Difference between revisions of "CSCR-069 Rename various ActClassContainer codes"
(→Issue) |
(→Issue) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
The use and meaning of “entry” and “organizer” is not consistent across CDA, Clinical Statement, and the ActClassContainer hierarchy. The intent of this proposal is to realign the various usages. No changes are needed to definitions or to the ActClass hierarchy itself. | The use and meaning of “entry” and “organizer” is not consistent across CDA, Clinical Statement, and the ActClassContainer hierarchy. The intent of this proposal is to realign the various usages. No changes are needed to definitions or to the ActClass hierarchy itself. | ||
| + | |||
| + | CDA uses the notion of “entry” to describe any clinical statement within a document section, and uses “organizer” to name one of the clones in the clinical statement choice box whose ActClass values are limited to either “BATTERY” or “CLUSTER”. CDA never talks about “containers”. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Image:Example.jpg]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Clinical Statement uses “organizer” to name one of the clones in the clinical statement choice box whose ActClass values are anything in the ActClassContainer hierarchy. Clinical Statement doesn’t talk about “entries” or “containers”. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The current ActClassContainer hierarchy looks like this: | ||
| + | |||
| + | o (ActClassContainer) | ||
| + | o COMPOSITION | ||
| + | o DOC | ||
| + | o ENTRY | ||
| + | o BATTERY | ||
| + | o CLUSTER | ||
| + | o EXTRACT | ||
| + | o EHR | ||
| + | o FOLDER | ||
| + | o ORGANIZER | ||
| + | o CATEGORY | ||
| + | o DOCBODY | ||
| + | o DOCSECT | ||
| + | o TOPIC | ||
== Recommendation == | == Recommendation == | ||
Revision as of 22:53, 30 September 2006
(This is a template. Do not edit! Copy and paste source into to a new page)
(An announcement of this Change Request must be submitted to the Clinical Statement list to be formally submitted.)
Editing of Change Requests is restricted to the submitter and the co-chairs of the Clinical Statement Project. Other changes will be undone. Please add comments to the "discussion" page associated with this Change Request.
Back to Clinical Statement Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: <<Name>> | Revision date: <<Revision Date>> |
| Submitted date: <<Submit Date>> | Change request ID: <<Change Request ID>> |
Issue
The use and meaning of “entry” and “organizer” is not consistent across CDA, Clinical Statement, and the ActClassContainer hierarchy. The intent of this proposal is to realign the various usages. No changes are needed to definitions or to the ActClass hierarchy itself.
CDA uses the notion of “entry” to describe any clinical statement within a document section, and uses “organizer” to name one of the clones in the clinical statement choice box whose ActClass values are limited to either “BATTERY” or “CLUSTER”. CDA never talks about “containers”.
Clinical Statement uses “organizer” to name one of the clones in the clinical statement choice box whose ActClass values are anything in the ActClassContainer hierarchy. Clinical Statement doesn’t talk about “entries” or “containers”.
The current ActClassContainer hierarchy looks like this:
o (ActClassContainer)
o COMPOSITION
o DOC
o ENTRY
o BATTERY
o CLUSTER
o EXTRACT
o EHR
o FOLDER
o ORGANIZER
o CATEGORY
o DOCBODY
o DOCSECT
o TOPIC
