This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
OO CR086 - Reflex Testing
Return to OO Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: | Revision date: <<Revision Date>> |
| Submitted date: | Change request ID: |
| Standard/IG: Implementation Guide | Artifact ID, Name: |
Contents
Issue
Recommendation
Rationale
Discussion
Recommended Action Items
Resolution
Return to OO Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: Pilots | Revision date: <<Revision Date>> |
| Submitted date: Mar-2012 | Change request ID: OO CR086 |
| Standard/IG: Implementation Guide | Artifact ID, Name: <<Artifact ID, Name>> |
Issue
Do we permit reflex testing as both the addition of a new OBR/OBX as well as adding only one or more new OBXs to an existing OBR? Both are currently done by multiple laboratories (including both by the same lab)
Recommendation
Rationale
Discussion
- 21-Jun-2012 - Concerned that having multiple options creates confusion and conflicts with micro parent/child. When done on a culture, then should using parent/child.
- Suggestion to clarify that reflex tests are communicated using parent/child. We know that is not testable at this point, so it cannot be more than guidance. Will arrive at a conclusion on 26 Jun.
- 12-Jul-2012 - We could not complete this item in time. Motion to consider this for future use. Bob Yencha, Ken McCaslin
Recommended Action Items
24-Jul-2012 - Get feedback from the Laboratory Results Workgroup (Bob Dieterle) on use case whether we need to support both new OBR/OBX, or new OBX for existing OBR, or both and then determine how to support.
