This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
20131211 PLA call
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
return to HL7 Product Line Architecture Meeting Minutes and Agendas
Return to HL7 Product Line Architecture Program
| HL7 PLA Call Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# |
Date: 2013-12-11 Time: 2 pm Eastern Time | ||
| Facilitator | Austin Kreisler | Note taker(s) | Lynn |
| Attendee | Name
| ||
| x | Calvin Beebe | ||
| Woody Beeler | |||
| x | Lorraine Constable | ||
| Jane Curry | |||
| Bo Dagnall | |||
| Jean Duteau, | |||
| Tony Julian | |||
| Paul Knapp | |||
| x | Austin Kreisler, | ||
| x | Lynn Laakso | ||
| Don Lloyd | |||
| x | Ken McCaslin | ||
| Ron Parker | |||
| Brian Pech | |||
| x | John Quinn | ||
| no quorum definition | |||
Agenda
Agenda review
- Notes of 20131113 PLA call review
- Discussion topic on ballot review for conceptual model items
- BAM-lite feedback and review
- Governance on V2.x (v2.9 substantive changes)
- develop form to request establishing a Product Family
Minutes
- Notes of 20131113 PLA call review
- Discussion topic on ballot review for conceptual model items - how are we positioning some of these cross-product family artifacts, as requested by Don Lloyd
- BAM-lite feedback and review - chapters submitted so far should provide enough information to review establishment of Product Family
- Governance on V2.x (v2.9 substantive changes)
- Can we use this as a test of the process?
- develop form to request establishing a Product Family
- US Realm products really form a product line; is US Realm Task Force more along a Product Line management group? Realm could be a property of a product notes John. Do product lines have governance, management and methodology? If a line has methodology you’ve defeated the purpose of the product family. Elements of the relationship of product line groups to management and methodology with US Realm example discussed.
- location of bam documents: http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/hlbam2b/scmsvn/?action=browse&path=%2Ftrunk%2Fdocuments%2F - BAM Section 3 vision reviewed with definition of product family and product line reviewed.
- Ken suggests trying to map our existing products into families and lines, and the issue of granularity discussed. Austin feels we should let it evolve as folks bring things forward. Usefulness of exercise on a notional division of products into product families and lines discussed to provide examples reviewed. Lorraine asks Ken to identify priorities for the ArB meeting time among which this might be considered. Tomorrow's leadership transition call 2-4 EST will also consider this. May also be able to identify which pieces are orphaned, and the political elements to be surfaced. Austin cautions against trying to organize the S&I Framework product line outside of those standards within HL7 they have chosen.
- Would this group take that on? Austin suggests the new TSC Chair take that task. We'll discuss further tomorrow.
- Governance on V2.x (v2.9 substantive changes)
Adjourned 2:50 PM
Meeting Outcomes
| Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2013 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved
