This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "2016 09 02 Minutes - CDA R2.1 Project"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Calvinbeebe (talk | contribs) |
Calvinbeebe (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
## Are there any FHIR composition features to consider? | ## Are there any FHIR composition features to consider? | ||
## For the generic Participant the roleClassCode is too broad for the modeling. | ## For the generic Participant the roleClassCode is too broad for the modeling. | ||
+ | ## Could we support effectiveTime on section when expressed as the time range reported from a clinical system? | ||
# Follow-up with PA on patient name - specifically birth name modeling | # Follow-up with PA on patient name - specifically birth name modeling | ||
# Discussion on the use of stylecodes re: Consolidated guidance on the addition of stylecodes, should we speak to this? | # Discussion on the use of stylecodes re: Consolidated guidance on the addition of stylecodes, should we speak to this? | ||
# Value set binding - can we update syntax? | # Value set binding - can we update syntax? |
Latest revision as of 15:54, 2 September 2016
Attendance
Attendance
- Calvin Beebe
fillout
Minutes / Notes
Items for Baltimore, MD
- Know errors in CDA, how to best manage in CDA R2.1 (balance between correctness and backward compatibility with CDA R2.0)
- relatedDocument .typeCode = XFRM - arrow / inversion indicator (errata)
- Custodian scoping by patient is not possible (organization) should be break wire compatibility
- languageCode usage of CS type (errata)
- Identified issue with listType - required in narrative (wording issue)
- PRE support or stick to styleCode and nonbreaking white space
- Are there any FHIR composition features to consider?
- For the generic Participant the roleClassCode is too broad for the modeling.
- Could we support effectiveTime on section when expressed as the time range reported from a clinical system?
- Follow-up with PA on patient name - specifically birth name modeling
- Discussion on the use of stylecodes re: Consolidated guidance on the addition of stylecodes, should we speak to this?
- Value set binding - can we update syntax?