April 29, 2014 CBCC Conference Call
Contents
Community-Based Collaborative Care Working Group Meeting
Meeting Information
Attendees
| Member Name | Present | Member Name | Present | Member Name | Present |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johnathan Coleman CBCC Interim Co-Chair | Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-Chair | x | Jim Kretz CBCC Interim Co-Chair | x | |
| Max Walker CBCC Co-Chair | . | . | . | . | . |
| Wende Baker | Bill Braithwaite, MD | . | Kathleen Connor | x | |
| Daniel Crough | . | Steve Eichner | x | Mohammed Jafari | . |
| Tracy Leeper | Lisa Nelson | Mike Lardiere | x | ||
| Diana Proud-Madruga | Harry Rhodes | Ken Salyards | . | ||
| Lori Simon | . | Ioana Singureanu | Tony Weida | . | |
| Rick Grow | x | Maryann Juurlink | . | Steve Daviss | . |
| Kate Wetherby | x | Neelima Chennamaraja | x | Dina Passman | . |
| Serafina Versaggi | x | Marlowe Greenberg | Chris Clark, WV | . | |
| Ken Ortbals | . | . | . | . |
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll Call, Approve April 22, 2014 CBCC Conference Call
- (25 min) HL7 Data Provenance CDA Project Scope Statement – request for approval Suzanne and Kathleen
- (10 min) Security Labeling Service for FHIR presentation for SOA/FHIR Discovery Day
- (20 min) HL7 Implementation Guide for CDA Release 2: Privacy Consent Directives, Release 1 ballot outcome Suzanne and Kathleen
- (05min) Other business, action items, and adjournment
Meeting Minutes DRAFT
RE: HL7 Data Provenance CDA Project Scope Statement: Motion (Kathleen/Ioana): To accept the PSS for HL7 Data Provenance CDA and move forward Objections: none, Abstentions: 1 (Serafina), Accept: 10
- HL7 US Realm Task Force review
RE: Security Labeling Service for FHIR presentation for SOA/FHIR Discovery Day: Full day of meetings on Tuesday May 6th. RE: Consent Directive CDA ballot outcomes
- HL7 Germany negative comments referenced by four HL7 Germany voters
- Negative vote submitted by Kathy Walsh, Project Analyst, Laboratory Corporation of America
Comment: In the Glossary: I think the first definition is confusing. It sounds like client and patient are the same and if that is the case instead of "1. Client: A client is a person who may receive or has received healthcare services in the past. Patient is a role played by a client in the context of a health care encounter." I would say "1. Patient: A patient is a person who may receive or has received healthcare services in the past." Patient not client is used in the above example. Also I think that other terms used in the above example aught to be defined in the glossary like Originator, Witness, Originator, Intended recipient, and Signed by. Meeting Adjourned at PST
