This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "20080616 Arb JumpStartMinutes"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 34: Line 34:
 
* Homework: AMS - conceptual model of our conformance concepts
 
* Homework: AMS - conceptual model of our conformance concepts
 
* Homework: JC - insuring that the models support verifiability; needs to be in business model; we need to be able to harmonize this with the MIF's expression of dynamic models
 
* Homework: JC - insuring that the models support verifiability; needs to be in business model; we need to be able to harmonize this with the MIF's expression of dynamic models
*
+
* Straw Poll for renaming "Trading Partner Agreement" - "Working Interoperability," "Information Sharing Agreement," "***Interoperability Service Contract Specification***"

Revision as of 20:22, 16 June 2008

Attendees

  • ArB
    • Jane Curry
    • Tony Julian
    • Nancy Orvis
    • AbdulMalik Shakir
    • John Quinn
    • Charlie Mead
    • John Koisch
  • Observers
    • Rich Rogers
    • Galen Mulrooney
    • Ed Larsen
    • Scott Robertson
    • GB

Agenda

  • 8-9 - organization, procedures, etc.
  • 9-11 – Top Down Framework - Trading Partner Agreements, review and development of ‘bull’s eye’ view of services in an HL7 context, including consequences on the outer rings of the Bulls Eye (tbBAM, especially)
  • 11-12 – open discussion with Observers
  • 12-1 – lunch
  • 1-2 – Discussion of Conformance and Compliance
  • 2-4 -- review of SOA TC Dynamic Model proposal and current DM work
  • 4-5 – open discussion with Observers

Minutes

  • AMS went over the DMP. Motion to adopt the DMP (modifying the verbage "by-laws" to "GOM") (TJ), Seconded (JC). Unanimous approval
  • Reviewed agenda
  • Reviewed Scope and Vision
  • Reviewed Top Down Framework. AMS was concerned about the notion of TPA's - there is more value from HL7 than simply in interoperability. JC - but it is HL7's primary mission to cover interoperability. JC suggested TPA be replaced with "Information Sharing Contract". JK suggested "Interoperability Contract Specification". The "top-down framework" needs a better done slide deck.
  • <Break>
  • Discussion with Observers. Explanation between services and RM-ODP. Discussion of tbBAM. Discussion of Scope and Vision. JQ discussed the messaging of SOA out to the greater healthcare community. US Realm - payer industry (customers of X12) has made a move to clinical information. Care Management, expectation that HHS will issue final rules on attachments are motivating this. This will be a paradigm shift for Payer / NCPDP. Ed Larsen - HITSP has a portfolio of use cases. The HL7 EA can provide the organizing principle. AMS - would multiple SDOs use the same reference models?
  • Homework: AMS - conceptual model of our conformance concepts
  • Homework: JC - insuring that the models support verifiability; needs to be in business model; we need to be able to harmonize this with the MIF's expression of dynamic models
  • Straw Poll for renaming "Trading Partner Agreement" - "Working Interoperability," "Information Sharing Agreement," "***Interoperability Service Contract Specification***"