HL7 v3 Requirements

These are high-level HL7 requirements identified by HL7 for the v3 methodology, based on past experience, industry best practice or brought forward by the HL7 membership.

Requirement	HL7 standards must be usable in diverse healthcare environments communities throughout the world in circumstances where global consensus down to the detailed 'implementable' level is not (yet) feasible.
Rationale	HL7 is international in scope with affiliates from over 30 countries from 6 continents There are variations in healthcare across countries, cultures, medical discipline (e.g. internal medicine vs. psychiatry), type of patient (e.g. human vs. veterinary or pediatric vs. geriatric)
Methodology	Business Names CMET Substitution Constraint Derivation Context Binding Realm Localization

Requirement	HL7 v3 standards must provide both functional and semantic and interoperability. I.e. HL7 v3 specifications must standardize both the data structures and mechanics of information exchange as well as the understanding of what that data means, how and when it is to be exchanged and how it is to be used.
Rationale	In order for shared information to be safely usable, shared understanding of the meaning of the data is essential Semantic interoperability was often "weak" in HL7 v2, leading to incompatible implementation Knowledge of data structures alone isn't sufficient for safe interoperability. Without agreement on how and when data is to be exchanged and what the responsibilities of the sender and recipient are, clinical and business processes cannot be safely executed.
Methodology	Shared Reference Model Static Models Dynamic Model

Requirement	HL7 v3 standards should, as much as possible, be independent of any particular implementation technology and should be capable of making use of particular implementation technologies in a standardized way.
Rationale	With HL7 v2, the organization experienced the challenges associated with a specification that was too tightly bound to a particular implementation technology. One of the objectives for HL7 v3 was to be technology independent.
Methodology	Implementation Technology Specification

Requirement	HL7 v3 specifications should be authored and maintained in a manner that ensures and automates, as much as possible, that published artifacts are consistent with the HL7 methodology
Rationale	If we don't follow the methodology, then we are likely to fail to achieve some or all of the requirements that the methodology is intended to support The methodology is complex and lack of automated support would make it too time-consuming to follow and too vulnerable to errors With a volunteer resource base, it's essential to make the standards development process as automated as possible
Methodology	Repository-based artifacts Tool-based maintenance/Publication

Requirement	HL7 v3 specifications and artifacts must capture basic metadata such as names, identifiers, attribution, legal constraints, etc.
Rationale	HL7 specifications are effectively "documents" that need to be searched and interpreted like any other. That means knowing things like the title for the artifact, the identifier for the artifact, who is responsible for it, whether it's been superseded, etc.
Methodology	Metadata