. [1]
- Craig Stancl is leading effort for OMG Finalization Task Force, and CTS 2 implementation Guide for IHTSDO.
Approach
- RH - Should we start with PIM and map to SFM? Start with SFM and map to PIM? Does it matter?
- AE - Suggest we start with SFM, and map to PIM.
- SN - Should also bring comments to the FTF.
- AE - comments to FTF were due Feb 1. New comments will be read by the FTF, but may not be implemented.
- AE - Ana has taken the PHAST impl of CTS 2 and compared to SFM. Focusing on Read functionality. Will have something able to present and compare in the coming weeks.
- AE - Ana has began an initial enumeration of functionality from the SFM.
Premise: We will develop a functional matrix based off requirements specified in the SFM. We will then map functionality represented in the OMG PIM, the PHAST implementation and other to form a functional matrix. This matrix will serve as a working document to develop an updated SFM based on actual implementations.
Rational
- RH - Should we include rational in the CTS 2 SFM outlining decision s made in the OMG PIM?
- AE - This would be useful
Publishing Infrastructure
- Wiki form
- RH _ russ to do some authoring
Artifacts
- RH - How can
- KR - JQ holds the OMG membership for HL7. HL7 and OMG have free access to artifacts. CTS 2 can decide who has access to OMG artifacts for the CTS 2 project. This will not be a barrier.
CTS 2 Normative Development Artifacts
- OMG PIM
- PHAST
Action Items
- Russ to post wiki
- Take an FTF vote to make documents public, and make availability to CTS 2 Normative wiki.
- Russ to ping Frank / Berndt
Issues for Discussion
- At a minimum, should HL7 Conformance Profile be part of the Normative CTS 2??
