This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Condition/Diagnosis/Problem (QDM)
Revision as of 12:35, 29 March 2018 by FEisenberg (talk | contribs)
Back to Harmonization of Health Quality Information Models Page
| QDM Attribute | QI Core Metadata Element | Comment |
| Diagnosis | Condition (the .clinicalstatus metadata allows conformance to the specific QDM datatype context) | QDM defaults the status to active and prevalence period provides the evidence of activity. |
| Prevalence Period | Condition.onset[x] | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR for start of Prevalence Period |
| Condition.abatement[x] | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR for end of Prevalence Period | |
| Anatomical Location Site | Condition.bodySite | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR |
| Severity | Condition.severity | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR |
| Code | Condition.code | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR |
| Author dateTime | Condition.assertedDate | FHIR provenance addressed author time, Condition.assertedDate may be closer to the onset of the QDM Prevalence Period. Consider - the software may default assertedDate to the date entered requiring manual editing to enter a different date. Further, does it reflect the date the assertion is made or the date the patient asserted that the condition began? Seeking guidance - due to potential ambiguity, should QDM map to FHIR provenance? |
| id | Condition.id | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR |
| Source | Condition.asserter | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR |
