This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "20180710 US Realm SC Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
| − | + | *Agenda review | |
**Accepted | **Accepted | ||
**Brett notes we’ll be doing a US core block vote in the upcoming weeks | **Brett notes we’ll be doing a US core block vote in the upcoming weeks | ||
Latest revision as of 21:13, 16 July 2018
back to US_Realm_Steering_Committee
back to US_Realm_Steering_Committee_Conference_Calls
| US Realm Steering Committee Call Agenda/Minutes |
Date: 2018-07-10 Time: 1 PM Eastern | ||
| Co-Chairs | Ed/Brett | Note taker(s) | Anne |
| Attendee / Name | |||||
| Calvin Beebe | Keith Boone | Hans Buitendijk | |||
| x | Lorraine Constable | Johnathan Coleman | Ed Hammond | ||
| Tony Julian | Paul Knapp | x | Austin Kreisler | ||
| x | Brett Marquard | Ken McCaslin | Nancy Orvis | ||
| Brian Pech | x | Wayne Kubick | x | Christol Green | |
| x | Sandra Stuart | . | Pat Van Dyke | x | Craig Parker |
| x | Danielle Friend | x | Eric Haas | . | Jenni Syed |
| x | Steve Posnak | . | David Susanto | . | John Roberts |
| Visitor/ Name | |||||
| x | Dragon | ||||
| Quorum: Chair + 7 | |||||
Agenda
Administrivia
- Agenda review
- Review notes from 20180703_US_Realm_SC_Call
- Review Items
Discussion:
- Review of any outstanding issues
Minutes
- Agenda review
- Accepted
- Brett notes we’ll be doing a US core block vote in the upcoming weeks
- Review notes from 20180703_US_Realm_SC_Call
- Accepted via general consent
- Review Items
- Patient Reported Outcomes PSS
- Dragon presents project. Question on whether OO is an interested party or a cosponsor. Lorraine advises to take STU out of the first line of project objectives. Austin notes that the project will have to go to ARB because of external content. Clarification that OO is an interested party, not a cosponsor.
- MOTION to approve with edits: Lorraine/Wayne
- VOTE: All in favor
- Dragon presents project. Question on whether OO is an interested party or a cosponsor. Lorraine advises to take STU out of the first line of project objectives. Austin notes that the project will have to go to ARB because of external content. Clarification that OO is an interested party, not a cosponsor.
- Patient Reported Outcomes PSS
Discussion:
- Should we adopt TSC attendance policy?
- ACTION: Anne to paste policy into agenda for next time
Meeting Outcomes
| Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2018 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved
