This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
2018-10-10 FMG concall
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| HL7 TSC FMG Meeting Minutes Location: |
Date: 2018-10-10 Time: 4:00 PM U.S. Eastern | |
| Chair: | Note taker(s): Anne W. | |
| Quorum = chair + 4 | yes/no | |||||
| Co chairs | David Hay | Lloyd McKenzie | ||||
| ex-officio | . | Wayne Kubick, CTO | ||||
| Members | Members | Members | Observers/Guests | ||||
| Hans Buitendijk | Brian Postlethwaite | Paul Knapp | Anne W., scribe | ||||
| Josh Mandel | John Moehrke | Brian Pech | |||||
| Grahame Grieve | . | ||||||
Agenda
- Roll Call
- Agenda Check
- Minutes from 2018-09-26 FMG concall
- Minutes from 2018-09-30_FMG_WGM
- Minutes from 2018-10-04_FMG_WGM
- Action items
- Grahame to put together something to describe a desired level of BR&R community engagement in order to own Substance
- Lloyd to draft a process for approving technically breaking changes that are believed not to impact any implementations and submit for review by FMG, MnM and SGB
- Anne to contact BR&R cochairs/modeling facilitator to ask them to update the resource relationships section of AdverseEvent
- Hans to reach out to OO on BiologicallyDerivedProduct at WGM
- Brian Post to add RIM scope and boundaries section to ChargeItemDefinition
- Hans to check with OO, CDS, and CQI about DeviceUseStatement at WGM
- Hans to check with Lorraine about EntryDefinition at WGM
- Brian Post to update Invoice
- Hans to follow up with OO on ObservationDefinition2 at WGM
- John to draft language regarding virtual Connectathons
- Grahame to identify and fix bugs and US Core before FMG/TSC approval
- Suggest to HL7 to include a Zulip link for WGM attendee questions about where they should go
- Review Items
- Ballot Review/FMG-assigned ballot items
- Discussion Topics
- What to do with the QA results from prior to first ballot
- Criteria for what you need to have to claim that an IG is international in scope
- Criteria for inclusion of extensions in core vs. IGs
- What content is/isn't attracting ballot feedback
- PSS form:
- Has it been updated to set an expectation to capture plans (including funding, community) for long-term maintenance of whatever project artifacts have been created?
- Has it been updated to include plans for community formation, engagement and implementation?
- Setting expectations around community establishment and real-world testing before content is allowed to go to ballot
- Reports
- Connectathon management (David/Brian)
- SGB –
- MnM –
- FMG Liaisons –
- Process management
- Ballot Planning
- Ballot content review and QA process FHIR QA Guidelines
- AOB (Any Other Business)
Minutes
Next Steps
| Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date) | |||
| Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
Back to FHIR_Management_Group
© 2018 Health Level Seven® International
