October 15, 2013 Security WG Conference Call

Security Working Group Meeting

• Meeting Information

Back to Security Main Page

Attendees

• Johnathan Coleman
• Y -Kathleen Connor
• Y - Mike Davis Security Co-chair
• Y - Duane DeCouteau
• Y -Brian Handspicker
• Reed Gelzer
• Y -Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-chair
• Y -Muhammed Jafari
• Don Jorgenson
• John Moehrke Security Co-chair
• Y -Diana Proud-Madruga
• Ioana Singureanu
• [1]
• Richard Thoreson CBCC Co-chair
• Tony Weida
• Trish Williams
• Harry Rhodes

==SPECIAL BALLOT VOTE MEETING TO

Back to Security Main Page

Agenda

1. (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
2. (15 min) Ballot Reconciliation HCS - review of latest
3. (15 min) Agenda Item

1. (10 min) Other Business

Meeting Minutes

Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda

Ballot Reconciliation DS4P review

Ioana has made a small change to the disposition comment#4 (row7) - an "affirmative comment" - and updates the spreadsheet on the Security WG GForge release page: http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/security/frs/?action=FrsReleaseBrowse&frs_package_id=229

There are a few items that require review/vote from Security WG:

• Items Number 15, 16 (rows 18,19) - updated from "Clarification required" to "Persuasive" - these items require a discussion and vote. If I did not capture the intent of the submitter, please feel free to augment the disposition comment.
• Items Numbers 7, 23 (rows 10, 26) - updated from "Not persuasive" to "Persuasive with mod" - these need a discussion and a vote. If I did not capture the intent of the submitter, please feel free to augment the disposition comment.
• Item Number 103 (row 107) - was discussed by Johnathan and I recorded the agreed comment; it requires a vote. No discussion should be needed to close this item.

Ballot Reconciliation HCS

• comment 10,11 - more verbiage added
  • Mike expressed concern on 'Note to Readers' pointing to non-Normative information
• comment 12, 13, 14
• comment 17 / John Snyder (write up/read down - wording change)
• comment 19
• comment 20 break glass; remark is out of scope. HCS is not about defining policy or defining mechanisms to implement policy but provides vocabulary in supporting policy