October 15, 2013 Security WG Conference Call
Security Working Group Meeting
Attendees
- Johnathan Coleman
- Y -Kathleen Connor
- Y - Mike Davis Security Co-chair
- Y - Duane DeCouteau
- Y -Brian Handspicker
- Reed Gelzer
- Y -Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-chair
- Y -Muhammed Jafari
- Don Jorgenson
- John Moehrke Security Co-chair
- Y -Diana Proud-Madruga
- Ioana Singureanu
- David Staggs
- Richard Thoreson CBCC Co-chair
- Tony Weida
- Trish Williams
- Harry Rhodes
==SPECIAL BALLOT VOTE MEETING TO
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
- (15 min) Ballot Reconciliation HCS - review of latest
- (15 min) Agenda Item
- (10 min) Other Business
Meeting Minutes
Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
Ballot Reconciliation DS4P review
from e-mail string:
Ioana has made a small change to the disposition comment#4 (row7) - an "affirmative comment" - and updates the spreadsheet on the Security WG GForge release page: http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/security/frs/?action=FrsReleaseBrowse&frs_package_id=229
There are a few items that require review/vote from Security WG:
- Items Number 15, 16 (rows 18,19) - updated from "Clarification required" to "Persuasive" - these items require a discussion and vote. If I did not capture the intent of the submitter, please feel free to augment the disposition comment.
- Items Numbers 7, 23 (rows 10, 26) - updated from "Not persuasive" to "Persuasive with mod" - these need a discussion and a vote. If I did not capture the intent of the submitter, please feel free to augment the disposition comment.
- Item Number 103 (row 107) - was discussed by Johnathan and I recorded the agreed comment; it requires a vote. No discussion should be needed to close this item.
Ballot Reconciliation HCS Ballot Reconciliation Spreadsheet
Lines 13-31
- comment 10,11 - more verbiage added
- Mike expressed concern on 'Note to Readers' pointing to non-Normative information
- comment 12, 13, 14
- comment 17 / John Snyder (write up/read down - wording change)
- comment 19
- comment 20 break glass; remark is out of scope. HCS is not about defining policy or defining mechanisms to implement policy but provides vocabulary in supporting policy. See Security Work Group Emergency Access paper by Mike Davis and John Moehrke.
- comment 21 accepted, comment withdrawn
- line 31 - Mike is not opposed to new work regarding new rules, bring these in and make them normative--as this is a larger change
Motion to accept ballot resolutions comments 13-31 (Alan Hobbs, Lisa, John M) No Discussion Vote: objections: none; abstentions: none; approval: 7 - motion passes
Kathleen will send reminder to commenters to withdraw negative votes on HCS.
Meeting adjourned at 3:04PM PST
--Suzannegw 22:04, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
